Draftanomics
  • 2027 board
  • Consensus board
  • 2028 way-too-early
  • Draft news
  • Simulator
  • The house mock
  • Draft order
  • Trade calculator
  • The Scouting Slate
  • Sleepers & reaches
  • Movers & fallers
  • Player comps
  • Dynasty rookie board
  • Track record
  • Past drafts, re-graded
  • Analyst leaderboard
My rankingsAccount
Get the weekly →
Draftanomics

Honest NFL Draft analytics. The model's receipts against actual NFL teams live on the track record.

Boards
  • 2027 board
  • Consensus board
  • Sleepers
Tools
  • Mock draft simulator
  • Plays Like
  • Dynasty rookie board
Track Record
  • Year-by-year results
  • Accountability Index
  • Our board, on the record
  • Past drafts, re-graded
  • Methodology
  • Developers · free API
  • About
Account
  • My board
  • Weekly email
Data + sources
RAS by Kent Lee Platte·Consensus Big Board (Arif Hasan)·nflverse·PFR·CFBD·All sources & credits·Methodology
Career-value model, live
Privacy·Terms·Press ⌘K to search·Draftanomics2026
  1. Draftanomics/
  2. Prospects/
  3. 2022 board/
  4. Compare

Side-by-side comparison

Backtest

2 prospects · 2022 draft

Each spoke: percentile within the prospect's own position (TE)
JM
James Mitchell
TE · Virginia Tech
22.7 yo · 6'4" · 249 lb
CO
Cade Otton
TE · Washington
23.0 yo · 6'5" · 247 lb
Tiebreaker
High confidence
Take Cade Otton over James Mitchell.

Decisive factor: 155-pick gap on Draftanomics projection. Reinforced by a bust risk 12 points lower and $6M/yr more in projected second-deal AAV.

Headline metrics

The four numbers a GM checks first.

James Mitchell
Predicted pick
#233
range #194–#272
Bust probability
12%
0%0/5 comps
Consensus rank
—
no boards yet
Career arc
Contributor
tier · Day 3
2nd-deal AAV
$4Mmodel
Cade Otton
Predicted pick
#78
range #63–#93
Bust probability
0%
0%0/5 comps
Consensus rank
#128
on 14 boards
Career arc
Bust
tier · Day 2
2nd-deal AAV
$11Mmodel

Feature radar

Each axis is the prospect's percentile among prospects at his position (0–100). Bigger shape = stronger across the board.

ProductionAthleticismAgeConsensusPer-play impact (PPA)Breakout ageWorkloadRAS × production
Prospects
  • James Mitchell· RB / WR / TE
  • Cade Otton· RB / WR / TE
Axis leaders
  • ProductionJames Mitchell0
  • AthleticismCade Otton39
  • AgeJames Mitchell60
  • ConsensusCade Otton15
  • Per-play impact (PPA)James Mitchell50
  • Breakout ageJames Mitchell50
  • WorkloadJames Mitchell100
  • RAS × productionJames Mitchell0

Comp overlap

Top five historical comps per prospect. Shared comps highlighted.

No shared comps in the top five. Each prospect has a distinct historical profile.
James Mitchell
  • Ryan Izzo
    TE · #250
    Contributor
  • Zach Gentry
    TE · #141
    Contributor
  • Devin Asiasi
    TE · #91
    Backup
  • Dawson Knox
    TE · #96
    Starter
  • Kaden Smith
    TE · #176
    Contributor
Cade Otton
  • Kahale Warring
    TE · #86
    Bust
  • Trevon Wesco
    TE · #121
    Contributor
  • Colby Parkinson
    TE · #133
    Contributor
  • Dalton Schultz
    TE · #137
    Franchise
  • Jeremy Sprinkle
    TE · #154
    Bust

Risk and opportunity flags

Top three concerns and top two upside signals from the model.

James Mitchell
Risks
  • Athletic profile below NFL threshold
    RAS 2.88 (28th percentile vs TE prospects in a 276-yr Combine population). Below the 30th-percentile bar that most NFL starters clear.
  • Comp group has bust risk
    1 of 2 closest comps with NFL outcomes ended up backups or busts: Devin Asiasi. Mixed signal from history.
  • Below-cohort college production
    Position-cohort z-score on production composite is -1.34 — well below the skill average. Raw box-score output didn't keep pace with peers.
Opportunities
  • Consensus says higher
    1 board have him at mean rank #197; model has him #233 — a 36-spot fade. Analysts converging this much above the model is a tell that the model is undervaluing him.
Cade Otton
Risks
  • Older prospect
    Age 23.0 at draft. Slightly older than the cohort median (~22.5); upside ceiling is trimmed.
  • Average-to-below athletic profile
    RAS 3.95 (39th percentile at TE). Athleticism is average at best for the position.
  • Comp group bust rate
    2 of 3 closest comps with NFL outcomes washed out: Kahale Warring, Jeremy Sprinkle. The neighborhood in feature space is dangerous.
Opportunities
No standout upside flags.

Career trajectory forecast

Projected share of his team's snaps across the first four NFL seasons. Solid = seasons already played, dashed = the forecast.

0%25%50%75%100%Y1Y2Y3Y4Snap share
James MitchellCade Otton· solid = actuals, dashed = forecast

Verdict

The model's plain-English read.

James Mitchell

Draftanomics projects James Mitchell (age 22.7 at draft) as a Day 3 dart throw at #233 (range #194-#272, very wide band — too little on him yet to project tightly). Bust probability sits at 12% — low. The comp set is mixed: 1 starters-or-better vs 1 backups-or-busts among the 2 comps with known outcomes. Closest comps: Ryan Izzo (Contributor), Zach Gentry (Contributor), Devin Asiasi (Backup). Ceiling is Dawson Knox (Starter); floor is Devin Asiasi (Backup). RAS 2.88 (28th percentile vs TE prospects in a 276-yr Combine population). Below the 30th-percentile bar that most NFL starters clear. The call is a genuine fade: the room's consensus prices him around #197 and the model won't take him before #233 — a 36-spot markdown. The discount is earned — athletic profile below nfl threshold leads the case against.

Cade Otton

Draftanomics projects Cade Otton (age 23.0 at draft) as a third-round / early Day 3 pick at #78 (range #63-#93, wide band). Bust probability sits at 0% — low. The comp set is dangerous: 2 of 3 closest comps with known NFL outcomes washed out as backups or busts. Closest comps: Kahale Warring (Bust), Trevon Wesco (Contributor), Colby Parkinson (Contributor). Ceiling is Dalton Schultz (Franchise); floor is Colby Parkinson (Contributor). 2 of 3 closest comps with NFL outcomes washed out: Kahale Warring, Jeremy Sprinkle. The neighborhood in feature space is dangerous. The call is a value lean: #78 against a consensus #91 is a 13-spot edge — enough to move him up the queue, not enough to reach a round early, with older prospect the tax on that edge.