Draftanomics
  • 2027 board
  • Consensus board
  • 2028 way-too-early
  • Draft news
  • Simulator
  • The house mock
  • Draft order
  • Trade calculator
  • The Scouting Slate
  • Sleepers & reaches
  • Movers & fallers
  • Player comps
  • Dynasty rookie board
  • Track record
  • Past drafts, re-graded
  • Analyst leaderboard
My rankingsAccount
Get the weekly →
Draftanomics

Honest NFL Draft analytics. The model's receipts against actual NFL teams live on the track record.

Boards
  • 2027 board
  • Consensus board
  • Sleepers
Tools
  • Mock draft simulator
  • Plays Like
  • Dynasty rookie board
Track Record
  • Year-by-year results
  • Accountability Index
  • Our board, on the record
  • Past drafts, re-graded
  • Methodology
  • Developers · free API
  • About
Account
  • My board
  • Weekly email
Data + sources
RAS by Kent Lee Platte·Consensus Big Board (Arif Hasan)·nflverse·PFR·CFBD·All sources & credits·Methodology
Career-value model, live
Privacy·Terms·Press ⌘K to search·Draftanomics2026
  1. Draftanomics/
  2. Prospects/
  3. 2020 board/
  4. Compare

Side-by-side comparison

Backtest

2 prospects · 2020 draft

Each spoke: percentile within the prospect's own position (TE)
DA
Devin Asiasi
TE · UCLA
22.7 yo · 6'3" · 257 lb
CK
Cole Kmet
TE · Notre Dame
21.1 yo · 6'6" · 262 lb
Tiebreaker
High confidence
Take Cole Kmet over Devin Asiasi.

Decisive factor: 136-pick gap on Draftanomics projection. Reinforced by a bust risk 57 points lower and $14M/yr more in projected second-deal AAV.

Headline metrics

The four numbers a GM checks first.

Devin Asiasi
Predicted pick
#249
range #214–#284
Bust probability
57%
0%0/5 comps
Consensus rank
#146
on 2 boards
Career arc
Starter
tier · Day 3
2nd-deal AAV
$2Mmodel
Cole Kmet
Predicted pick
#113
range #82–#144
Bust probability
0%
0%0/4 comps
Consensus rank
#67
on 24 boards
Career arc
Bust
tier · Day 3
2nd-deal AAV
$17Mmodel

Feature radar

Each axis is the prospect's percentile among prospects at his position (0–100). Bigger shape = stronger across the board.

ProductionAthleticismAgeConsensusPer-play impact (PPA)Breakout ageWorkloadRAS × production
Prospects
  • Devin Asiasi· RB / WR / TE
  • Cole Kmet· RB / WR / TE
Axis leaders
  • ProductionDevin Asiasi0
  • AthleticismDevin Asiasi37
  • AgeCole Kmet70
  • ConsensusCole Kmet20
  • Per-play impact (PPA)Devin Asiasi50
  • Breakout ageDevin Asiasi50
  • WorkloadDevin Asiasi100
  • RAS × productionDevin Asiasi0

Comp overlap

Top five historical comps per prospect. Shared comps highlighted.

Shared comps
  • Ian ThomasTE · Starter→ shared byDevin AsiasiCole Kmet
Devin Asiasi
  • Ian Thomasshared
    TE · #101
    Starter
  • Malcolm Johnson
    TE · #195
    Starter
  • Gerald Everett
    TE · #44
    Bust
  • Tyler Conklin
    TE · #157
    Starter
  • Mark Andrews
    TE · #86
    Starter
Cole Kmet
  • Evan Engram
    TE · #23
    Bust
  • David Njoku
    TE · #29
    Bust
  • Ian Thomasshared
    TE · #101
    Starter
  • Austin Hooper
    TE · #81
    Starter
  • Jordan Leggett
    TE · #150
    TBD

Risk and opportunity flags

Top three concerns and top two upside signals from the model.

Devin Asiasi
Risks
  • Average-to-below athletic profile
    RAS 4.44 (44th percentile at TE). Athleticism is average at best for the position.
  • TE slow 40 (4.73s)
    40-yard dash of 4.73s — below-average separation speed for the position.
Opportunities
  • Consensus says higher
    3 boards have him at mean rank #83; model has him #249 — a 166-spot fade. Analysts converging this much above the model is a tell that the model is undervaluing him.
  • Strong comp group
    4 of 5 closest comps with NFL outcomes became Starters or Franchise players: Ian Thomas, Malcolm Johnson, Tyler Conklin (+1 more). The historical neighborhood overwhelmingly produced NFL contributors.
Cole Kmet
Risks
  • TE slow 40 (4.70s)
    40-yard dash of 4.70s — below-average separation speed for the position.
  • Comp group has bust risk
    2 of 4 closest comps with NFL outcomes ended up backups or busts: Evan Engram, David Njoku. Mixed signal from history.
  • Below-cohort college production
    Position-cohort z-score on production composite is -1.24 — well below the skill average. Raw box-score output didn't keep pace with peers.
Opportunities
  • Consensus says higher
    26 boards have him at mean rank #66; model has him #113 — a 47-spot fade. Analysts converging this much above the model is a tell that the model is undervaluing him.
  • Mid-major standout
    School SP+ 17.7 (FBS INDEPENDENTS). Strong program among non-Power-5 — the prospect dominated against decent competition.

Career trajectory forecast

Projected share of his team's snaps across the first four NFL seasons. Solid = seasons already played, dashed = the forecast.

0%25%50%75%100%Y1Y2Y3Y4Y5Y6Snap share
Devin AsiasiCole Kmet· solid = actuals, dashed = forecast

Verdict

The model's plain-English read.

Devin Asiasi

Draftanomics projects Devin Asiasi (age 22.7 at draft) as a Day 3 dart throw at #249 (range #214-#284, very wide band — too little on him yet to project tightly). Bust probability sits at 57% — elevated. The comp set is strong: 4 of 5 closest comps with known NFL outcomes became starters or better. Closest comps: Ian Thomas (Starter), Malcolm Johnson (Starter), Gerald Everett (Bust). Ceiling is Mark Andrews (Starter); floor is Malcolm Johnson (Starter). RAS 4.44 (44th percentile at TE). Athleticism is average at best for the position. The call is a genuine fade: the room's consensus prices him around #83 and the model won't take him before #249 — a 166-spot markdown. The discount is earned — average-to-below athletic profile leads the case against.

Cole Kmet

Draftanomics projects Cole Kmet (age 21.1 at draft) as a mid-round flyer at #113 (range #82-#144, very wide band — too little on him yet to project tightly). Bust probability sits at 0% — low. The comp set is mixed: 2 starters-or-better vs 2 backups-or-busts among the 4 comps with known outcomes. Closest comps: Evan Engram (Bust), David Njoku (Bust), Ian Thomas (Starter). Ceiling is Austin Hooper (Starter); floor is Jordan Leggett. School SP+ 17.7 (FBS INDEPENDENTS). Strong program among non-Power-5 — the prospect dominated against decent competition. 40-yard dash of 4.70s — below-average separation speed for the position. The call is a genuine fade: the room's consensus prices him around #66 and the model won't take him before #113 — a 47-spot markdown. The discount is earned — te slow 40 (4.70s) leads the case against.