Refreshed just now
rank#82$1.4M
Limited public-board coverage (1 board) — grade leans on stats + athleticism alone
Backtest: model vs. reality
The model graded JC Latham at pick #82; he was actually picked #7 by TEN. 2 NFL seasons in, he's carved out a genuine role (grading 7.4 of 20 per season). The 4-tier model has him as a likely role. NFL grades have been modest so far (2% recent-3, 6% peak across 1 seasons). Model expects a second-deal AAV around $8M/yr.
Overview
Headline grade, verdict, and the one-line scout take
Draftanomics Rank
Medium conviction#82OL·Alabama
The league moved faster than our board — TEN took him at No. 7, 75 picks ahead of our No. 82 grade. His career is settling that argument now.
Draftanomics's take
Draftanomics had JC Latham at #82 on draft night — a Day 2 grade — and TEN took him at No. 7, 75 picks earlier than our grade. Bust risk projects at 3%, below the position median — the model has a tight grade. The room had him #20 pre-draft; our board sat 62 spots lower.
Written from the live model's numbers — and it updates whenever the model does. See for what drives the take.
Scouting report
The written report — drafted from the fact sheet, every number traceable, honest about what we can't see yet
Why this grade
Which signals drove the grade up or down — in plain English
Consensus
The analyst room, accuracy-weighted, plus where Draftanomics disagrees with it
Production1
Measurables, traits, and college play quality
Risk
Bust probability, injury history, character flags, pre-mortem
Team fit
How well this prospect fits each of the 32 team schemes
Will he be there?
Probability he's still on the board at each of your picks
Comps
Historical players this prospect resembles
Film & notes
Clips, scout notes, voice memos, written reports