Draftanomics
  • 2027 board
  • Consensus board
  • 2028 way-too-early
  • Draft news
  • Simulator
  • The house mock
  • Draft order
  • Trade calculator
  • The Scouting Slate
  • Sleepers & reaches
  • Movers & fallers
  • Player comps
  • Dynasty rookie board
  • Track record
  • Past drafts, re-graded
  • Analyst leaderboard
My rankingsAccount
Get the weekly →
Draftanomics

Honest NFL Draft analytics. The model's receipts against actual NFL teams live on the track record.

Boards
  • 2027 board
  • Consensus board
  • Sleepers
Tools
  • Mock draft simulator
  • Plays Like
  • Dynasty rookie board
Track Record
  • Year-by-year results
  • Accountability Index
  • Our board, on the record
  • Past drafts, re-graded
  • Methodology
  • Developers · free API
  • About
Account
  • My board
  • Weekly email
Data + sources
RAS by Kent Lee Platte·Consensus Big Board (Arif Hasan)·nflverse·PFR·CFBD·All sources & credits·Methodology
Career-value model, live
Privacy·Terms·Press ⌘K to search·Draftanomics2026
  1. Draftanomics/
  2. Prospects/
  3. 2022 board/
  4. Compare

Side-by-side comparison

Backtest

3 prospects · 2022 draft

Each spoke: percentile within the prospect's own position (RB)
SC
Snoop Conner
RB · Mississippi
21.7 yo · 5'10" · 222 lb
JC
James Cook
RB · Georgia
22.6 yo · 5'11" · 199 lb
KI
Keaontay Ingram
RB · USC
22.5 yo · 6'0" · 221 lb

Headline metrics

The four numbers a GM checks first.

Snoop Conner
Predicted pick
#248
range #233–#263
Bust probability
49%
0%0/5 comps
Consensus rank
—
no boards yet
Career arc
Bust
tier · Day 3
2nd-deal AAV
$3Mmodel
James Cook
Predicted pick
#157
range #111–#203
Bust probability
34%
0%0/4 comps
Consensus rank
#159
on 24 boards
Career arc
Contributor
tier · Day 3
2nd-deal AAV
$13Mmodel
Keaontay Ingram
Predicted pick
#175
range #142–#208
Bust probability
22%
0%0/4 comps
Consensus rank
—
no boards yet
Career arc
Contributor
tier · Day 3
2nd-deal AAV
$2Mmodel

Feature radar

Each axis is the prospect's percentile among prospects at his position (0–100). Bigger shape = stronger across the board.

ProductionAthleticismAgeConsensusPer-play impact (PPA)Breakout ageWorkloadRAS × production
Prospects
  • Snoop Conner· RB / WR / TE
  • James Cook· RB / WR / TE
  • Keaontay Ingram· RB / WR / TE
Axis leaders
  • ProductionSnoop Conner0
  • AthleticismKeaontay Ingram58
  • AgeSnoop Conner77
  • ConsensusKeaontay Ingram14
  • Per-play impact (PPA)Snoop Conner50
  • Breakout ageSnoop Conner50
  • WorkloadSnoop Conner100
  • RAS × productionKeaontay Ingram100

Comp overlap

Top five historical comps per prospect. Shared comps highlighted.

No shared comps in the top five. Each prospect has a distinct historical profile.
Snoop Conner
  • Benny Snell Jr.
    RB · #122
    Contributor
  • Qadree Ollison
    RB · #152
    Bust
  • DeeJay Dallas
    RB · #144
    Bust
  • Ryquell Armstead
    RB · #140
    Bust
  • D'Onta Foreman
    RB · #89
    Bust
James Cook
  • Mike Weber
    RB · #218
    TBD
  • Damien Harris
    RB · #87
    Contributor
  • Dexter Williams
    RB · #194
    Bust
  • Bo Scarbrough
    RB · #236
    Bust
  • Royce Freeman
    RB · #71
    Contributor
Keaontay Ingram
  • Ty Johnson
    RB · #186
    Contributor
  • Travis Homer
    RB · #204
    Bust
  • Kalen Ballage
    RB · #131
    Contributor
  • Khalfani Muhammad
    RB · #241
    TBD
  • Nyheim Hines
    RB · #104
    Contributor

Risk and opportunity flags

Top three concerns and top two upside signals from the model.

Snoop Conner
Risks
  • Average-to-below athletic profile
    RAS 4.05 (40th percentile at RB). Athleticism is average at best for the position.
  • Comp group bust rate
    4 of 4 closest comps with NFL outcomes washed out: Qadree Ollison, DeeJay Dallas, Ryquell Armstead (+1 more). The neighborhood in feature space is dangerous.
  • Negative per-play impact
    PPA avg_all 0.255 — per-snap contribution is below-average for the position. Volume stats overstate the impact.
Opportunities
No standout upside flags.
James Cook
Risks
  • Comp group bust rate
    2 of 2 closest comps with NFL outcomes washed out: Dexter Williams, Bo Scarbrough. The neighborhood in feature space is dangerous.
  • Negative per-play impact
    PPA avg_all 0.334 — per-snap contribution is below-average for the position. Volume stats overstate the impact.
Opportunities
  • Consensus says higher
    25 boards have him at mean rank #97; model has him #157 — a 60-spot fade. Analysts converging this much above the model is a tell that the model is undervaluing him.
  • Breakout production arc
    Career trajectory in rushing yards: 188 → 303 → 728. Production rose every season — the kind of upward arc that often continues into the league.
Keaontay Ingram
Risks
  • Consensus skeptic
    1 board place him at mean rank #242; model has him #175 — a 67-spot gap. When boards fade a player this hard, the model is usually the one missing something.
  • Negative per-play impact
    PPA avg_all 0.235 — per-snap contribution is below-average for the position. Volume stats overstate the impact.
Opportunities
No standout upside flags.

Career trajectory forecast

Projected share of his team's snaps across the first four NFL seasons. Solid = seasons already played, dashed = the forecast.

0%25%50%75%100%Y1Y2Y3Y4Snap share
Snoop ConnerJames CookKeaontay Ingram· solid = actuals, dashed = forecast

Verdict

The model's plain-English read.

Snoop Conner

Draftanomics projects Snoop Conner (age 21.7 at draft) as a Day 3 dart throw at #248 (range #233-#263, wide band). Bust probability sits at 49% — elevated. The comp set is dangerous: 4 of 4 closest comps with known NFL outcomes washed out as backups or busts. Closest comps: Benny Snell Jr. (Contributor), Qadree Ollison (Bust), DeeJay Dallas (Bust). Ceiling is Benny Snell Jr. (Contributor); floor is Qadree Ollison (Bust). 4 of 4 closest comps with NFL outcomes washed out: Qadree Ollison, DeeJay Dallas, Ryquell Armstead (+1 more). The neighborhood in feature space is dangerous. The call is a lean fade: the model sits 20 spots below the room's consensus #228 — don't pay sticker price. The discount is earned — average-to-below athletic profile leads the case against.

James Cook

Draftanomics projects James Cook (age 22.6 at draft) as a mid-round flyer at #157 (range #111-#203, very wide band — too little on him yet to project tightly). Bust probability sits at 34% — real but not disqualifying. The comp set is dangerous: 2 of 2 closest comps with known NFL outcomes washed out as backups or busts. Closest comps: Mike Weber, Damien Harris (Contributor), Dexter Williams (Bust). Ceiling is Royce Freeman (Contributor); floor is Mike Weber. Career trajectory in rushing yards: 188 → 303 → 728. Production rose every season — the kind of upward arc that often continues into the league. 2 of 2 closest comps with NFL outcomes washed out: Dexter Williams, Bo Scarbrough. The neighborhood in feature space is dangerous. The call is a genuine fade: the room's consensus prices him around #97 and the model won't take him before #157 — a 60-spot markdown. The discount is earned — comp group bust rate leads the case against.

Keaontay Ingram

Draftanomics projects Keaontay Ingram (age 22.5 at draft) as a mid-round flyer at #175 (range #142-#208, very wide band — too little on him yet to project tightly). Bust probability sits at 22% — manageable. The comp set leans young — most of his closest comps haven't played enough NFL snaps yet to be confidently graded. Closest comps: Ty Johnson (Contributor), Travis Homer (Bust), Kalen Ballage (Contributor). Ceiling is Nyheim Hines (Contributor); floor is Khalfani Muhammad. PPA avg_all 0.235 — per-snap contribution is below-average for the position. Volume stats overstate the impact. The call is a conviction buy: the model has him 67 spots ahead of the room (board #175 vs consensus #242), and at a 22% bust probability the edge is worth paying for.