2 prospects · 2017 draft
Decisive factor: 52-pick gap on Draftanomics projection. Reinforced by a bust risk 18 points lower and a stronger historical comp arc.
The four numbers a GM checks first.
Each axis is the prospect's percentile among prospects at his position (0–100). Bigger shape = stronger across the board.
Top five historical comps per prospect. Shared comps highlighted.
Top three concerns and top two upside signals from the model.
Projected share of his team's snaps across the first four NFL seasons. Solid = seasons already played, dashed = the forecast.
The model's plain-English read.
Draftanomics projects Joe Williams (age 23.6 at draft) as a Day 3 dart throw at #242 (range #213-#271, very wide band — too little on him yet to project tightly). Bust probability sits at 66% — scary. The comp set is strong: 3 of 5 closest comps with known NFL outcomes became starters or better. Closest comps: Jeremy Langford (Starter), David Cobb (Bust), David Johnson (Franchise). Ceiling is David Johnson (Franchise); floor is Cameron Artis-Payne (Starter). Drafted #121 by SFO in 2017 but recorded ZERO regular-season NFL snaps. Year-1 absence is one of the strongest single-signal bust predictors we have. The call is a genuine fade: the room's consensus prices him around #184 and the model won't take him before #242 — a 58-spot markdown. The discount is earned — missed entire rookie season leads the case against.
Draftanomics projects Devante Mays (age 22.9 at draft) as a Day 3 dart throw at #190 (range #157-#223, very wide band — too little on him yet to project tightly). Bust probability sits at 48% — elevated. The comp set is strong: 3 of 5 closest comps with known NFL outcomes became starters or better. Closest comps: Duke Johnson (Franchise), David Cobb (Bust), Josh Robinson (Bust). Ceiling is Tevin Coleman (Franchise); floor is David Johnson (Franchise). No Combine drills or Pro Day numbers on file while most of the class has tested — the athletic part of the grade is unmeasured. The call is a conviction buy: the model has him 304 spots ahead of the room (board #190 vs consensus #494) — but size the bet for the 48% bust probability; this is a price edge, not a safety edge.