Draftanomics
  • 2027 board
  • Consensus board
  • 2028 way-too-early
  • Draft news
  • Simulator
  • The house mock
  • Draft order
  • Trade calculator
  • The Scouting Slate
  • Sleepers & reaches
  • Movers & fallers
  • Player comps
  • Dynasty rookie board
  • Track record
  • Past drafts, re-graded
  • Analyst leaderboard
My rankingsAccount
Get the weekly →
Draftanomics

Honest NFL Draft analytics. The model's receipts against actual NFL teams live on the track record.

Boards
  • 2027 board
  • Consensus board
  • Sleepers
Tools
  • Mock draft simulator
  • Plays Like
  • Dynasty rookie board
Track Record
  • Year-by-year results
  • Accountability Index
  • Our board, on the record
  • Past drafts, re-graded
  • Methodology
  • Developers · free API
  • About
Account
  • My board
  • Weekly email
Data + sources
RAS by Kent Lee Platte·Consensus Big Board (Arif Hasan)·nflverse·PFR·CFBD·All sources & credits·Methodology
Career-value model, live
Privacy·Terms·Press ⌘K to search·Draftanomics2026
  1. Draftanomics/
  2. Prospects/
  3. 2017 board/
  4. Compare

Side-by-side comparison

Backtest

2 prospects · 2017 draft

Each spoke: percentile within the prospect's own position (WR)
IM
Isaiah McKenzie
WR · Georgia
22.1 yo · 5'7" · 173 lb
RD
Robert Davis
WR · Georgia St.
22.1 yo · 6'3" · 219 lb
Tiebreaker
Medium confidence
Take Isaiah McKenzie over Robert Davis.

Decisive factor: a bust risk 57 points lower.

Headline metrics

The four numbers a GM checks first.

Isaiah McKenzie
Predicted pick
#221
range #171–#271
Bust probability
0%
0%0/5 comps
Consensus rank
—
no boards yet
Career arc
Contributor
tier · Day 3
2nd-deal AAV
$4Mmodel
Robert Davis
Predicted pick
#198
range #146–#250
Bust probability
57%
0%0/5 comps
Consensus rank
—
no boards yet
Career arc
Franchise
tier · Day 3
2nd-deal AAV
$4Mmodel

Feature radar

Each axis is the prospect's percentile among prospects at his position (0–100). Bigger shape = stronger across the board.

ProductionAthleticismAgeConsensusPer-play impact (PPA)Breakout ageWorkloadRAS × production
Prospects
  • Isaiah McKenzie· RB / WR / TE
  • Robert Davis· RB / WR / TE
Axis leaders
  • ProductionIsaiah McKenzie41
  • AthleticismRobert Davis100
  • AgeRobert Davis99
  • ConsensusRobert Davis7
  • Per-play impact (PPA)Isaiah McKenzie50
  • Breakout ageIsaiah McKenzie50
  • WorkloadIsaiah McKenzie100
  • RAS × productionIsaiah McKenzie50

Comp overlap

Top five historical comps per prospect. Shared comps highlighted.

Shared comps
  • Stefon DiggsWR · Franchise→ shared byIsaiah McKenzieRobert Davis
  • Tre McBrideWR · Contributor→ shared byIsaiah McKenzieRobert Davis
Isaiah McKenzie
  • Darren Waller
    WR · #204
    Contributor
  • Devin Funchess
    WR · #41
    Franchise
  • Stefon Diggsshared
    WR · #146
    Franchise
  • Tre McBrideshared
    WR · #245
    Contributor
  • Dezmin Lewis
    WR · #234
    Starter
Robert Davis
  • Tre McBrideshared
    WR · #245
    Contributor
  • Geremy Davis
    WR · #186
    Starter
  • Mario Alford
    WR · #238
    Bust
  • Stefon Diggsshared
    WR · #146
    Franchise
  • Phillip Dorsett
    WR · #29
    Franchise

Risk and opportunity flags

Top three concerns and top two upside signals from the model.

Isaiah McKenzie
Risks
  • Below-cohort college production
    Position-cohort z-score on production composite is -1.28 — well below the skill average. Raw box-score output didn't keep pace with peers.
Opportunities
  • Consensus says higher
    1 board have him at mean rank #152; model has him #221 — a 69-spot fade. Analysts converging this much above the model is a tell that the model is undervaluing him.
  • Strong comp group
    3 of 3 closest comps with NFL outcomes became Starters or Franchise players: Devin Funchess, Stefon Diggs, Dezmin Lewis. The historical neighborhood overwhelmingly produced NFL contributors.
Robert Davis
Risks
  • Small-school competition
    School SP+ rating -12.1 (well below FBS median of 0). College production may not translate against NFL-quality DBs/pass-rushers. Schedule rank #99 (1=hardest).
Opportunities
  • Strong comp group
    3 of 4 closest comps with NFL outcomes became Starters or Franchise players: Geremy Davis, Stefon Diggs, Phillip Dorsett. The historical neighborhood overwhelmingly produced NFL contributors.

Career trajectory forecast

Projected share of his team's snaps across the first four NFL seasons. Solid = seasons already played, dashed = the forecast.

0%25%50%75%100%Y1Y2Y3Y4Snap share
Isaiah McKenzieRobert Davis· solid = actuals, dashed = forecast

Verdict

The model's plain-English read.

Isaiah McKenzie

Draftanomics projects Isaiah McKenzie (age 22.1 at draft) as a Day 3 dart throw at #221 (range #171-#271, very wide band — too little on him yet to project tightly). Bust probability sits at 0% — low. The comp set is strong: 3 of 3 closest comps with known NFL outcomes became starters or better. Closest comps: Darren Waller (Contributor), Devin Funchess (Franchise), Stefon Diggs (Franchise). Ceiling is Devin Funchess (Franchise); floor is Tre McBride (Contributor). Career trajectory in receiving yards: 67 → 123 → 633. Production rose every season — the kind of upward arc that often continues into the league. Position-cohort z-score on production composite is -1.28 — well below the skill average. Raw box-score output didn't keep pace with peers. The call is a genuine fade: the room's consensus prices him around #152 and the model won't take him before #221 — a 69-spot markdown. The discount is earned — below-cohort college production leads the case against.

Robert Davis

Draftanomics projects Robert Davis (age 22.1 at draft) as a Day 3 dart throw at #198 (range #146-#250, very wide band — too little on him yet to project tightly). Bust probability sits at 57% — elevated. The comp set is strong: 3 of 4 closest comps with known NFL outcomes became starters or better. Closest comps: Tre McBride (Contributor), Geremy Davis (Starter), Mario Alford (Bust). Ceiling is Phillip Dorsett (Franchise); floor is Tre McBride (Contributor). School SP+ rating -12.1 (well below FBS median of 0). College production may not translate against NFL-quality DBs/pass-rushers. Schedule rank #99 (1=hardest). The call is a lean fade: the model sits 20 spots below the room's consensus #178 — don't pay sticker price. The discount is earned — small-school competition leads the case against.