Adonijah Green's sack total climbed from one to four and his tackles for loss doubled from three to six between his first two seasons at Louisville, real signs of ascending production for a 6-foot-5, 206-pound EDGE.
Headline grade, verdict, and the one-line scout take
Adonijah Greenis off the model's board — nothing to rank yet. No public board carries him and the model has no production, testing, or age data to anchor a real number. The take fills in as boards and testing land.
No tier prediction yet for this prospect.
5 public boards track this prospect. Per-board breakdown loads with the live board.
The written report — drafted from the fact sheet, every number traceable, honest about what we can't see yet
Which signals drove the grade up or down — in plain English
The analyst room, accuracy-weighted, plus where Draftanomics disagrees with it
Measurables, traits, and college play quality
Historical players this prospect resembles
Bust probability, injury history, character flags, pre-mortem
How well this prospect fits each of the 32 team schemes
Probability he's still on the board at each of your picks
Clips, scout notes, voice memos, written reports
Highlight reels indexed from YouTube. Loads only when you press play.
Working in his favor: age. Working against him: production trajectory and how many boards rank him top-100.
The grade is the 0-to-1 score the board sorts by — it only means something next to the rest of this class, which is why the rank above it is the number to quote.
No sourced scouting observations indexed yet — this read is model-only.
Green sits off Draftanomics's ranked board altogether — the model has no grade to hang a number on, only a bust read of 35.1%, in a band running from 22.8% to 47.5%, pulled from a low-signal sample. The single board that has him ranked puts him at No. 166 for 2027, which at least confirms someone else likes the sack jump too. Hold here: the trend is real, but there's no grade and barely a board to buy into yet.
Written by Draftanomics's models from the statistical record — no scouting sources cover this player yet, so no film claims appear. Every number is machine-checked against the live data before publication. How these reports are written →
| Source | Rank | Weight | As of | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bucs Wire Andrew Harbaugh | #90 | 0.50 | 2026-08-11 | source ↗ |
| Last Word On Sports Drew Crabtree | #113 | 0.50 | 2026-08-11 | source ↗ |
| Tankathon staff | #114 | 0.50 | 2026-08-11 | source ↗ |
| PFF · Daire Carragher | #126 | 0.50 | 2026-08-11 | source ↗ |
| Sports Talk Sam Teets | #128 | 0.50 | 2026-08-11 | source ↗ |
August gap: the marquee Tier-A boards haven't published yet — weighting falls back to the full room.
We don't have per-season production for this player — typical for specialists and prospects outside the major charting feeds. Stats land here as soon as a season is on record.
Percentiles are direction-aware — for 40-time / 3-cone / shuttle, lower is faster, so a 95th-percentile mark means faster than 95% of peers. Hover any percentile for the exact peer group and sample size. A missing row means he hasn't posted that measurement.
Everything that could go wrong with Adonijah Green, gathered in one place — the most serious flags listed first.
Failure-mode scan combining bust probability, closest historical comp's arc, age curve, and active flags. Read this before turning in the card.
The 4-tier hybrid model assigns elevated bust risk. Above 30% bust prob is the threshold above which historical false-positive rates spike — confirm the production signal isn't being rescued by an outlier athletic test.
No draft-media headlines link here yet — when an outlet we track writes this player up, it lands in this panel automatically.