Draftanomics
  • 2027 board
  • Consensus board
  • 2028 way-too-early
  • Draft news
  • Simulator
  • The house mock
  • Draft order
  • Trade calculator
  • The Scouting Slate
  • Sleepers & reaches
  • Movers & fallers
  • Player comps
  • Dynasty rookie board
  • Track record
  • Past drafts, re-graded
  • Analyst leaderboard
My rankingsAccount
Get the weekly →
Draftanomics

Honest NFL Draft analytics. The model's receipts against actual NFL teams live on the track record.

Boards
  • 2027 board
  • Consensus board
  • Sleepers
Tools
  • Mock draft simulator
  • Plays Like
  • Dynasty rookie board
Track Record
  • Year-by-year results
  • Accountability Index
  • Our board, on the record
  • Past drafts, re-graded
  • Methodology
  • Developers · free API
  • About
Account
  • My board
  • Weekly email
Data + sources
RAS by Kent Lee Platte·Consensus Big Board (Arif Hasan)·nflverse·PFR·CFBD·All sources & credits·Methodology
Career-value model, live
Privacy·Terms·Press ⌘K to search·Draftanomics2026
  1. Draftanomics/
  2. Prospects/
  3. 2020 board/
  4. Compare

Side-by-side comparison

Backtest

3 prospects · 2020 draft

Each spoke: percentile within the prospect's own position (LB)
JG
Jordan Glasgow
LB · Michigan
23.8 yo · — · —
TD
Troy Dye
LB · Oregon
23.6 yo · 6'3" · 231 lb
CJ
Clay Johnston
LB · Baylor
23.7 yo · 6'1" · 227 lb

Headline metrics

The four numbers a GM checks first.

Jordan Glasgow
Predicted pick
#209
range #181–#237
Bust probability
45%
0%0/5 comps
Consensus rank
—
no boards yet
Career arc
Bust
tier · Day 3
2nd-deal AAV
$3Mmodel
Troy Dye
Predicted pick
#109
range #66–#152
Bust probability
15%
0%0/5 comps
Consensus rank
#102
on 12 boards
Career arc
Bust
tier · Day 3
2nd-deal AAV
$3Mmodel
Clay Johnston
Predicted pick
#194
range #146–#242
Bust probability
46%
0%0/5 comps
Consensus rank
—
no boards yet
Career arc
Bust
tier · Day 3
2nd-deal AAV
$2Mmodel

Feature radar

Each axis is the prospect's percentile among prospects at his position (0–100). Bigger shape = stronger across the board.

ProductionAthleticismAgeConsensusPer-play impact (PPA)Breakout ageWorkloadRAS × production
Prospects
  • Jordan Glasgow· EDGE / DL / LB
  • Troy Dye· EDGE / DL / LB
  • Clay Johnston· EDGE / DL / LB
Axis leaders
  • ProductionJordan Glasgow0
  • AthleticismJordan Glasgow29
  • AgeTroy Dye23
  • ConsensusJordan Glasgow5
  • Per-play impact (PPA)Jordan Glasgow50
  • Breakout ageJordan Glasgow50
  • WorkloadJordan Glasgow100
  • RAS × productionTroy Dye54

Comp overlap

Top five historical comps per prospect. Shared comps highlighted.

Shared comps
  • Peter KalambayiLB · Bust→ shared byJordan GlasgowTroy DyeClay Johnston
  • Quentin PolingLB · Bust→ shared byJordan GlasgowClay Johnston
  • Vince BiegelLB · Bust→ shared byJordan GlasgowTroy Dye
  • Jermaine Carter Jr.LB · Contributor→ shared byJordan GlasgowClay Johnston
  • Shaquille LeonardLB · Franchise→ shared byTroy DyeClay Johnston
Jordan Glasgow
  • Quentin Polingshared
    LB · #227
    Bust
  • Vince Biegelshared
    LB · #108
    Bust
  • Antwione Williams
    LB · #169
    Bust
  • Jermaine Carter Jr.shared
    LB · #161
    Contributor
  • Peter Kalambayishared
    LB · #214
    Bust
Troy Dye
  • Joel Iyiegbuniwe
    LB · #115
    Bust
  • Shaquille Leonardshared
    LB · #36
    Franchise
  • Peter Kalambayishared
    LB · #214
    Bust
  • Vince Biegelshared
    LB · #108
    Bust
  • Shaun Dion Hamilton
    LB · #197
    Contributor
Clay Johnston
  • Quentin Polingshared
    LB · #227
    Bust
  • Jermaine Carter Jr.shared
    LB · #161
    Contributor
  • Matthew Adams
    LB · #221
    Bust
  • Peter Kalambayishared
    LB · #214
    Bust
  • Shaquille Leonardshared
    LB · #36
    Franchise

Risk and opportunity flags

Top three concerns and top two upside signals from the model.

Jordan Glasgow
Risks
  • Older prospect
    Age 23.8 at draft. Slightly older than the cohort median (~22.5); upside ceiling is trimmed.
  • No athletic testing
    No Combine drills or Pro Day numbers on file while most of the class has tested — the athletic part of the grade is unmeasured.
  • Comp group bust rate
    4 of 4 closest comps with NFL outcomes washed out: Quentin Poling, Vince Biegel, Antwione Williams (+1 more). The neighborhood in feature space is dangerous.
Opportunities
No standout upside flags.
Troy Dye
Risks
  • Older prospect
    Age 23.6 at draft. Slightly older than the cohort median (~22.5); upside ceiling is trimmed.
  • Comp group bust rate
    3 of 4 closest comps with NFL outcomes washed out: Joel Iyiegbuniwe, Peter Kalambayi, Vince Biegel. The neighborhood in feature space is dangerous.
Opportunities
No standout upside flags.
Clay Johnston
Risks
  • Older prospect
    Age 23.7 at draft. Slightly older than the cohort median (~22.5); upside ceiling is trimmed.
  • Comp group bust rate
    3 of 4 closest comps with NFL outcomes washed out: Quentin Poling, Matthew Adams, Peter Kalambayi. The neighborhood in feature space is dangerous.
Opportunities
No standout upside flags.

Career trajectory forecast

Projected share of his team's snaps across the first four NFL seasons. Solid = seasons already played, dashed = the forecast.

0%25%50%75%100%Y1Y2Y3Y4Y5Y6Snap share
Jordan GlasgowTroy DyeClay Johnston· solid = actuals, dashed = forecast

Verdict

The model's plain-English read.

Jordan Glasgow

Draftanomics projects Jordan Glasgow (age 23.8 at draft) as a Day 3 dart throw at #209 (range #181-#237, very wide band — too little on him yet to project tightly). Bust probability sits at 45% — elevated. The comp set is dangerous: 4 of 4 closest comps with known NFL outcomes washed out as backups or busts. Closest comps: Quentin Poling (Bust), Vince Biegel (Bust), Antwione Williams (Bust). Ceiling is Jermaine Carter Jr. (Contributor); floor is Quentin Poling (Bust). 4 of 4 closest comps with NFL outcomes washed out: Quentin Poling, Vince Biegel, Antwione Williams (+1 more). The neighborhood in feature space is dangerous. The call is a hold: no public board ranks him, so the model's #209 stands alone — and with bust risk at 45%, let the room catch up before paying a premium.

Troy Dye

Draftanomics projects Troy Dye (age 23.6 at draft) as a mid-round flyer at #109 (range #66-#152, very wide band — too little on him yet to project tightly). Bust probability sits at 15% — manageable. The comp set is dangerous: 3 of 4 closest comps with known NFL outcomes washed out as backups or busts. Closest comps: Joel Iyiegbuniwe (Bust), Shaquille Leonard (Franchise), Peter Kalambayi (Bust). Ceiling is Shaquille Leonard (Franchise); floor is Shaun Dion Hamilton (Contributor). 3 of 4 closest comps with NFL outcomes washed out: Joel Iyiegbuniwe, Peter Kalambayi, Vince Biegel. The neighborhood in feature space is dangerous. The call is a lean fade: the model sits 27 spots below the room's consensus #82 — don't pay sticker price. The discount is earned — older prospect leads the case against.

Clay Johnston

Draftanomics projects Clay Johnston (age 23.7 at draft) as a Day 3 dart throw at #194 (range #146-#242, very wide band — too little on him yet to project tightly). Bust probability sits at 46% — elevated. The comp set is dangerous: 3 of 4 closest comps with known NFL outcomes washed out as backups or busts. Closest comps: Quentin Poling (Bust), Jermaine Carter Jr. (Contributor), Matthew Adams (Bust). Ceiling is Shaquille Leonard (Franchise); floor is Jermaine Carter Jr. (Contributor). 3 of 4 closest comps with NFL outcomes washed out: Quentin Poling, Matthew Adams, Peter Kalambayi. The neighborhood in feature space is dangerous. The call is a hold: no public board ranks him, so the model's #194 stands alone — and with bust risk at 46%, let the room catch up before paying a premium.