Draftanomics
  • 2027 board
  • Consensus board
  • 2028 way-too-early
  • Draft news
  • Simulator
  • The house mock
  • Draft order
  • Trade calculator
  • The Scouting Slate
  • Sleepers & reaches
  • Movers & fallers
  • Player comps
  • Dynasty rookie board
  • Track record
  • Past drafts, re-graded
  • Analyst leaderboard
My rankingsAccount
Get the weekly →
Draftanomics

Honest NFL Draft analytics. The model's receipts against actual NFL teams live on the track record.

Boards
  • 2027 board
  • Consensus board
  • Sleepers
Tools
  • Mock draft simulator
  • Plays Like
  • Dynasty rookie board
Track Record
  • Year-by-year results
  • Accountability Index
  • Our board, on the record
  • Past drafts, re-graded
  • Methodology
  • Developers · free API
  • About
Account
  • My board
  • Weekly email
Data + sources
RAS by Kent Lee Platte·Consensus Big Board (Arif Hasan)·nflverse·PFR·CFBD·All sources & credits·Methodology
Career-value model, live
Privacy·Terms·Press ⌘K to search·Draftanomics2026
  1. Draftanomics/
  2. Prospects/
  3. 2017 board/
  4. Compare

Side-by-side comparison

Backtest

3 prospects · 2017 draft

Each spoke: percentile within the prospect's own position (LB)
MM
Matt Milano
LB · Boston Col.
22.7 yo · — · —
BB
Blair Brown
LB · Ohio
22.9 yo · — · —
ML
Marquel Lee
LB · Wake Forest
21.5 yo · — · —

Headline metrics

The four numbers a GM checks first.

Matt Milano
Predicted pick
#75
range #33–#117
Bust probability
0%
0%0/4 comps
Consensus rank
—
no boards yet
Career arc
Franchise
tier · Day 2
2nd-deal AAV
$16Mmodel
Blair Brown
Predicted pick
#61
range #19–#103
Bust probability
51%
0%0/4 comps
Consensus rank
#157
on 2 boards
Career arc
Franchise
tier · Day 2
2nd-deal AAV
$6Mmodel
Marquel Lee
Predicted pick
#116
range #65–#167
Bust probability
0%
0%0/5 comps
Consensus rank
—
no boards yet
Career arc
Franchise
tier · Day 3
2nd-deal AAV
$2Mmodel

Feature radar

Each axis is the prospect's percentile among prospects at his position (0–100). Bigger shape = stronger across the board.

ProductionAthleticismAgeConsensusPer-play impact (PPA)Breakout ageWorkloadRAS × production
Prospects
  • Matt Milano· EDGE / DL / LB
  • Blair Brown· EDGE / DL / LB
  • Marquel Lee· EDGE / DL / LB
Axis leaders
  • ProductionMarquel Lee55
  • AthleticismMatt Milano36
  • AgeMarquel Lee94
  • ConsensusMatt Milano8
  • Per-play impact (PPA)Matt Milano50
  • Breakout ageMatt Milano50
  • WorkloadMatt Milano100
  • RAS × productionMatt Milano31

Comp overlap

Top five historical comps per prospect. Shared comps highlighted.

Shared comps
  • Tyeler DavisonDT · Franchise→ shared byMatt MilanoBlair BrownMarquel Lee
  • Benardrick McKinneyILB · Franchise→ shared byMatt MilanoMarquel Lee
  • Brian MihalikEDGE · Bust→ shared byMatt MilanoMarquel Lee
  • David MayoLB · Contributor→ shared byMatt MilanoMarquel Lee
  • Preston SmithEDGE · Franchise→ shared byBlair BrownMarquel Lee
Matt Milano
  • Benardrick McKinneyshared
    ILB · #43
    Franchise
  • Brian Mihalikshared
    EDGE · #237
    Bust
  • David Mayoshared
    LB · #169
    Contributor
  • Max Valles
    OLB · #179
    TBD
  • Tyeler Davisonshared
    DT · #154
    Franchise
Blair Brown
  • Preston Smithshared
    EDGE · #38
    Franchise
  • Christian Ringo
    EDGE · #210
    Starter
  • Kristjan Sokoli
    DT · #214
    TBD
  • Tyeler Davisonshared
    DT · #154
    Franchise
  • Ryan Russell
    EDGE · #163
    Franchise
Marquel Lee
  • Benardrick McKinneyshared
    ILB · #43
    Franchise
  • Preston Smithshared
    EDGE · #38
    Franchise
  • Tyeler Davisonshared
    DT · #154
    Franchise
  • David Mayoshared
    LB · #169
    Contributor
  • Brian Mihalikshared
    EDGE · #237
    Bust

Risk and opportunity flags

Top three concerns and top two upside signals from the model.

Matt Milano
Risks
  • No athletic testing
    No Combine drills or Pro Day numbers on file while most of the class has tested — the athletic part of the grade is unmeasured.
  • Consensus skeptic
    1 board place him at mean rank #229; model has him #75 — a 154-spot gap. When boards fade a player this hard, the model is usually the one missing something.
Opportunities
  • Promising comp group
    2 of 3 closest comps with NFL outcomes hit Starter-or-better: Benardrick McKinney, Tyeler Davison.
Blair Brown
Risks
  • No athletic testing
    No Combine drills or Pro Day numbers on file while most of the class has tested — the athletic part of the grade is unmeasured.
  • Consensus skeptic
    3 boards place him at mean rank #103; model has him #61 — a 42-spot gap. When boards fade a player this hard, the model is usually the one missing something.
Opportunities
  • Strong comp group
    4 of 4 closest comps with NFL outcomes became Starters or Franchise players: Preston Smith, Christian Ringo, Tyeler Davison (+1 more). The historical neighborhood overwhelmingly produced NFL contributors.
Marquel Lee
Risks
  • No athletic testing
    No Combine drills or Pro Day numbers on file while most of the class has tested — the athletic part of the grade is unmeasured.
  • Consensus skeptic
    1 board place him at mean rank #268; model has him #116 — a 152-spot gap. When boards fade a player this hard, the model is usually the one missing something.
Opportunities
  • Strong comp group
    3 of 4 closest comps with NFL outcomes became Starters or Franchise players: Benardrick McKinney, Preston Smith, Tyeler Davison. The historical neighborhood overwhelmingly produced NFL contributors.

Career trajectory forecast

Projected share of his team's snaps across the first four NFL seasons. Solid = seasons already played, dashed = the forecast.

0%25%50%75%100%Y1Y2Y3Y4Snap share
Matt MilanoBlair BrownMarquel Lee· solid = actuals, dashed = forecast

Verdict

The model's plain-English read.

Matt Milano

Draftanomics projects Matt Milano (age 22.7 at draft) as a third-round / early Day 3 pick at #75 (range #33-#117, very wide band — too little on him yet to project tightly). Bust probability sits at 0% — low. The comp set is strong: 2 of 3 closest comps with known NFL outcomes became starters or better. Closest comps: Benardrick McKinney (Franchise), Brian Mihalik (Bust), David Mayo (Contributor). Ceiling is Benardrick McKinney (Franchise); floor is Max Valles. No Combine drills or Pro Day numbers on file while most of the class has tested — the athletic part of the grade is unmeasured. The call is a conviction buy: the model has him 154 spots ahead of the room (board #75 vs consensus #229), and at a 0% bust probability the edge is worth paying for.

Blair Brown

Draftanomics projects Blair Brown (age 22.9 at draft) as a Day 2 pick at #61 (range #19-#103, very wide band — too little on him yet to project tightly). Bust probability sits at 51% — elevated. The comp set is strong: 4 of 4 closest comps with known NFL outcomes became starters or better. Closest comps: Preston Smith (Franchise), Christian Ringo (Starter), Kristjan Sokoli. Ceiling is Preston Smith (Franchise); floor is Kristjan Sokoli. No Combine drills or Pro Day numbers on file while most of the class has tested — the athletic part of the grade is unmeasured. The call is a conviction buy: the model has him 42 spots ahead of the room (board #61 vs consensus #103) — but size the bet for the 51% bust probability; this is a price edge, not a safety edge.

Marquel Lee

Draftanomics projects Marquel Lee (age 21.5 at draft) as a mid-round flyer at #116 (range #65-#167, very wide band — too little on him yet to project tightly). Bust probability sits at 0% — low. The comp set is strong: 3 of 4 closest comps with known NFL outcomes became starters or better. Closest comps: Benardrick McKinney (Franchise), Preston Smith (Franchise), Tyeler Davison (Franchise). Ceiling is Preston Smith (Franchise); floor is David Mayo (Contributor). No Combine drills or Pro Day numbers on file while most of the class has tested — the athletic part of the grade is unmeasured. The call is a conviction buy: the model has him 152 spots ahead of the room (board #116 vs consensus #268), and at a 0% bust probability the edge is worth paying for.