Refreshed just now
Limited public-board coverage (0 boards) — grade leans on stats + athleticism alone
Backtest: model vs. reality
The model graded Will Reichard at pick #149; he was actually picked #203 by MIN. 2 NFL seasons in, he's barely gotten on the field (grading -1.6 of 20 per season). So far, the league's caution is winning the argument. The 4-tier model has him as a likely role. NFL grades have been modest so far (3% recent-3, 9% peak across 1 seasons).
Overview
Headline grade, verdict, and the one-line scout take
Draftanomics Rank
Low conviction#149K·Alabama
We had him No. 149 on draft night; MIN didn't call his name until No. 203 — a 54-pick gap between our board and the league's. His career is settling that argument now.
Scouting report
The written report — drafted from the fact sheet, every number traceable, honest about what we can't see yet
Why this grade
Which signals drove the grade up or down — in plain English
Consensus
The analyst room, accuracy-weighted, plus where Draftanomics disagrees with it
Production1
Measurables, traits, and college play quality
Risk
Bust probability, injury history, character flags, pre-mortem
Team fit
How well this prospect fits each of the 32 team schemes
Will he be there?
Probability he's still on the board at each of your picks
Comps
Historical players this prospect resembles
Film & notes
Clips, scout notes, voice memos, written reports