Draftanomics
  • 2027 board
  • Consensus board
  • 2028 way-too-early
  • Draft news
  • Simulator
  • The house mock
  • Draft order
  • Trade calculator
  • The Scouting Slate
  • Sleepers & reaches
  • Movers & fallers
  • Player comps
  • Dynasty rookie board
  • Track record
  • Past drafts, re-graded
  • Analyst leaderboard
My rankingsAccount
Get the weekly →
Draftanomics

Honest NFL Draft analytics. The model's receipts against actual NFL teams live on the track record.

Boards
  • 2027 board
  • Consensus board
  • Sleepers
Tools
  • Mock draft simulator
  • Plays Like
  • Dynasty rookie board
Track Record
  • Year-by-year results
  • Accountability Index
  • Our board, on the record
  • Past drafts, re-graded
  • Methodology
  • Developers · free API
  • About
Account
  • My board
  • Weekly email
Data + sources
RAS by Kent Lee Platte·Consensus Big Board (Arif Hasan)·nflverse·PFR·CFBD·All sources & credits·Methodology
Career-value model, live
Privacy·Terms·Press ⌘K to search·Draftanomics2026
  1. Draftanomics/
  2. 2018 board/
  3. Shaquille Leonard
Refreshed just now
Shaquille Leonard
2018 NFL Draft prospect

Shaquille Leonard

LB·South Carolina St.
age 22.8
67rank#67$1.6M
→ IND's 2018 class
Print sheet
Backtest: model vs. reality

The model graded Shaquille Leonard at pick #67; he was actually picked #36 by IND. 6 NFL seasons in, he's carved out a genuine role (grading 10.6 of 20 per season), and the market has paid him — a second deal at $19.7M a year. The 4-tier model sees a strong shot at elite: 80% probability of Pro-Bowl-level career. NFL grades have been modest so far (2% recent-3, 47% peak across 6 seasons). The AAV predictor called it: model said $22M/yr, actual was $20M.

Shaquille LeonardLBDraftanomics #67
Print
Dossier
OverviewScouting reportWhy this gradeConsensusProduction6RiskTeam fitWill he be there?CompsFilm & notes

Overview

Headline grade, verdict, and the one-line scout take

Draftanomics Rank
Speculative
#67LB·South Carolina St.

The league moved faster than our board — IND took him at No. 36, 31 picks ahead of our No. 67 grade. His career is settling that argument now.

Draftanomics's take

Draftanomics had Shaquille Leonard at #67 on draft night — a Day 2 grade — and IND took him at No. 36, 31 picks earlier than our grade. The model's case leans on his recruiting pedigree. Bust risk projects at 20%, below the position median — the model has a tight grade. The room had him #131 pre-draft; our board was 64 spots higher.

Written from the live model's numbers — projected to round 3, and it updates whenever the model does. See methodology for what drives the take.

Scouting report

The written report — drafted from the fact sheet, every number traceable, honest about what we can't see yet

Why this grade

Which signals drove the grade up or down — in plain English

Consensus

The analyst room, accuracy-weighted, plus where Draftanomics disagrees with it

Production6

Measurables, traits, and college play quality

Risk

Bust probability, injury history, character flags, pre-mortem

Team fit

How well this prospect fits each of the 32 team schemes

Will he be there?

Probability he's still on the board at each of your picks

Comps

Historical players this prospect resembles

Film & notes

Clips, scout notes, voice memos, written reports

Draftanomics Pick?
#67
Day 2range #11–#188 · volatile
Bust Probability?
20%
1.00× EDGE / DL / LB class avg (20%)
≈ class avg
Actual NFL Pick?
#36
IND · Rd 2
Career Outcome · 6 seasons?
63.8
10.6 / season avg
Career outlook

Career outlook

How this is built →
5-year career arc
Elite
80%
Bust
1%
Starter
10%
Role
9%

Read the two ends and skim the middle: the model has a real track record telling stars and busts apart, but “solid starter vs. rotation guy” is close to a coin flip from public data — that's why those two bars are grayed. For his odds of outright busting, the Bust-risk panel next door is the number to trust.

Second contract · signed
$19.7M/yr
5 years, $99M total.
We projected $21.8M/yr on draft night — close to the money.
Bust risk
20%
Public-board consensus

15 public boards track this prospect. Per-board breakdown loads with the live board.

Pin a team in your account to see how this prospect fits your roster + cap.
Scout note
Private to this device — saved to your browser, never sent to a server.
Empty notes are auto-deleted.
Verdict
Model lower than NFL
Gap (actual − predicted)
-31

Film

Highlight reels indexed from YouTube. Loads only when you press play.

Working in his favor: number of boards ranking him, hS recruit rating, and lowest board ranking. Nothing in the profile pulled the grade down.

HS recruit rating
+0.03
Conference strength
-0.01
Scout consensus
-0.01

Model read

Model grade
0.59 of 1
Confidence?
29%
Predicted round
3

The grade is the 0-to-1 score the board sorts by — it only means something next to the rest of this class, which is why the rank above it is the number to quote.

Pulling the boards…
Mock-draft consensus
Pulling the mocks…
NFL play quality?
2
/ peak 47
Below-average play
Across 6 NFL seasons.
4-tier outlook?
Elite
Model sees a real shot at Pro-Bowl-level career
Model trust: MODERATE
Elite
80%
Starter
10%
Role
9%
Bust
1%

Outcome shares from the 4-tier model. The Bust share here is a different model than the headline bust probability — for bust risk, use that number.

Model market value
$21.8M
($12.5M – $31.1M)
top-third at position
Actual: $19.7M(+$2.1M)
Model-predicted second-deal AAV ($M/yr).
Risk dashboard

Risk profile is clean

Risk score17· CLEAN

Everything that could go wrong with Shaquille Leonard, gathered in one place — the most serious flags listed first.

  • Predicted-pick range#11–188 · 177-pick spread
    The model's own projections scatter widely for this prospect — the landing spot is genuinely uncertain.
  • Bust probability20%
    Modest bust risk — normal territory for the position.
  • Age22.8 yrs
    Within the typical LB draft-age band (~23.5).
  • Public-board coverage15 sources
    Plenty of public boards have a read — the grade is well corroborated.
Scheme context
Loading…
Scout reports
Paste in any scouting report you trust; Draftanomics pulls out the concrete claims so you can weigh them against the model on the same page.
Loading…

    Who picks where he’s projected

    Roster-based need returns once the 2017 season is played — grading this year’s teams on last year’s depth chart would be guessing. What’s knowable now: the teams holding picks around No. 67, and which of them already spent premium capital at EDGE / DL / LB in the 2017 draft.

    JAX · No. 61MIN · No. 62TB · No. 63IND · No. 64LV · No. 65NYG · No. 66CLE · No. 67HOU · No. 68just drafted one

    Gold means no recent premium investment at EDGE / DL / LB — the cleaner fit on paper. Grey means they already spent one.