Draftanomics
  • 2027 board
  • Consensus board
  • 2028 way-too-early
  • Draft news
  • Simulator
  • The house mock
  • Draft order
  • Trade calculator
  • The Scouting Slate
  • Sleepers & reaches
  • Movers & fallers
  • Player comps
  • Dynasty rookie board
  • Track record
  • Past drafts, re-graded
  • Analyst leaderboard
My rankingsAccount
Get the weekly →
Draftanomics

Honest NFL Draft analytics. The model's receipts against actual NFL teams live on the track record.

Boards
  • 2027 board
  • Consensus board
  • Sleepers
Tools
  • Mock draft simulator
  • Plays Like
  • Dynasty rookie board
Track Record
  • Year-by-year results
  • Accountability Index
  • Our board, on the record
  • Past drafts, re-graded
  • Methodology
  • Developers · free API
  • About
Account
  • My board
  • Weekly email
Data + sources
RAS by Kent Lee Platte·Consensus Big Board (Arif Hasan)·nflverse·PFR·CFBD·All sources & credits·Methodology
Career-value model, live
Privacy·Terms·Press ⌘K to search·Draftanomics2026
  1. Draftanomics/
  2. Prospects/
  3. 2018 board/
  4. Compare

Side-by-side comparison

Backtest

3 prospects · 2018 draft

Each spoke: percentile within the prospect's own position (P)
JS
JK Scott
P · Alabama
22.5 yo · 6'6" · 208 lb
MD
Michael Dickson
P · Texas
22.3 yo · 6'2" · 208 lb
JT
Johnny Townsend
P · Florida
23.2 yo · 6'1" · 210 lb

Headline metrics

The four numbers a GM checks first.

JK Scott
Predicted pick
#85
range #75–#95
Bust probability
29%
Consensus rank
—
no boards yet
Career arc
arrives after the combineThe forecast needs his measurables first.
2nd-deal AAV
$5Mmodel
Michael Dickson
Predicted pick
#59
range #42–#76
Bust probability
30%
Consensus rank
—
no boards yet
Career arc
arrives after the combineThe forecast needs his measurables first.
2nd-deal AAV
$6Mmodel
Johnny Townsend
Predicted pick
#128
range #108–#148
Bust probability
31%
0%0/4 comps
Consensus rank
—
no boards yet
Career arc
Bust
tier · Day 3
2nd-deal AAV
$2Mmodel

Feature radar

Each axis is the prospect's percentile among prospects at his position (0–100). Bigger shape = stronger across the board.

ProductionAthleticismAgeConsensusPer-play impact (PPA)Breakout ageWorkloadRAS × production
Prospects
  • JK Scott· Specialists
  • Michael Dickson· Specialists
  • Johnny Townsend· Specialists
Axis leaders
  • ProductionJK Scott50
  • AthleticismJohnny Townsend34
  • AgeJK Scott100
  • ConsensusJK Scott62
  • Per-play impact (PPA)JK Scott50
  • Breakout ageJK Scott50
  • WorkloadJK Scott50
  • RAS × productionJK Scott50

Comp overlap

Top five historical comps per prospect. Shared comps highlighted.

No shared comps in the top five. Each prospect has a distinct historical profile.
JK Scott
  • comps arrive after the combineBefore the combine there isn't enough measured data to match him confidently against past players. Comparisons draw on recent NFL careers (2021–2024) and fill in once combine numbers and game-by-game stats land.
Michael Dickson
  • comps arrive after the combineBefore the combine there isn't enough measured data to match him confidently against past players. Comparisons draw on recent NFL careers (2021–2024) and fill in once combine numbers and game-by-game stats land.
Johnny Townsend
  • Lac Edwards
    P · #235
    Bust
  • Drew Kaser
    P · #179
    Bust
  • Joe Cardona
    LS · #166
    TBD
  • Bradley Pinion
    P · #165
    Bust
  • Riley Dixon
    P · #228
    Bust

Risk and opportunity flags

Top three concerns and top two upside signals from the model.

JK Scott
Risks
  • Consensus skeptic
    1 board place him at mean rank #211; model has him #85 — a 126-spot gap. When boards fade a player this hard, the model is usually the one missing something.
Opportunities
No standout upside flags.
Michael Dickson
Risks
  • No athletic testing
    No Combine drills or Pro Day numbers on file while most of the class has tested — the athletic part of the grade is unmeasured.
  • Consensus skeptic
    1 board place him at mean rank #105; model has him #59 — a 46-spot gap. When boards fade a player this hard, the model is usually the one missing something.
Opportunities
No standout upside flags.
Johnny Townsend
Risks
  • Older prospect
    Age 23.2 at draft. Slightly older than the cohort median (~22.5); upside ceiling is trimmed.
  • No athletic testing
    No Combine drills or Pro Day numbers on file while most of the class has tested — the athletic part of the grade is unmeasured.
  • Consensus skeptic
    1 board place him at mean rank #235; model has him #128 — a 107-spot gap. When boards fade a player this hard, the model is usually the one missing something.
Opportunities
No standout upside flags.

Career trajectory forecast

Projected share of his team's snaps across the first four NFL seasons. Solid = seasons already played, dashed = the forecast.

0%25%50%75%100%Y1Y2Y3Y4Y5Y6Y7Y8Snap share
JK ScottMichael DicksonJohnny Townsend· solid = actuals, dashed = forecast

Verdict

The model's plain-English read.

JK Scott

Draftanomics projects JK Scott (age 22.5 at draft) as a third-round / early Day 3 pick at #85 (range #75-#95, moderate band). Bust probability sits at 29% — manageable. The call is a conviction buy: the model has him 126 spots ahead of the room (board #85 vs consensus #211), and at a 29% bust probability the edge is worth paying for.

Michael Dickson

Draftanomics projects Michael Dickson (age 22.3 at draft) as a Day 2 pick at #59 (range #42-#76, wide band). Bust probability sits at 30% — manageable. No Combine drills or Pro Day numbers on file while most of the class has tested — the athletic part of the grade is unmeasured. The call is a conviction buy: the model has him 46 spots ahead of the room (board #59 vs consensus #105), and at a 30% bust probability the edge is worth paying for.

Johnny Townsend

Draftanomics projects Johnny Townsend (age 23.2 at draft) as a mid-round flyer at #128 (range #108-#148, wide band). Bust probability sits at 31% — real but not disqualifying. The comp set is dangerous: 4 of 4 closest comps with known NFL outcomes washed out as backups or busts. Closest comps: Lac Edwards (Bust), Drew Kaser (Bust), Joe Cardona. Ceiling is Joe Cardona; floor is Lac Edwards (Bust). 4 of 4 closest comps with NFL outcomes washed out: Lac Edwards, Drew Kaser, Bradley Pinion (+1 more). The neighborhood in feature space is dangerous. The call is a conviction buy: the model has him 107 spots ahead of the room (board #128 vs consensus #235), and at a 31% bust probability the edge is worth paying for.