Refreshed just now
Backtest: model vs. reality
The model graded Chazz Surratt at pick #72; he was actually picked #78 by MIN. 5 NFL seasons in, he's barely gotten on the field (grading 0.1 of 20 per season), and the market has paid him — a second deal at $0.2M a year. The 4-tier model has him as a likely role.
Overview
Headline grade, verdict, and the one-line scout take
Draftanomics's take
Draftanomics had Chazz Surratt at #72 on draft night — a Day 2 grade — and MIN took him at No. 78. The model's case leans on broad top-100 board coverage and his age curve. Bust risk projects at 20%, below the position median — the model has a tight grade. The room had him #115 pre-draft; our board was 43 spots higher.
Written from the live model's numbers — projected to round 3, and it updates whenever the model does. See methodology for what drives the take.
Scouting report
The written report — drafted from the fact sheet, every number traceable, honest about what we can't see yet
Why this grade
Which signals drove the grade up or down — in plain English
Consensus
The analyst room, accuracy-weighted, plus where Draftanomics disagrees with it
Production
Measurables, traits, and college play quality
Risk
Bust probability, injury history, character flags, pre-mortem
Team fit
How well this prospect fits each of the 32 team schemes
Will he be there?
Probability he's still on the board at each of your picks
Comps
Historical players this prospect resembles
Film & notes
Clips, scout notes, voice memos, written reports