Draftanomics
  • 2027 board
  • Consensus board
  • 2028 way-too-early
  • Draft news
  • Simulator
  • The house mock
  • Draft order
  • Trade calculator
  • The Scouting Slate
  • Sleepers & reaches
  • Movers & fallers
  • Player comps
  • Dynasty rookie board
  • Track record
  • Past drafts, re-graded
  • Analyst leaderboard
My rankingsAccount
Get the weekly →
Draftanomics

Honest NFL Draft analytics. The model's receipts against actual NFL teams live on the track record.

Boards
  • 2027 board
  • Consensus board
  • Sleepers
Tools
  • Mock draft simulator
  • Plays Like
  • Dynasty rookie board
Track Record
  • Year-by-year results
  • Accountability Index
  • Our board, on the record
  • Past drafts, re-graded
  • Methodology
  • Developers · free API
  • About
Account
  • My board
  • Weekly email
Data + sources
RAS by Kent Lee Platte·Consensus Big Board (Arif Hasan)·nflverse·PFR·CFBD·All sources & credits·Methodology
Career-value model, live
Privacy·Terms·Press ⌘K to search·Draftanomics2026
  1. Draftanomics/
  2. Prospects/
  3. 2018 board/
  4. Compare

Side-by-side comparison

Backtest

2 prospects · 2018 draft

Each spoke: percentile within the prospect's own position (TE)
DS
Durham Smythe
TE · Notre Dame
22.7 yo · 6'5" · 253 lb
JT
Jordan Thomas
TE · Mississippi St.
21.7 yo · — · —
Tiebreaker
High confidence
Take Jordan Thomas over Durham Smythe.

Decisive factor: 11-pick gap on Draftanomics projection. Reinforced by a bust risk 7 points lower.

Headline metrics

The four numbers a GM checks first.

Durham Smythe
Predicted pick
#251
range #211–#291
Bust probability
7%
0%0/4 comps
Consensus rank
#134
on 1 board
Career arc
Starter
tier · Day 3
2nd-deal AAV
$6Mmodel
Jordan Thomas
Predicted pick
#240
range #233–#247
Bust probability
0%
Consensus rank
—
no boards yet
Career arc
arrives after the combineThe forecast needs his measurables first.
2nd-deal AAV
$2Mmodel

Feature radar

Each axis is the prospect's percentile among prospects at his position (0–100). Bigger shape = stronger across the board.

ProductionAthleticismAgeConsensusPer-play impact (PPA)Breakout ageWorkloadRAS × production
Prospects
  • Durham Smythe· RB / WR / TE
  • Jordan Thomas· RB / WR / TE
Axis leaders
  • ProductionDurham Smythe47
  • AthleticismDurham Smythe47
  • AgeJordan Thomas82
  • ConsensusDurham Smythe10
  • Per-play impact (PPA)Durham Smythe50
  • Breakout ageDurham Smythe50
  • WorkloadJordan Thomas100
  • RAS × productionDurham Smythe0

Comp overlap

Top five historical comps per prospect. Shared comps highlighted.

No shared comps in the top five. Each prospect has a distinct historical profile.
Durham Smythe
  • Nick Vannett
    TE · #94
    Starter
  • Thomas Duarte
    TE · #231
    Bust
  • Rico Gathers
    TE · #217
    TBD
  • Jeff Heuerman
    TE · #92
    Starter
  • Nick O'Leary
    TE · #194
    Starter
Jordan Thomas
  • comps arrive after the combineBefore the combine there isn't enough measured data to match him confidently against past players. Comparisons draw on recent NFL careers (2021–2024) and fill in once combine numbers and game-by-game stats land.

Risk and opportunity flags

Top three concerns and top two upside signals from the model.

Durham Smythe
Risks
  • TE slow 40 (4.81s)
    40-yard dash of 4.81s — below-average separation speed for the position.
Opportunities
  • Consensus says higher
    2 boards have him at mean rank #138; model has him #251 — a 114-spot fade. Analysts converging this much above the model is a tell that the model is undervaluing him.
  • Strong comp group
    3 of 4 closest comps with NFL outcomes became Starters or Franchise players: Nick Vannett, Jeff Heuerman, Nick O'Leary. The historical neighborhood overwhelmingly produced NFL contributors.
Jordan Thomas
Risks
  • No athletic testing
    No Combine drills or Pro Day numbers on file while most of the class has tested — the athletic part of the grade is unmeasured.
  • Consensus skeptic
    1 board place him at mean rank #316; model has him #240 — a 76-spot gap. When boards fade a player this hard, the model is usually the one missing something.
Opportunities
No standout upside flags.

Career trajectory forecast

Projected share of his team's snaps across the first four NFL seasons. Solid = seasons already played, dashed = the forecast.

0%25%50%75%100%Y1Y2Y3Y4Y5Y6Y7Y8Snap share
Durham SmytheJordan Thomas· solid = actuals, dashed = forecast

Verdict

The model's plain-English read.

Durham Smythe

Draftanomics projects Durham Smythe (age 22.7 at draft) as a Day 3 dart throw at #251 (range #211-#291, very wide band — too little on him yet to project tightly). Bust probability sits at 6% — low. The comp set is strong: 3 of 4 closest comps with known NFL outcomes became starters or better. Closest comps: Nick Vannett (Starter), Thomas Duarte (Bust), Rico Gathers. Ceiling is Jeff Heuerman (Starter); floor is Rico Gathers. 40-yard dash of 4.81s — below-average separation speed for the position. The call is a genuine fade: the room's consensus prices him around #138 and the model won't take him before #251 — a 114-spot markdown. The discount is earned — te slow 40 (4.81s) leads the case against.

Jordan Thomas

Draftanomics projects Jordan Thomas (age 21.7 at draft) as a Day 3 dart throw at #240 (range #233-#247, moderate band). Bust probability sits at 0% — low. No Combine drills or Pro Day numbers on file while most of the class has tested — the athletic part of the grade is unmeasured. The call is a conviction buy: the model has him 76 spots ahead of the room (board #240 vs consensus #316), and at a 0% bust probability the edge is worth paying for.