Draftanomics
  • 2027 board
  • Consensus board
  • 2028 way-too-early
  • Draft news
  • Simulator
  • The house mock
  • Draft order
  • Trade calculator
  • The Scouting Slate
  • Sleepers & reaches
  • Movers & fallers
  • Player comps
  • Dynasty rookie board
  • Track record
  • Past drafts, re-graded
  • Analyst leaderboard
My rankingsAccount
Get the weekly →
Draftanomics

Honest NFL Draft analytics. The model's receipts against actual NFL teams live on the track record.

Boards
  • 2027 board
  • Consensus board
  • Sleepers
Tools
  • Mock draft simulator
  • Plays Like
  • Dynasty rookie board
Track Record
  • Year-by-year results
  • Accountability Index
  • Our board, on the record
  • Past drafts, re-graded
  • Methodology
  • Developers · free API
  • About
Account
  • My board
  • Weekly email
Data + sources
RAS by Kent Lee Platte·Consensus Big Board (Arif Hasan)·nflverse·PFR·CFBD·All sources & credits·Methodology
Career-value model, live
Privacy·Terms·Press ⌘K to search·Draftanomics2026
  1. Draftanomics/
  2. Prospects/
  3. 2019 board/
  4. Compare

Side-by-side comparison

Backtest

2 prospects · 2019 draft

Each spoke: percentile within the prospect's own position (EDGE)
CO
Charles Omenihu
EDGE · Texas
21.7 yo · — · —
JJ
Joe Jackson
EDGE · Miami (FL)
22.3 yo · — · —
Tiebreaker
High confidence
Take Charles Omenihu over Joe Jackson.

Decisive factor: a bust risk 45 points lower. Reinforced by a stronger historical comp arc and 11-pick gap on Draftanomics projection.

Headline metrics

The four numbers a GM checks first.

Charles Omenihu
Predicted pick
#138
range #114–#162
Bust probability
0%
0%0/5 comps
Consensus rank
#71
on 21 boards
Career arc
Bust
tier · Day 3
2nd-deal AAV
$6Mmodel
Joe Jackson
Predicted pick
#149
range #124–#174
Bust probability
45%
0%0/5 comps
Consensus rank
#80
on 7 boards
Career arc
Bust
tier · Day 3
2nd-deal AAV
$5Mmodel

Feature radar

Each axis is the prospect's percentile among prospects at his position (0–100). Bigger shape = stronger across the board.

ProductionAthleticismAgeConsensusPer-play impact (PPA)Breakout ageWorkloadRAS × production
Prospects
  • Charles Omenihu· EDGE / DL / LB
  • Joe Jackson· EDGE / DL / LB
Axis leaders
  • ProductionCharles Omenihu38
  • AthleticismCharles Omenihu41
  • AgeJoe Jackson87
  • ConsensusJoe Jackson21
  • Per-play impact (PPA)Charles Omenihu50
  • Breakout ageCharles Omenihu50
  • WorkloadCharles Omenihu100
  • RAS × productionCharles Omenihu0

Comp overlap

Top five historical comps per prospect. Shared comps highlighted.

Shared comps
  • Takkarist McKinleyEDGE · Bust→ shared byCharles OmenihuJoe Jackson
  • Jihad WardEDGE · Starter→ shared byCharles OmenihuJoe Jackson
Charles Omenihu
  • Takkarist McKinleyshared
    EDGE · #26
    Bust
  • Kamalei Correa
    EDGE · #42
    Contributor
  • Carl Nassib
    EDGE · #65
    Starter
  • Jihad Wardshared
    EDGE · #44
    Starter
  • Deatrich Wise Jr.
    EDGE · #131
    Bust
Joe Jackson
  • Jihad Wardshared
    EDGE · #44
    Starter
  • Tanoh Kpassagnon
    EDGE · #59
    Bust
  • Tarell Basham
    EDGE · #80
    Bust
  • Dean Lowry
    EDGE · #137
    Starter
  • Takkarist McKinleyshared
    EDGE · #26
    Bust

Risk and opportunity flags

Top three concerns and top two upside signals from the model.

Charles Omenihu
Risks
  • No athletic testing
    No Combine drills or Pro Day numbers on file while most of the class has tested — the athletic part of the grade is unmeasured.
  • Comp group has bust risk
    2 of 4 closest comps with NFL outcomes ended up backups or busts: Takkarist McKinley, Deatrich Wise Jr.. Mixed signal from history.
Opportunities
  • Consensus says higher
    22 boards have him at mean rank #74; model has him #138 — a 64-spot fade. Analysts converging this much above the model is a tell that the model is undervaluing him.
Joe Jackson
Risks
  • No athletic testing
    No Combine drills or Pro Day numbers on file while most of the class has tested — the athletic part of the grade is unmeasured.
  • Comp group bust rate
    3 of 5 closest comps with NFL outcomes washed out: Tanoh Kpassagnon, Tarell Basham, Takkarist McKinley. The neighborhood in feature space is dangerous.
Opportunities
  • Consensus says higher
    8 boards have him at mean rank #81; model has him #149 — a 68-spot fade. Analysts converging this much above the model is a tell that the model is undervaluing him.

Career trajectory forecast

Projected share of his team's snaps across the first four NFL seasons. Solid = seasons already played, dashed = the forecast.

0%25%50%75%100%Y1Y2Y3Y4Y5Y6Y7Snap share
Charles OmenihuJoe Jackson· solid = actuals, dashed = forecast

Verdict

The model's plain-English read.

Charles Omenihu

Draftanomics projects Charles Omenihu (age 21.7 at draft) as a mid-round flyer at #138 (range #114-#162, wide band). Bust probability sits at 0% — low. The comp set is mixed: 2 starters-or-better vs 2 backups-or-busts among the 4 comps with known outcomes. Closest comps: Takkarist McKinley (Bust), Kamalei Correa (Contributor), Carl Nassib (Starter). Ceiling is Jihad Ward (Starter); floor is Kamalei Correa (Contributor). No Combine drills or Pro Day numbers on file while most of the class has tested — the athletic part of the grade is unmeasured. The call is a genuine fade: the room's consensus prices him around #74 and the model won't take him before #138 — a 64-spot markdown. The discount is earned — comp group has bust risk leads the case against.

Joe Jackson

Draftanomics projects Joe Jackson (age 22.3 at draft) as a mid-round flyer at #149 (range #124-#174, wide band). Bust probability sits at 45% — real but not disqualifying. The comp set is dangerous: 3 of 5 closest comps with known NFL outcomes washed out as backups or busts. Closest comps: Jihad Ward (Starter), Tanoh Kpassagnon (Bust), Tarell Basham (Bust). Ceiling is Jihad Ward (Starter); floor is Dean Lowry (Starter). 3 of 5 closest comps with NFL outcomes washed out: Tanoh Kpassagnon, Tarell Basham, Takkarist McKinley. The neighborhood in feature space is dangerous. The call is a genuine fade: the room's consensus prices him around #81 and the model won't take him before #149 — a 68-spot markdown. The discount is earned — comp group bust rate leads the case against.