Skip to main content
Draftanomics
Prospect dossier

Benjamin Brahmer

TE · Penn State · via Iowa State · 2027 NFL Draft class

Public Draft Board rank #61·4 contributing sources·Board as of August 31, 2026
Draftanomics scouting
Revised preseason edition · August 31, 20264 min readReport role: TE · Penn State

Master scouting report

Brahmer gives a passing game a large target who can find space and make that space useful to the quarterback. His receiving role is easier to establish than a complete inline assignment, because the blocking still needs greater functional strength and consistency. Penn State's familiar staff and crowded tight-end room give him an opportunity to develop that balance without guaranteeing the same weekly workload.

By Draftanomics · Sources & edition · Print report

01Production beyond a single season

Brahmer finished his Iowa State career with 75 catches for 977 yards and nine touchdowns across 33 games and 14 starts. In 2025, he caught 37 passes for 446 yards and six touchdowns in 12 games, including ten starts. That followed 28 receptions as a freshman and ten in an eight-game sophomore season. He arrives with three seasons of receiving production and experience carrying a larger role in the offense. The progression from an immediate freshman contribution to ten starts in his final Iowa State season gives Penn State an experienced receiving option.

02Make the throwing window useful

Brahmer moves into openings in coverage and uses his hands to help free the route. The value is in presenting the quarterback with a target at the right point in the play, rather than making every reception depend on outrunning a defender. His height gives that target more reach, especially where a smaller coverage player has to contest the same throw. Open seams and scoring-area routes can use that reach to present a target above smaller coverage. The route must earn a window he can use.

03Receiving contact and blocking contact

Brahmer can also bring physicality after the catch, keeping a useful completion alive through contact. At the line, however, the contest asks him to control a defensive end through a sustained engagement. Functional strength and inline consistency remain the blocking priorities. Receiving skill and reliable blocking require different work. Broader duties require repeatable control through the block; the receiving frame alone cannot supply it.

04Familiar offense, competition for work

Jamie Lynch's preseason review places Brahmer alongside Andrew Rappleyea and fellow Iowa State transfer Gabe Burkle in Penn State's tight-end group. The move reunites Brahmer with quarterback Rocco Becht and a staff familiar with his Iowa State work. Andy Stine reports Matt Campbell's intention to use multiple tight ends, with two and sometimes three on the field. That context matters because an offense can give different players complementary jobs, keeping a receiving threat involved without asking one tight end to do everything. It is also a competitive setting: familiarity can help a player start from a shared understanding, but it does not award every route or settle the blocking evaluation.

05What would expand the role

The most useful development question is whether Brahmer becomes easier to keep on the field across different calls. A multiple-tight-end offense can create room for a specialist, while also exposing how the group divides the difficult work. More consistent blocking would widen the calls available with Brahmer attached to the formation and reduce the need to select his assignments carefully. His receiving movement and ability to work free are the foundation to preserve while that broader role develops. The most valuable improvement would be an offense trusting him to run a route or hold a block from the same personnel group.

The case for the player

Strengths

  • Movement into open space, release hands and physical receiving play create several ways to help a passing game.

  • Three seasons of receiving production give the assessment a firmer base than size or preseason recognition alone.

The questions that remain

Concerns

  • Inline strength and blocking consistency remain central to earning a complete tight-end assignment.

  • A deep, varied position group creates competition for opportunities; the transfer does not guarantee increased receiving volume.

Building the fit

NFL role and scheme fit

The initial recommendation is a receiving tight end in an offense willing to create space for his routes. Use his dimensions as an advantage in that work while developing the blocking required for broader attached duties. Multiple-tight-end packages offer a sensible way to combine complementary skills, provided the individual assignment remains clear. Pair him with complementary blocking ability while he earns more complete duties of his own.

The Draftanomics view

Bottom line

Brahmer brings an established college receiving contribution into this assessment. His size gives the passing role appeal, but reliable blocking is what would make that role easier to expand. Evaluate the breadth of the work he earns and executes; a fuller tight-end job would be a more meaningful step than a familiar system simply producing another season of catches.

Sources & edition

The Draftanomics assessment, synthesized from attributed reporting. Role and development language expresses scouting opinion.

Preseason synthesis of Iowa State production and published evaluations, with Penn State transfer context through August 2026. No 2026-game evaluation or new Draftanomics film study is included.

Edition reviewed September 12, 2026. Rebuilds the receiving and blocking discussion, connects the Penn State transition to role competition and removes unsupported technique and charting-based conclusions.

The original August edition remains preserved. This is a revised Draftanomics assessment, with supporting sources attached to each statement.

View the 5 referenced sources
Read statement references

Every passage remains linked to its supporting sources. Open a section to inspect the assessment and its evidence.

Sources for overview
  1. House assessment

    Brahmer gives a passing game a large target who can find space and make that space useful to the quarterback.

  2. House assessment

    His receiving role is easier to establish than a complete inline assignment, because the blocking still needs greater functional strength and consistency.

  3. House assessment

    Penn State's familiar staff and crowded tight-end room give him an opportunity to develop that balance without guaranteeing the same weekly workload.

Sources for production beyond a single season
  1. Reported fact

    Brahmer finished his Iowa State career with 75 catches for 977 yards and nine touchdowns across 33 games and 14 starts.

  2. Reported fact

    In 2025, he caught 37 passes for 446 yards and six touchdowns in 12 games, including ten starts.

  3. Reported fact

    That followed 28 receptions as a freshman and ten in an eight-game sophomore season.

  4. House assessment

    He arrives with three seasons of receiving production and experience carrying a larger role in the offense.

  5. House assessment

    The progression from an immediate freshman contribution to ten starts in his final Iowa State season gives Penn State an experienced receiving option.

Sources for make the throwing window useful
  1. House assessment

    Brahmer moves into openings in coverage and uses his hands to help free the route.

  2. House assessment

    The value is in presenting the quarterback with a target at the right point in the play, rather than making every reception depend on outrunning a defender.

  3. House assessment

    His height gives that target more reach, especially where a smaller coverage player has to contest the same throw.

  4. House assessment

    Open seams and scoring-area routes can use that reach to present a target above smaller coverage.

  5. House assessment

    The route must earn a window he can use.

Sources for receiving contact and blocking contact
  1. House assessment

    Brahmer can also bring physicality after the catch, keeping a useful completion alive through contact.

  2. House assessment

    At the line, however, the contest asks him to control a defensive end through a sustained engagement.

  3. House assessment

    Functional strength and inline consistency remain the blocking priorities.

  4. House assessment

    Receiving skill and reliable blocking require different work.

  5. House assessment

    Broader duties require repeatable control through the block; the receiving frame alone cannot supply it.

Sources for familiar offense, competition for work
  1. Reported fact

    Jamie Lynch's preseason review places Brahmer alongside Andrew Rappleyea and fellow Iowa State transfer Gabe Burkle in Penn State's tight-end group.

  2. Reported fact

    The move reunites Brahmer with quarterback Rocco Becht and a staff familiar with his Iowa State work.

  3. Reported fact

    Andy Stine reports Matt Campbell's intention to use multiple tight ends, with two and sometimes three on the field.

  4. House assessment

    That context matters because an offense can give different players complementary jobs, keeping a receiving threat involved without asking one tight end to do everything.

  5. House assessment

    It is also a competitive setting: familiarity can help a player start from a shared understanding, but it does not award every route or settle the blocking evaluation.

Sources for what would expand the role
  1. House assessment

    The most useful development question is whether Brahmer becomes easier to keep on the field across different calls.

  2. House assessment

    A multiple-tight-end offense can create room for a specialist, while also exposing how the group divides the difficult work.

  3. House assessment

    More consistent blocking would widen the calls available with Brahmer attached to the formation and reduce the need to select his assignments carefully.

  4. House assessment

    His receiving movement and ability to work free are the foundation to preserve while that broader role develops.

  5. House assessment

    The most valuable improvement would be an offense trusting him to run a route or hold a block from the same personnel group.

Sources for strength
  1. House assessment

    Movement into open space, release hands and physical receiving play create several ways to help a passing game.

Sources for strength
  1. House assessment

    Three seasons of receiving production give the assessment a firmer base than size or preseason recognition alone.

Sources for concern
  1. House assessment

    Inline strength and blocking consistency remain central to earning a complete tight-end assignment.

Sources for concern
  1. House assessment

    A deep, varied position group creates competition for opportunities; the transfer does not guarantee increased receiving volume.

Sources for nfl role and scheme fit
  1. House assessment

    The initial recommendation is a receiving tight end in an offense willing to create space for his routes.

  2. House assessment

    Use his dimensions as an advantage in that work while developing the blocking required for broader attached duties.

  3. House assessment

    Multiple-tight-end packages offer a sensible way to combine complementary skills, provided the individual assignment remains clear.

  4. House assessment

    Pair him with complementary blocking ability while he earns more complete duties of his own.

Sources for bottom line
  1. House assessment

    Brahmer brings an established college receiving contribution into this assessment.

  2. House assessment

    His size gives the passing role appeal, but reliable blocking is what would make that role easier to expand.

  3. House assessment

    Evaluate the breadth of the work he earns and executes; a fuller tight-end job would be a more meaningful step than a familiar system simply producing another season of catches.

College record & draft context

College production, measurables, experience, and the prospect's place on the sealed Public Draft Board.

Public Draft Board

Public Draft Board rank
#61
Position rank
WR8
Contributing sources
4
Movement since prior snapshot
Up 95

Sealed snapshot as of August 31, 2026 · equal-weight aggregation of public boards, minimum 3 sources for a rank · The Public Draft Board

College production

Receiving
StatisticSeason 2024Season 2025
Receptions1037
Receiving yards179446
Yards per reception17.912.1
Receiving TD16
Long3927
Rushing
StatisticSeason 2024Season 2025
Carries—1
Rushing yards—-2
Yards per carry—-2
Rushing TD—0
Long—0

Seasons of evidence: 2. Games played, snap counts, and usage shares are not in the retained data. An em dash means the value is not in the dataset, not zero.

Evidence notes

  • The retained data contains 2 seasons of receiving, rushing production (2024–2025).
  • Receiving yards increased in each observed season (179 → 446).
  • The newest college season in the retained data is 2025; the 2026 season is not yet included.
  • No verified athletic testing is included in the sealed dataset for this prospect.
  • 4 contributing public boards rank this prospect; the Public Draft Board places him at #61.
  • The aggregate public rank rose 95 spots between the two most recent sealed weekly snapshots.

Each note restates a displayed fact. None is a forecast of NFL performance.

Experience and measurements

Listed height
6'7"
Listed weight
250 lb
Class
Senior
Age
Not in dataset
Recorded school
Penn State
Former school
Iowa State
Hometown
Pierce, NE
Jersey
#18
Recruiting stars
Not in dataset
Recruiting rank
Not in dataset

"Not in dataset" means the value is absent from the sealed dossier dataset, not that it does not exist.

Athletic testing

Not included in the sealed dataset. No combine, pro-day, or RAS value is retained for the 2027 class; absence here does not mean no testing has taken place.

Listed roster height and weight (CollegeFootballData); no verified athletic testing is retained. Bio captured August 29, 2026.

Historical comparisons

Historical profile comparisons are being rebuilt.

Sources and methodology

  • Retained bio and measurements: Draftanomics prospect ingest (CollegeFootballData rosters and recruiting), retained seed data/seed/prospects_upcoming_full.parquet.
  • Retained college production: CollegeFootballData season statistics via the retained player cross-reference; position-relevant categories only; all-zero category rows dropped.
  • Age: unavailable — no birth date or age is retained for the 2027 class.
  • Transfer history: not retained — the page shows the current school and, where the frozen id names a different school, the former school.
  • Public Draft Board: sealed snapshot as of August 31, 2026; per-source ranks are not published under the aggregate-only source policy.

Board methodologyDossier methodologyResearch status

Board position reflects aggregated public opinion; the scouting report is a separate editorial assessment.