Draftanomics
  • 2027 board
  • Consensus board
  • 2028 way-too-early
  • Draft news
  • Simulator
  • The house mock
  • Draft order
  • Trade calculator
  • The Scouting Slate
  • Sleepers & reaches
  • Movers & fallers
  • Player comps
  • Dynasty rookie board
  • Track record
  • Past drafts, re-graded
  • Analyst leaderboard
My rankingsAccount
Get the weekly →
Draftanomics

Honest NFL Draft analytics. The model's receipts against actual NFL teams live on the track record.

Boards
  • 2027 board
  • Consensus board
  • Sleepers
Tools
  • Mock draft simulator
  • Plays Like
  • Dynasty rookie board
Track Record
  • Year-by-year results
  • Accountability Index
  • Our board, on the record
  • Past drafts, re-graded
  • Methodology
  • Developers · free API
  • About
Account
  • My board
  • Weekly email
Data + sources
RAS by Kent Lee Platte·Consensus Big Board (Arif Hasan)·nflverse·PFR·CFBD·All sources & credits·Methodology
Career-value model, live
Privacy·Terms·Press ⌘K to search·Draftanomics2026
  1. Draftanomics/
  2. Prospects/
  3. 2017 board/
  4. Compare

Side-by-side comparison

Backtest

3 prospects · 2017 draft

Each spoke: percentile within the prospect's own position (C)
JD
JJ Dielman
C · Utah
— · — · —
KA
Kofi Amichia
C · South Florida
— · — · —
KF
Kyle Fuller
C · Baylor
— · 6'5" · 307 lb

Headline metrics

The four numbers a GM checks first.

JJ Dielman
Predicted pick
#169
range #152–#186
Bust probability
78%
Consensus rank
—
no boards yet
Career arc
arrives after the combineThe forecast needs his measurables first.
2nd-deal AAV
$7Mmodel
Kofi Amichia
Predicted pick
#159
range #145–#173
Bust probability
78%
Consensus rank
—
no boards yet
Career arc
arrives after the combineThe forecast needs his measurables first.
2nd-deal AAV
$7Mmodel
Kyle Fuller
Predicted pick
#83
range #62–#104
Bust probability
22%
Consensus rank
—
no boards yet
Career arc
arrives after the combineThe forecast needs his measurables first.
2nd-deal AAV
$4Mmodel

Feature radar

Each axis is the prospect's percentile among prospects at his position (0–100). Bigger shape = stronger across the board.

ProductionAthleticismAgeConsensusPer-play impact (PPA)Breakout ageWorkloadRAS × production
Prospects
  • JJ Dielman· Offensive line
  • Kofi Amichia· Offensive line
  • Kyle Fuller· Offensive line
Axis leaders
  • ProductionJJ Dielman50
  • AthleticismJJ Dielman29
  • AgeKyle Fuller85
  • ConsensusKofi Amichia3
  • Per-play impact (PPA)JJ Dielman50
  • Breakout ageJJ Dielman50
  • WorkloadJJ Dielman50
  • RAS × productionJJ Dielman43

Comp overlap

Top five historical comps per prospect. Shared comps highlighted.

No shared comps in the top five. Each prospect has a distinct historical profile.
JJ Dielman
  • comps arrive after the combineBefore the combine there isn't enough measured data to match him confidently against past players. Comparisons draw on recent NFL careers (2021–2024) and fill in once combine numbers and game-by-game stats land.
Kofi Amichia
  • comps arrive after the combineBefore the combine there isn't enough measured data to match him confidently against past players. Comparisons draw on recent NFL careers (2021–2024) and fill in once combine numbers and game-by-game stats land.
Kyle Fuller
  • Jamon Brown
    OT · #72
    TBD
  • Jeremiah Poutasi
    G · #66
    TBD
  • Rob Havenstein
    OT · #57
    TBD
  • Laken Tomlinson
    G · #28
    TBD
  • Jon Feliciano
    G · #128
    TBD

Risk and opportunity flags

Top three concerns and top two upside signals from the model.

JJ Dielman
Risks
  • No athletic testing
    No Combine drills or Pro Day numbers on file while most of the class has tested — the athletic part of the grade is unmeasured.
  • Consensus skeptic
    1 board place him at mean rank #260; model has him #169 — a 91-spot gap. When boards fade a player this hard, the model is usually the one missing something.
Opportunities
No standout upside flags.
Kofi Amichia
Risks
  • No athletic testing
    No Combine drills or Pro Day numbers on file while most of the class has tested — the athletic part of the grade is unmeasured.
  • Consensus skeptic
    1 board place him at mean rank #778; model has him #159 — a 619-spot gap. When boards fade a player this hard, the model is usually the one missing something.
Opportunities
  • Mid-major standout
    School SP+ 9.8 (AMERICAN ATHLETIC). Strong program among non-Power-5 — the prospect dominated against decent competition.
Kyle Fuller
Risks
  • Consensus skeptic
    1 board place him at mean rank #198; model has him #83 — a 115-spot gap. When boards fade a player this hard, the model is usually the one missing something.
Opportunities
No standout upside flags.

Career trajectory forecast

Projected share of his team's snaps across the first four NFL seasons. Solid = seasons already played, dashed = the forecast.

0%25%50%75%100%Y1Y2Y3Y4Snap share
JJ DielmanKofi AmichiaKyle Fuller· solid = actuals, dashed = forecast

Verdict

The model's plain-English read.

JJ Dielman

Draftanomics projects JJ Dielman as a mid-round flyer at #169 (range #152-#186, wide band). Bust probability sits at 78% — scary. No Combine drills or Pro Day numbers on file while most of the class has tested — the athletic part of the grade is unmeasured. The call is a conviction buy: the model has him 91 spots ahead of the room (board #169 vs consensus #260) — but size the bet for the 78% bust probability; this is a price edge, not a safety edge.

Kofi Amichia

Draftanomics projects Kofi Amichia as a mid-round flyer at #159 (range #145-#173, wide band). Bust probability sits at 78% — scary. School SP+ 9.8 (AMERICAN ATHLETIC). Strong program among non-Power-5 — the prospect dominated against decent competition. No Combine drills or Pro Day numbers on file while most of the class has tested — the athletic part of the grade is unmeasured. The call is a conviction buy: the model has him 619 spots ahead of the room (board #159 vs consensus #778) — but size the bet for the 78% bust probability; this is a price edge, not a safety edge.

Kyle Fuller

Draftanomics projects Kyle Fuller as a third-round / early Day 3 pick at #83 (range #62-#104, wide band). Bust probability sits at 22% — manageable. The comp set leans young — most of his closest comps haven't played enough NFL snaps yet to be confidently graded. Closest comps: Jamon Brown, Jeremiah Poutasi, Rob Havenstein. Ceiling is Laken Tomlinson; floor is Jon Feliciano. The call is a conviction buy: the model has him 115 spots ahead of the room (board #83 vs consensus #198), and at a 22% bust probability the edge is worth paying for.