Skip to main content
Prospect dossier

Benjamin Brahmer

TE · Penn State · via Iowa State · 2027 NFL Draft class

Public Draft Board rank #61·4 contributing sources·Board as of August 31, 2026
Draftanomics scouting
Revised preseason edition · August 31, 20263 min readReport role: TE · Penn State

Master scouting report

Brahmer projects as a receiving tight end in a complementary NFL role. He finds open coverage space, works free with his hands and presents a large target on seams and scoring-area routes. Limited functional strength and inconsistent inline blocking prevent a complete attached-tight-end projection.

01Experience and production

Brahmer finished three Iowa State seasons with 75 catches for 977 yards and nine touchdowns across 33 games and 14 starts. He caught 37 passes for 446 yards and six touchdowns in 12 games, including ten starts, in 2025. That followed 28 catches as a freshman and ten in an eight-game sophomore season. He brings an established receiving workload to Penn State.

02Routes and receiving fit

Brahmer identifies open space and uses his hands to clear contact on the route. His height gives the quarterback room to place the ball above smaller coverage players. Seams and scoring-area routes suit that reach. He creates value through positioning and a large target more than by consistently running away from the defender.

03Play strength and blocking

Brahmer can finish receptions physically and continue through contact after the catch. That strength has not translated consistently to controlling a defensive end inline. He needs more functional power and sustained engagement to hold the edge of the formation. Receiving through contact is the better-established part of his physical game.

04College role

Brahmer joins Andrew Rappleyea and fellow Iowa State transfer Gabe Burkle at Penn State, reuniting with quarterback Rocco Becht and familiar offensive staff. The planned offense uses two- and occasional three-tight-end groupings. That creates room for a receiving role alongside stronger blocking help, although a deep position group leaves his target share uncertain.

05Role development

Improved inline sustain would let Brahmer run a route or hold a block from the same attached alignment without narrowing the call. At present, his receiving work is more dependable than his ability to control the line. Multiple-tight-end personnel can accommodate that split, but a broader individual role requires repeatable blocking strength.

The case for the player

Strengths

  • Movement into open space, release hands and physical receiving play create several ways to help a passing game.

  • Three seasons of receiving production give the assessment a firmer base than size or preseason recognition alone.

The questions that remain

Concerns

  • Inline strength and blocking consistency remain central to earning a complete tight-end assignment.

  • A deep, varied position group creates competition for opportunities; the transfer does not guarantee increased receiving volume.

Building the fit

NFL role and scheme fit

Use Brahmer as a complementary receiving tight end on seams, zone openings and scoring-area routes. Multiple-tight-end packages can pair his target size with stronger inline blocking. He can earn more attached work as his sustain improves; the present projection should not assume that he can handle a defensive end consistently.

The Draftanomics view

Bottom line

Brahmer offers an established receiving base and a large target for an NFL tight-end rotation. Finding space, clearing contact on routes and finishing physically are the strengths. Inline power and blocking consistency are the limits. He projects most clearly as a receiving complement, with a more complete role dependent on development at the line.

Sources & edition

The Draftanomics assessment, synthesized from attributed reporting. Role and development language expresses scouting opinion.

Preseason synthesis of Iowa State production and published evaluations, with Penn State transfer context through August 2026. No 2026-game evaluation or new Draftanomics film study is included.

Edition reviewed September 12, 2026. Rebuilds the receiving and blocking discussion, connects the Penn State transition to role competition and removes unsupported technique and charting-based conclusions.

The original August edition remains preserved. This is a revised Draftanomics assessment, with supporting sources attached to each statement.

View the 5 referenced sources
Read statement references

Every passage remains linked to its supporting sources. Open a section to inspect the assessment and its evidence.

Sources for overview
  1. House assessment

    Brahmer projects as a receiving tight end in a complementary NFL role. He finds open coverage space, works free with his hands and presents a large target on seams and scoring-area routes. Limited functional strength and inconsistent inline blocking prevent a complete attached-tight-end projection.

Sources for experience and production
  1. House assessment

    Brahmer finished three Iowa State seasons with 75 catches for 977 yards and nine touchdowns across 33 games and 14 starts. He caught 37 passes for 446 yards and six touchdowns in 12 games, including ten starts, in 2025. That followed 28 catches as a freshman and ten in an eight-game sophomore season. He brings an established receiving workload to Penn State.

Sources for routes and receiving fit
  1. House assessment

    Brahmer identifies open space and uses his hands to clear contact on the route. His height gives the quarterback room to place the ball above smaller coverage players. Seams and scoring-area routes suit that reach. He creates value through positioning and a large target more than by consistently running away from the defender.

Sources for play strength and blocking
  1. House assessment

    Brahmer can finish receptions physically and continue through contact after the catch. That strength has not translated consistently to controlling a defensive end inline. He needs more functional power and sustained engagement to hold the edge of the formation. Receiving through contact is the better-established part of his physical game.

Sources for college role
  1. House assessment

    Brahmer joins Andrew Rappleyea and fellow Iowa State transfer Gabe Burkle at Penn State, reuniting with quarterback Rocco Becht and familiar offensive staff. The planned offense uses two- and occasional three-tight-end groupings. That creates room for a receiving role alongside stronger blocking help, although a deep position group leaves his target share uncertain.

Sources for role development
  1. House assessment

    Improved inline sustain would let Brahmer run a route or hold a block from the same attached alignment without narrowing the call. At present, his receiving work is more dependable than his ability to control the line. Multiple-tight-end personnel can accommodate that split, but a broader individual role requires repeatable blocking strength.

Sources for strength
  1. House assessment

    Movement into open space, release hands and physical receiving play create several ways to help a passing game.

Sources for strength
  1. House assessment

    Three seasons of receiving production give the assessment a firmer base than size or preseason recognition alone.

Sources for concern
  1. House assessment

    Inline strength and blocking consistency remain central to earning a complete tight-end assignment.

Sources for concern
  1. House assessment

    A deep, varied position group creates competition for opportunities; the transfer does not guarantee increased receiving volume.

Sources for nfl role and scheme fit
  1. House assessment

    Use Brahmer as a complementary receiving tight end on seams, zone openings and scoring-area routes. Multiple-tight-end packages can pair his target size with stronger inline blocking. He can earn more attached work as his sustain improves; the present projection should not assume that he can handle a defensive end consistently.

Sources for bottom line
  1. House assessment

    Brahmer offers an established receiving base and a large target for an NFL tight-end rotation. Finding space, clearing contact on routes and finishing physically are the strengths. Inline power and blocking consistency are the limits. He projects most clearly as a receiving complement, with a more complete role dependent on development at the line.

College record & draft context

College production, measurables, experience, and the prospect's place on the sealed Public Draft Board.

Public Draft Board

Public Draft Board rank
#61
Position rank
WR8
Contributing sources
4
Movement since prior snapshot
Up 95

Sealed snapshot as of August 31, 2026 · equal-weight aggregation of public boards, minimum 3 sources for a rank · The Public Draft Board

College production

Receiving
StatisticSeason 2024Season 2025
Receptions1037
Receiving yards179446
Yards per reception17.912.1
Receiving TD16
Long3927
Rushing
StatisticSeason 2024Season 2025
Carries—1
Rushing yards—-2
Yards per carry—-2
Rushing TD—0
Long—0

Seasons of evidence: 2. Games played, snap counts, and usage shares are not in the retained data. An em dash means the value is not in the dataset, not zero.

Evidence notes

  • The retained data contains 2 seasons of receiving, rushing production (2024–2025).
  • Receiving yards increased in each observed season (179 → 446).
  • The newest college season in the retained data is 2025; the 2026 season is not yet included.
  • No verified athletic testing is included in the sealed dataset for this prospect.
  • 4 contributing public boards rank this prospect; the Public Draft Board places him at #61.
  • The aggregate public rank rose 95 spots between the two most recent sealed weekly snapshots.

Each note restates a displayed fact. None is a forecast of NFL performance.

Experience and measurements

Listed height
6'7"
Listed weight
250 lb
Class
Senior
Age
Not in dataset
Recorded school
Penn State
Former school
Iowa State
Hometown
Pierce, NE
Jersey
#18
Recruiting stars
Not in dataset
Recruiting rank
Not in dataset

"Not in dataset" means the value is absent from the sealed dossier dataset, not that it does not exist.

Athletic testing

Not included in the sealed dataset. No combine, pro-day, or RAS value is retained for the 2027 class; absence here does not mean no testing has taken place.

Listed roster height and weight (CollegeFootballData); no verified athletic testing is retained. Bio captured August 29, 2026.

Historical comparisons

Historical profile comparisons are being rebuilt.

Sources and methodology

  • Retained bio and measurements: Draftanomics prospect ingest (CollegeFootballData rosters and recruiting), retained seed data/seed/prospects_upcoming_full.parquet.
  • Retained college production: CollegeFootballData season statistics via the retained player cross-reference; position-relevant categories only; all-zero category rows dropped.
  • Age: unavailable — no birth date or age is retained for the 2027 class.
  • Transfer history: not retained — the page shows the current school and, where the frozen id names a different school, the former school.
  • Public Draft Board: sealed snapshot as of August 31, 2026; per-source ranks are not published under the aggregate-only source policy.

Board methodologyDossier methodologyResearch status

Board position reflects aggregated public opinion; the scouting report is a separate editorial assessment.