Draftanomics
  • 2027 board
  • Consensus board
  • 2028 way-too-early
  • Draft news
  • Simulator
  • The house mock
  • Draft order
  • Trade calculator
  • The Scouting Slate
  • Sleepers & reaches
  • Movers & fallers
  • Player comps
  • Dynasty rookie board
  • Track record
  • Past drafts, re-graded
  • Analyst leaderboard
My rankingsAccount
Get the weekly →
Draftanomics

Honest NFL Draft analytics. The model's receipts against actual NFL teams live on the track record.

Boards
  • 2027 board
  • Consensus board
  • Sleepers
Tools
  • Mock draft simulator
  • Plays Like
  • Dynasty rookie board
Track Record
  • Year-by-year results
  • Accountability Index
  • Our board, on the record
  • Past drafts, re-graded
  • Methodology
  • Developers · free API
  • About
Account
  • My board
  • Weekly email
Data + sources
RAS by Kent Lee Platte·Consensus Big Board (Arif Hasan)·nflverse·PFR·CFBD·All sources & credits·Methodology
Career-value model, live
Privacy·Terms·Press ⌘K to search·Draftanomics2026
  1. Draftanomics/
  2. Prospects/
  3. 2018 board/
  4. Compare

Side-by-side comparison

Backtest

2 prospects · 2018 draft

Each spoke: percentile within the prospect's own position (QB)
LW
Logan Woodside
QB · Toledo
23.2 yo · 6'1" · 213 lb
LF
Luke Falk
QB · Washington St.
23.3 yo · 6'4" · 215 lb
Tiebreaker
High confidence
Take Luke Falk over Logan Woodside.

Decisive factor: 94-pick gap on Draftanomics projection. Reinforced by a bust risk 20 points lower and a stronger historical comp arc.

Headline metrics

The four numbers a GM checks first.

Logan Woodside
Predicted pick
#245
range #219–#271
Bust probability· rough estimate
65%
0%comp-based · 0/4
Consensus rank
—
no boards yet
Career arc
Bust
tier · Day 3
2nd-deal AAV
$5Mmodel
Luke Falk
Predicted pick
#151
range #94–#208
Bust probability· rough estimate
45%
0%comp-based · 0/5
Consensus rank
#141
on 4 boards
Career arc
Franchise
tier · Day 3
2nd-deal AAV
$4Mmodel

Feature radar

Each axis is the prospect's percentile among prospects at his position (0–100). Bigger shape = stronger across the board.

ProductionAthleticismAgeConsensusPer-play impact (PPA)Breakout ageWorkloadRAS × production
Prospects
  • Logan Woodside· QB
  • Luke Falk· QB
Axis leaders
  • ProductionLogan Woodside45
  • AthleticismLogan Woodside0
  • AgeLuke Falk22
  • ConsensusLuke Falk6
  • Per-play impact (PPA)Logan Woodside50
  • Breakout ageLogan Woodside50
  • WorkloadLogan Woodside50
  • RAS × productionLogan Woodside0

Comp overlap

Top five historical comps per prospect. Shared comps highlighted.

Shared comps
  • Jake RudockQB · Bust→ shared byLogan WoodsideLuke Falk
  • Connor CookQB · Bust→ shared byLogan WoodsideLuke Falk
Logan Woodside
  • Garrett Grayson
    QB · #75
    TBD
  • Jake Rudockshared
    QB · #191
    Bust
  • Connor Cookshared
    QB · #100
    Bust
  • Bryce Petty
    QB · #103
    Starter
  • Dak Prescott
    QB · #135
    Starter
Luke Falk
  • Sean Mannion
    QB · #89
    Franchise
  • Trevor Siemian
    QB · #250
    Franchise
  • Jake Rudockshared
    QB · #191
    Bust
  • Connor Cookshared
    QB · #100
    Bust
  • Carson Wentz
    QB · #2
    Starter

Risk and opportunity flags

Top three concerns and top two upside signals from the model.

Logan Woodside
Risks
  • Missed entire rookie season
    Drafted #249 by CIN in 2018 but recorded ZERO regular-season NFL snaps. Year-1 absence is one of the strongest single-signal bust predictors we have.
  • Older prospect
    Age 23.2 at draft. Slightly older than the cohort median (~22.5); upside ceiling is trimmed.
  • Comp group has bust risk
    2 of 4 closest comps with NFL outcomes ended up backups or busts: Jake Rudock, Connor Cook. Mixed signal from history.
Opportunities
  • Consensus says higher
    1 board have him at mean rank #210; model has him #245 — a 35-spot fade. Analysts converging this much above the model is a tell that the model is undervaluing him.
Luke Falk
Risks
  • Older prospect
    Age 23.3 at draft. Slightly older than the cohort median (~22.5); upside ceiling is trimmed.
  • Comp group has bust risk
    2 of 5 closest comps with NFL outcomes ended up backups or busts: Jake Rudock, Connor Cook. Mixed signal from history.
Opportunities
  • Consensus says higher
    5 boards have him at mean rank #93; model has him #151 — a 58-spot fade. Analysts converging this much above the model is a tell that the model is undervaluing him.
  • Promising comp group
    3 of 5 closest comps with NFL outcomes hit Starter-or-better: Sean Mannion, Trevor Siemian, Carson Wentz.

Career trajectory forecast

Projected share of his team's snaps across the first four NFL seasons. Solid = seasons already played, dashed = the forecast.

0%25%50%75%100%Y1Y2Y3Y4Y5Y6Snap share
Logan WoodsideLuke Falk· solid = actuals, dashed = forecast

Verdict

The model's plain-English read.

Logan Woodside

Draftanomics projects Logan Woodside (age 23.2 at draft) as a Day 3 dart throw at #245 (range #219-#271, very wide band — too little on him yet to project tightly). Bust probability sits at 65% — scary. The comp set is mixed: 2 starters-or-better vs 2 backups-or-busts among the 4 comps with known outcomes. Closest comps: Garrett Grayson, Jake Rudock (Bust), Connor Cook (Bust). Ceiling is Bryce Petty (Starter); floor is Garrett Grayson. Drafted #249 by CIN in 2018 but recorded ZERO regular-season NFL snaps. Year-1 absence is one of the strongest single-signal bust predictors we have. The call is a genuine fade: the room's consensus prices him around #210 and the model won't take him before #245 — a 35-spot markdown. The discount is earned — missed entire rookie season leads the case against.

Luke Falk

Draftanomics projects Luke Falk (age 23.3 at draft) as a mid-round flyer at #151 (range #94-#208, very wide band — too little on him yet to project tightly). Bust probability sits at 45% — real but not disqualifying. The comp set is strong: 3 of 5 closest comps with known NFL outcomes became starters or better. Closest comps: Sean Mannion (Franchise), Trevor Siemian (Franchise), Jake Rudock (Bust). Ceiling is Sean Mannion (Franchise); floor is Carson Wentz (Starter). Age 23.3 at draft. Slightly older than the cohort median (~22.5); upside ceiling is trimmed. The call is a genuine fade: the room's consensus prices him around #93 and the model won't take him before #151 — a 58-spot markdown. The discount is earned — older prospect leads the case against.