Draftanomics
  • 2027 board
  • Consensus board
  • 2028 way-too-early
  • Draft news
  • Simulator
  • The house mock
  • Draft order
  • Trade calculator
  • The Scouting Slate
  • Sleepers & reaches
  • Movers & fallers
  • Player comps
  • Dynasty rookie board
  • Track record
  • Past drafts, re-graded
  • Analyst leaderboard
My rankingsAccount
Get the weekly →
Draftanomics

Honest NFL Draft analytics. The model's receipts against actual NFL teams live on the track record.

Boards
  • 2027 board
  • Consensus board
  • Sleepers
Tools
  • Mock draft simulator
  • Plays Like
  • Dynasty rookie board
Track Record
  • Year-by-year results
  • Accountability Index
  • Our board, on the record
  • Past drafts, re-graded
  • Methodology
  • Developers · free API
  • About
Account
  • My board
  • Weekly email
Data + sources
RAS by Kent Lee Platte·Consensus Big Board (Arif Hasan)·nflverse·PFR·CFBD·All sources & credits·Methodology
Career-value model, live
Privacy·Terms·Press ⌘K to search·Draftanomics2026
  1. Draftanomics/
  2. Prospects/
  3. 2022 board/
  4. Compare

Side-by-side comparison

Backtest

3 prospects · 2022 draft

Each spoke: percentile within the prospect's own position (RB)
BB
Brittain Brown
RB · UCLA
24.6 yo · — · —
PS
Pierre Strong
RB · South Dakota St.
23.4 yo · 5'11" · 207 lb
TC
Ty Chandler
RB · North Carolina
24.0 yo · — · —

Headline metrics

The four numbers a GM checks first.

Brittain Brown
Predicted pick
#243
range #219–#267
Bust probability
4%
0%0/4 comps
Consensus rank
—
no boards yet
Career arc
Bust
tier · Day 3
2nd-deal AAV
$2Mmodel
Pierre Strong
Predicted pick
#117
range #87–#147
Bust probability
63%
0%0/4 comps
Consensus rank
#121
on 2 boards
Career arc
Bust
tier · Day 3
2nd-deal AAV
$4Mmodel
Ty Chandler
Predicted pick
#255
range #231–#279
Bust probability
27%
0%0/4 comps
Consensus rank
—
no boards yet
Career arc
Bust
tier · Day 3
2nd-deal AAV
$3Mmodel

Feature radar

Each axis is the prospect's percentile among prospects at his position (0–100). Bigger shape = stronger across the board.

ProductionAthleticismAgeConsensusPer-play impact (PPA)Breakout ageWorkloadRAS × production
Prospects
  • Brittain Brown· RB / WR / TE
  • Pierre Strong· RB / WR / TE
  • Ty Chandler· RB / WR / TE
Axis leaders
  • ProductionBrittain Brown0
  • AthleticismPierre Strong100
  • AgeTy Chandler12
  • ConsensusPierre Strong31
  • Per-play impact (PPA)Brittain Brown50
  • Breakout ageBrittain Brown50
  • WorkloadBrittain Brown100
  • RAS × productionTy Chandler91

Comp overlap

Top five historical comps per prospect. Shared comps highlighted.

Shared comps
  • Joe WilliamsRB · TBD→ shared byBrittain BrownPierre StrongTy Chandler
  • Trenton CannonRB · Bust→ shared byBrittain BrownPierre StrongTy Chandler
  • Jordan WilkinsRB · Backup→ shared byBrittain BrownTy Chandler
  • David WilliamsRB · Bust→ shared byBrittain BrownTy Chandler
Brittain Brown
  • De'Angelo Henderson
    RB · #203
    Bust
  • Jordan Wilkinsshared
    RB · #169
    Backup
  • David Williamsshared
    RB · #226
    Bust
  • Joe Williamsshared
    RB · #121
    TBD
  • Trenton Cannonshared
    RB · #204
    Bust
Pierre Strong
  • Joe Williamsshared
    RB · #121
    TBD
  • Justin Jackson
    RB · #251
    Backup
  • Boston Scott
    RB · #201
    Contributor
  • Devante Mays
    RB · #238
    Bust
  • Trenton Cannonshared
    RB · #204
    Bust
Ty Chandler
  • Jordan Wilkinsshared
    RB · #169
    Backup
  • David Williamsshared
    RB · #226
    Bust
  • Jordan Scarlett
    RB · #154
    Bust
  • Joe Williamsshared
    RB · #121
    TBD
  • Trenton Cannonshared
    RB · #204
    Bust

Risk and opportunity flags

Top three concerns and top two upside signals from the model.

Brittain Brown
Risks
  • Older prospect
    Age 24.6 at draft. Players entering the league past 24 hit fewer career milestones — the developmental window is already compressed before they take an NFL snap.
  • No athletic testing
    No Combine drills or Pro Day numbers on file while most of the class has tested — the athletic part of the grade is unmeasured.
  • Comp group bust rate
    4 of 4 closest comps with NFL outcomes washed out: De'Angelo Henderson, Jordan Wilkins, David Williams (+1 more). The neighborhood in feature space is dangerous.
Opportunities
  • Breakout production arc
    Career trajectory in rushing yards: 56 → 543 → 616. Production rose every season — the kind of upward arc that often continues into the league.
Pierre Strong
Risks
  • Older prospect
    Age 23.4 at draft. Slightly older than the cohort median (~22.5); upside ceiling is trimmed.
  • Comp group bust rate
    3 of 3 closest comps with NFL outcomes washed out: Justin Jackson, Devante Mays, Trenton Cannon. The neighborhood in feature space is dangerous.
  • Negative per-play impact
    PPA avg_all 0.323 — per-snap contribution is below-average for the position. Volume stats overstate the impact.
Opportunities
No standout upside flags.
Ty Chandler
Risks
  • Older prospect
    Age 24.0 at draft. Slightly older than the cohort median (~22.5); upside ceiling is trimmed.
  • Comp group bust rate
    4 of 4 closest comps with NFL outcomes washed out: Jordan Wilkins, David Williams, Jordan Scarlett (+1 more). The neighborhood in feature space is dangerous.
  • Negative per-play impact
    PPA avg_all 0.327 — per-snap contribution is below-average for the position. Volume stats overstate the impact.
Opportunities
  • Consensus says higher
    1 board have him at mean rank #132; model has him #255 — a 123-spot fade. Analysts converging this much above the model is a tell that the model is undervaluing him.

Career trajectory forecast

Projected share of his team's snaps across the first four NFL seasons. Solid = seasons already played, dashed = the forecast.

0%25%50%75%100%Y1Y2Y3Y4Snap share
Brittain BrownPierre StrongTy Chandler· solid = actuals, dashed = forecast

Verdict

The model's plain-English read.

Brittain Brown

Draftanomics projects Brittain Brown (age 24.6 at draft) as a Day 3 dart throw at #243 (range #219-#267, wide band). Bust probability sits at 4% — low. The comp set is dangerous: 4 of 4 closest comps with known NFL outcomes washed out as backups or busts. Closest comps: De'Angelo Henderson (Bust), Jordan Wilkins (Backup), David Williams (Bust). Ceiling is Joe Williams; floor is Jordan Wilkins (Backup). Career trajectory in rushing yards: 56 → 543 → 616. Production rose every season — the kind of upward arc that often continues into the league. Age 24.6 at draft. Players entering the league past 24 hit fewer career milestones — the developmental window is already compressed before they take an NFL snap. The call is a hold: no public board ranks him, so the model's #243 stands alone — and with bust risk at 4%, let the room catch up before paying a premium.

Pierre Strong

Draftanomics projects Pierre Strong (age 23.4 at draft) as a mid-round flyer at #117 (range #87-#147, very wide band — too little on him yet to project tightly). Bust probability sits at 63% — scary. The comp set is dangerous: 3 of 3 closest comps with known NFL outcomes washed out as backups or busts. Closest comps: Joe Williams, Justin Jackson (Backup), Boston Scott (Contributor). Ceiling is Joe Williams; floor is Justin Jackson (Backup). 3 of 3 closest comps with NFL outcomes washed out: Justin Jackson, Devante Mays, Trenton Cannon. The neighborhood in feature space is dangerous. The call is a lean fade: the model sits 12 spots below the room's consensus #105 — don't pay sticker price. The discount is earned — older prospect leads the case against.

Ty Chandler

Draftanomics projects Ty Chandler (age 24.0 at draft) as a Day 3 dart throw at #255 (range #231-#279, wide band). Bust probability sits at 27% — manageable. The comp set is dangerous: 4 of 4 closest comps with known NFL outcomes washed out as backups or busts. Closest comps: Jordan Wilkins (Backup), David Williams (Bust), Jordan Scarlett (Bust). Ceiling is Joe Williams; floor is Jordan Wilkins (Backup). 4 of 4 closest comps with NFL outcomes washed out: Jordan Wilkins, David Williams, Jordan Scarlett (+1 more). The neighborhood in feature space is dangerous. The call is a genuine fade: the room's consensus prices him around #132 and the model won't take him before #255 — a 123-spot markdown. The discount is earned — older prospect leads the case against.