Draftanomics
  • 2027 board
  • Consensus board
  • 2028 way-too-early
  • Draft news
  • Simulator
  • The house mock
  • Draft order
  • Trade calculator
  • The Scouting Slate
  • Sleepers & reaches
  • Movers & fallers
  • Player comps
  • Dynasty rookie board
  • Track record
  • Past drafts, re-graded
  • Analyst leaderboard
My rankingsAccount
Get the weekly →
Draftanomics

Honest NFL Draft analytics. The model's receipts against actual NFL teams live on the track record.

Boards
  • 2027 board
  • Consensus board
  • Sleepers
Tools
  • Mock draft simulator
  • Plays Like
  • Dynasty rookie board
Track Record
  • Year-by-year results
  • Accountability Index
  • Our board, on the record
  • Past drafts, re-graded
  • Methodology
  • Developers · free API
  • About
Account
  • My board
  • Weekly email
Data + sources
RAS by Kent Lee Platte·Consensus Big Board (Arif Hasan)·nflverse·PFR·CFBD·All sources & credits·Methodology
Career-value model, live
Privacy·Terms·Press ⌘K to search·Draftanomics2026
  1. Draftanomics/
  2. Prospects/
  3. 2017 board/
  4. Compare

Side-by-side comparison

Backtest

2 prospects · 2017 draft

Each spoke: percentile within the prospect's own position (CB)
MW
Marquez White
CB · Florida St.
22.5 yo · 6'0" · 194 lb
CS
Cameron Sutton
CB · Tennessee
22.2 yo · 5'11" · 188 lb
Tiebreaker
High confidence
Take Cameron Sutton over Marquez White.

Decisive factor: a bust risk 36 points lower. Reinforced by 49-pick gap on Draftanomics projection, a stronger historical comp arc and $7M/yr more in projected second-deal AAV.

Headline metrics

The four numbers a GM checks first.

Marquez White
Projected range
Rounds 4-6
half went picks 143-225
Bust probability· rough estimate
66%
0%comp-based · 0/3
Consensus rank
—
no boards yet
Career arc
arrives after the combineThe forecast needs his measurables first.
2nd-deal AAV
$2.4M-$3.8Mmodel
Cameron Sutton
Projected range
Rounds 4-6
half went picks 115-207
Bust probability· rough estimate
30%
0%comp-based · 0/4
Consensus rank
#139
on 18 boards
Career arc
Bust
tier · Day 3
2nd-deal AAV
$7.8M-$11.9Mmodel

Feature radar

Each axis is the prospect's percentile among prospects at his position (0–100). Bigger shape = stronger across the board.

ProductionAthleticismAgeConsensusPer-play impact (PPA)Breakout ageWorkloadRAS × production
Prospects
  • Marquez White· CB / S
  • Cameron Sutton· CB / S
Axis leaders
  • ProductionMarquez White0
  • AthleticismMarquez White36
  • AgeMarquez White100
  • ConsensusMarquez White3
  • Per-play impact (PPA)Marquez White50
  • Breakout ageMarquez White50
  • WorkloadMarquez White30
  • RAS × productionMarquez White53

Comp overlap

Top five historical comps per prospect. Shared comps highlighted.

Shared comps
  • Senquez GolsonCB · TBD→ shared byMarquez WhiteCameron Sutton
  • Charles GainesCB · Bust→ shared byMarquez WhiteCameron Sutton
  • Alex CarterCB · Bust→ shared byMarquez WhiteCameron Sutton
Marquez White
  • Jalen Collins
    CB · #42
    Starter
  • Senquez Golsonshared
    CB · #56
    TBD
  • Charles Gainesshared
    CB · #189
    Bust
  • Ifo Ekpre-Olomu
    CB · #241
    TBD
  • Alex Cartershared
    CB · #80
    Bust
Cameron Sutton
  • Senquez Golsonshared
    CB · #56
    TBD
  • Charles Gainesshared
    CB · #189
    Bust
  • Marcus Peters
    CB · #18
    Franchise
  • Alex Cartershared
    CB · #80
    Bust
  • Steven Nelson
    CB · #98
    Starter

Risk and opportunity flags

Top three concerns and top two upside signals from the model.

Marquez White
Risks
  • Missed entire rookie season
    Drafted #216 by DAL in 2017 but recorded ZERO regular-season NFL snaps. Year-1 absence is one of the strongest single-signal bust predictors we have.
  • CB slow 40 (4.59s)
    40-yard dash of 4.59s — historically corners above 4.55s rarely become NFL starters.
  • Comp group bust rate
    2 of 3 closest comps with NFL outcomes washed out: Charles Gaines, Alex Carter. The neighborhood in feature space is dangerous.
Opportunities
No standout upside flags.
Cameron Sutton
Risks
  • Comp group has bust risk
    2 of 4 closest comps with NFL outcomes ended up backups or busts: Charles Gaines, Alex Carter. Mixed signal from history.
  • Below-cohort college production
    Position-cohort z-score on production composite is -1.24 — well below the secondary average. Raw box-score output didn't keep pace with peers.
Opportunities
No standout upside flags.

Career trajectory forecast

Projected share of his team's snaps across the first four NFL seasons. Solid = seasons already played, dashed = the forecast.

0%25%50%75%100%Y1Y2Y3Y4Snap share
Marquez WhiteCameron Sutton· solid = actuals, dashed = forecast

Verdict

The model's plain-English read.

Marquez White

Draftanomics projects Marquez White (age 22.5 at draft) as a Day 3 dart throw at #201 (range #149-#253, very wide band — too little on him yet to project tightly). Bust probability sits at 66% — scary. The comp set is dangerous: 2 of 3 closest comps with known NFL outcomes washed out as backups or busts. Closest comps: Jalen Collins (Starter), Senquez Golson, Charles Gaines (Bust). Ceiling is Jalen Collins (Starter); floor is Ifo Ekpre-Olomu. Drafted #216 by DAL in 2017 but recorded ZERO regular-season NFL snaps. Year-1 absence is one of the strongest single-signal bust predictors we have. The call is a hold: no public board ranks him, so the model's #201 stands alone — and with bust risk at 66%, let the room catch up before paying a premium.

Cameron Sutton

Draftanomics projects Cameron Sutton (age 22.2 at draft) as a mid-round flyer at #152 (range #114-#190, very wide band — too little on him yet to project tightly). Bust probability sits at 30% — manageable. The comp set is mixed: 2 starters-or-better vs 2 backups-or-busts among the 4 comps with known outcomes. Closest comps: Senquez Golson, Charles Gaines (Bust), Marcus Peters (Franchise). Ceiling is Marcus Peters (Franchise); floor is Senquez Golson. 2 of 4 closest comps with NFL outcomes ended up backups or busts: Charles Gaines, Alex Carter. Mixed signal from history. The call is a lean fade: the model sits 13 spots below the room's consensus #139 — don't pay sticker price. The discount is earned — comp group has bust risk leads the case against.