Draftanomics
  • 2027 board
  • Consensus board
  • 2028 way-too-early
  • Draft news
  • Simulator
  • The house mock
  • Draft order
  • Trade calculator
  • The Scouting Slate
  • Sleepers & reaches
  • Movers & fallers
  • Player comps
  • Dynasty rookie board
  • Track record
  • Past drafts, re-graded
  • Analyst leaderboard
My rankingsAccount
Get the weekly →
Draftanomics

Honest NFL Draft analytics. The model's receipts against actual NFL teams live on the track record.

Boards
  • 2027 board
  • Consensus board
  • Sleepers
Tools
  • Mock draft simulator
  • Plays Like
  • Dynasty rookie board
Track Record
  • Year-by-year results
  • Accountability Index
  • Our board, on the record
  • Past drafts, re-graded
  • Methodology
  • Developers · free API
  • About
Account
  • My board
  • Weekly email
Data + sources
RAS by Kent Lee Platte·Consensus Big Board (Arif Hasan)·nflverse·PFR·CFBD·All sources & credits·Methodology
Career-value model, live
Privacy·Terms·Press ⌘K to search·Draftanomics2026
  1. Draftanomics/
  2. Prospects/
  3. 2019 board/
  4. Compare

Side-by-side comparison

Backtest

3 prospects · 2019 draft

Each spoke: percentile within the prospect's own position (C)
EJ
Elgton Jenkins
C · Mississippi St.
— · — · —
GB
Garrett Bradbury
C · North Carolina St.
— · — · —
EM
Erik McCoy
C · Texas A&M
— · — · —

Headline metrics

The four numbers a GM checks first.

Elgton Jenkins
Predicted pick
#53
range #39–#67
Bust probability
0%
Consensus rank
#64
on 24 boards
Career arc
arrives after the combineThe forecast needs his measurables first.
2nd-deal AAV
$25Mmodel
Garrett Bradbury
Predicted pick
#13
range #1–#27
Bust probability
0%
Consensus rank
#21
on 27 boards
Career arc
arrives after the combineThe forecast needs his measurables first.
2nd-deal AAV
$11Mmodel
Erik McCoy
Predicted pick
#4
range #1–#57
Bust probability
0%
Consensus rank
#40
on 25 boards
Career arc
arrives after the combineThe forecast needs his measurables first.
2nd-deal AAV
$17Mmodel

Feature radar

Each axis is the prospect's percentile among prospects at his position (0–100). Bigger shape = stronger across the board.

ProductionAthleticismAgeConsensusPer-play impact (PPA)Breakout ageWorkloadRAS × production
Prospects
  • Elgton Jenkins· Offensive line
  • Garrett Bradbury· Offensive line
  • Erik McCoy· Offensive line
Axis leaders
  • ProductionElgton Jenkins50
  • AthleticismElgton Jenkins31
  • AgeElgton Jenkins70
  • ConsensusGarrett Bradbury68
  • Per-play impact (PPA)Elgton Jenkins50
  • Breakout ageElgton Jenkins50
  • WorkloadElgton Jenkins50
  • RAS × productionElgton Jenkins31

Comp overlap

Top five historical comps per prospect. Shared comps highlighted.

No shared comps in the top five. Each prospect has a distinct historical profile.
Elgton Jenkins
  • comps arrive after the combineBefore the combine there isn't enough measured data to match him confidently against past players. Comparisons draw on recent NFL careers (2021–2024) and fill in once combine numbers and game-by-game stats land.
Garrett Bradbury
  • comps arrive after the combineBefore the combine there isn't enough measured data to match him confidently against past players. Comparisons draw on recent NFL careers (2021–2024) and fill in once combine numbers and game-by-game stats land.
Erik McCoy
  • Pat Elflein
    C · #70
    TBD
  • Ryan Kelly
    C · #18
    TBD
  • Graham Glasgow
    C · #95
    TBD
  • Austin Blythe
    C · #248
    TBD
  • Ethan Pocic
    C · #58
    TBD

Risk and opportunity flags

Top three concerns and top two upside signals from the model.

Elgton Jenkins
Risks
  • No athletic testing
    No Combine drills or Pro Day numbers on file while most of the class has tested — the athletic part of the grade is unmeasured.
Opportunities
No standout upside flags.
Garrett Bradbury
Risks
  • No athletic testing
    No Combine drills or Pro Day numbers on file while most of the class has tested — the athletic part of the grade is unmeasured.
Opportunities
No standout upside flags.
Erik McCoy
Risks
  • No athletic testing
    No Combine drills or Pro Day numbers on file while most of the class has tested — the athletic part of the grade is unmeasured.
  • Consensus skeptic
    27 boards place him at mean rank #43; model has him #4 — a 39-spot gap. When boards fade a player this hard, the model is usually the one missing something.
Opportunities
No standout upside flags.

Career trajectory forecast

Projected share of his team's snaps across the first four NFL seasons. Solid = seasons already played, dashed = the forecast.

0%25%50%75%100%Y1Y2Y3Y4Y5Y6Y7Snap share
Elgton JenkinsGarrett BradburyErik McCoy· solid = actuals, dashed = forecast

Verdict

The model's plain-English read.

Elgton Jenkins

Draftanomics projects Elgton Jenkins as a Day 2 pick at #53 (range #39-#67, wide band). Bust probability sits at 0% — low. No Combine drills or Pro Day numbers on file while most of the class has tested — the athletic part of the grade is unmeasured. The call is a hold at slot: the model's #53 sits within 11 spots of the room's #64 — no market edge to chase, so take him where he sits, and let the 0% bust probability break ties on draft day.

Garrett Bradbury

Draftanomics projects Garrett Bradbury as a first-round pick at #13 (range #1-#27, wide band). Bust probability sits at 0% — low. No Combine drills or Pro Day numbers on file while most of the class has tested — the athletic part of the grade is unmeasured. The call is a hold at slot: the model's #13 sits within 9 spots of the room's #22 — no market edge to chase, so take him where he sits, and let the 0% bust probability break ties on draft day.

Erik McCoy

Draftanomics projects Erik McCoy as a top-10 pick at #4 (range #1-#57, very wide band — too little on him yet to project tightly). Bust probability sits at 0% — low. The comp set leans young — most of his closest comps haven't played enough NFL snaps yet to be confidently graded. Closest comps: Pat Elflein, Ryan Kelly, Graham Glasgow. Ceiling is Ryan Kelly; floor is Austin Blythe. No Combine drills or Pro Day numbers on file while most of the class has tested — the athletic part of the grade is unmeasured. The call is a conviction buy: the model has him 39 spots ahead of the room (board #4 vs consensus #43), and at a 0% bust probability the edge is worth paying for.