Skip to main content
Prospect dossier

CJ Carr

QB · Notre Dame · 2027 NFL Draft class

Public Draft Board rank #22·33 contributing sources·Board as of August 31, 2026
Draftanomics scouting
Revised preseason edition · September 12, 20264 min readReport role: QB · Notre Dame

Master scouting report

Carr gives an offense a workable rhythm from the pocket. His feet and delivery can bring the ball to a developing window before the coverage closes it. The key question is how much of that operation survives when the first answer disappears or pressure interrupts the throw.

01One full season to examine

Notre Dame records 12 starts for Carr in 2025 after his redshirt introduction in 2024. He completed 195 passes at 66.7 percent for 2,741 yards and 24 touchdowns. The first full season includes 354 passing yards and four touchdowns against Arkansas, followed later by 342 yards and two touchdowns against NC State.

02Choose the shape of the throw

Ryan Roberts credits Carr with varying arm speed to deliver touch at intermediate and deeper levels. His confidence lets him attempt throws into contested windows instead of waiting for a receiver to become obviously uncovered. That conviction is useful when the placement matches the defender’s position and the route’s timing. Sam Teets makes a helpful distinction between velocity to the far side on shorter throws and the strength needed to drive a very deep ball. He credits the former while describing downfield underthrows. A throw that arrives quickly across the field does not establish the same margin on a much longer trajectory.

03Rhythm begins below the release

SparkScouting describes a compact, repeatable release and footwork connected to the progression. Its intermediate examples include digs, outs and layered throws through the middle. Small climbs and resets within the pocket help Carr preserve the platform from which that passing rhythm works. Best Available is less satisfied with the consistency of his throwing motion and identifies resulting timing and accuracy variation. It also credits anticipation and the touch to clear an underneath defender. The disagreement concerns repeatability, rather than whether Carr has shown the delivery and placement needed to complete those throws.

04Moving on is possible; doing it on time is harder

Roberts identifies a tendency to trust the first read too long. Teets documents work to second and backside options, but also stalls at the second read, double-clutches and missed threats at the second level. Those accounts do not support calling Carr incapable of progressing. They point to uneven speed and decisiveness within the progression. Reaching a checkdown promptly can prevent the later attempt into a window that has already closed. Best Available’s positive processing and anticipation assessment belongs beside those concerns. Carr can reach the right answer in rhythm. The next gain is keeping that process moving when the initial picture is less cooperative, before a window that was available becomes a throw the defense can contest.

05Keep the solution within reach

Teets finds a reliable base in a clean pocket but a breakdown in mechanics and decisions when pressure arrives. Throws made from improvised platforms can lose both accuracy and velocity. Extending the play then becomes costly if the attempt reaches a receiver late and without the original pace. Roberts also warns that confidence can become a forced throw, particularly when Carr cannot solve the disruption through movement. His limited running threat makes disciplined pocket answers more important. The offense benefits when he chooses an available completion promptly or ends the play before conviction turns into an unnecessary attempt.

The case for the player

Strengths

  • Touch and anticipation can create a catchable path through coverage.

  • Connected footwork can deliver the ball without wasted motion.

The questions that remain

Concerns

  • Pausing within the progression can give coverage time to recover.

  • Confidence sometimes outlasts the available throwing window.

Building the fit

NFL role and scheme fit

Use a structured passing game that gives Carr defined timing and layered intermediate options. His best operation comes when he can connect the read, the feet and the release without needing an extended scramble to create the answer.

The Draftanomics view

Bottom line

Carr has shown the touch and anticipation to reward a well-timed call. More consistent delivery and restraint would help those useful plays become a steadier part of the offense.

Sources & edition

The Draftanomics assessment, synthesized from attributed reporting. Role and development language expresses scouting opinion.

Preseason synthesis of published evaluations and official college records, reviewed September 12, 2026. This edition does not assess 2026 game film.

Edition reviewed September 12, 2026. Replaces fragmented sections with connected technical analysis, explicit evaluator disagreements and a defined role assessment.

The original August edition remains preserved. This is a revised Draftanomics assessment, with supporting sources attached to each statement.

View the 5 referenced sources
Read statement references

Every passage remains linked to its supporting sources. Open a section to inspect the assessment and its evidence.

Sources for overview
  1. House assessment

    Carr gives an offense a workable rhythm from the pocket. His feet and delivery can bring the ball to a developing window before the coverage closes it. The key question is how much of that operation survives when the first answer disappears or pressure interrupts the throw.

Sources for one full season to examine
  1. House assessment

    Notre Dame records 12 starts for Carr in 2025 after his redshirt introduction in 2024. He completed 195 passes at 66.7 percent for 2,741 yards and 24 touchdowns. The first full season includes 354 passing yards and four touchdowns against Arkansas, followed later by 342 yards and two touchdowns against NC State.

Sources for choose the shape of the throw
  1. House assessment

    Ryan Roberts credits Carr with varying arm speed to deliver touch at intermediate and deeper levels. His confidence lets him attempt throws into contested windows instead of waiting for a receiver to become obviously uncovered. That conviction is useful when the placement matches the defender’s position and the route’s timing.

  2. House assessment

    Sam Teets makes a helpful distinction between velocity to the far side on shorter throws and the strength needed to drive a very deep ball. He credits the former while describing downfield underthrows. A throw that arrives quickly across the field does not establish the same margin on a much longer trajectory.

Sources for rhythm begins below the release
  1. House assessment

    SparkScouting describes a compact, repeatable release and footwork connected to the progression. Its intermediate examples include digs, outs and layered throws through the middle. Small climbs and resets within the pocket help Carr preserve the platform from which that passing rhythm works.

  2. House assessment

    Best Available is less satisfied with the consistency of his throwing motion and identifies resulting timing and accuracy variation. It also credits anticipation and the touch to clear an underneath defender. The disagreement concerns repeatability, rather than whether Carr has shown the delivery and placement needed to complete those throws.

    • Best Available — CJ Carr evaluation · Retained transcript-context observations; retained observation IDs 0567e749f1776c8d27a8, 3c536cc7de6b89fc7c56, 0fde73740886b72ffdd8, 12627deb8c029b519369, 48b0001909a97266c5a4, 6a65810e6905c3708139, 43ba1f28b8639808c6cf, 67c3cc62118e5daa56bd; timestamps 1257s, 1280s, 1337s, 1337s, 1377s, 1394s, 1377s, 1430s
Sources for moving on is possible; doing it on time is harder
  1. House assessment

    Roberts identifies a tendency to trust the first read too long. Teets documents work to second and backside options, but also stalls at the second read, double-clutches and missed threats at the second level. Those accounts do not support calling Carr incapable of progressing. They point to uneven speed and decisiveness within the progression. Reaching a checkdown promptly can prevent the later attempt into a window that has already closed.

  2. House assessment

    Best Available’s positive processing and anticipation assessment belongs beside those concerns. Carr can reach the right answer in rhythm. The next gain is keeping that process moving when the initial picture is less cooperative, before a window that was available becomes a throw the defense can contest.

    • Best Available — CJ Carr evaluation · Retained transcript-context observations; retained observation IDs 0567e749f1776c8d27a8, 3c536cc7de6b89fc7c56, 0fde73740886b72ffdd8, 12627deb8c029b519369, 48b0001909a97266c5a4, 6a65810e6905c3708139, 43ba1f28b8639808c6cf, 67c3cc62118e5daa56bd; timestamps 1257s, 1280s, 1337s, 1337s, 1377s, 1394s, 1377s, 1430s
Sources for keep the solution within reach
  1. House assessment

    Teets finds a reliable base in a clean pocket but a breakdown in mechanics and decisions when pressure arrives. Throws made from improvised platforms can lose both accuracy and velocity. Extending the play then becomes costly if the attempt reaches a receiver late and without the original pace.

  2. House assessment

    Roberts also warns that confidence can become a forced throw, particularly when Carr cannot solve the disruption through movement. His limited running threat makes disciplined pocket answers more important. The offense benefits when he chooses an available completion promptly or ends the play before conviction turns into an unnecessary attempt.

Sources for intermediate placement
  1. House assessment

    Touch and anticipation can create a catchable path through coverage.

    • Best Available — CJ Carr evaluation · Retained transcript-context observations; retained observation IDs 0567e749f1776c8d27a8, 3c536cc7de6b89fc7c56, 0fde73740886b72ffdd8, 12627deb8c029b519369, 48b0001909a97266c5a4, 6a65810e6905c3708139, 43ba1f28b8639808c6cf, 67c3cc62118e5daa56bd; timestamps 1257s, 1280s, 1337s, 1337s, 1377s, 1394s, 1377s, 1430s
Sources for pocket rhythm
  1. House assessment

    Connected footwork can deliver the ball without wasted motion.

Sources for delayed decisions
  1. House assessment

    Pausing within the progression can give coverage time to recover.

Sources for forced attempts
  1. House assessment

    Confidence sometimes outlasts the available throwing window.

Sources for role and deployment
  1. House assessment

    Use a structured passing game that gives Carr defined timing and layered intermediate options. His best operation comes when he can connect the read, the feet and the release without needing an extended scramble to create the answer.

Sources for the decision
  1. House assessment

    Carr has shown the touch and anticipation to reward a well-timed call. More consistent delivery and restraint would help those useful plays become a steadier part of the offense.

    • Best Available — CJ Carr evaluation · Retained transcript-context observations; retained observation IDs 0567e749f1776c8d27a8, 3c536cc7de6b89fc7c56, 0fde73740886b72ffdd8, 12627deb8c029b519369, 48b0001909a97266c5a4, 6a65810e6905c3708139, 43ba1f28b8639808c6cf, 67c3cc62118e5daa56bd; timestamps 1257s, 1280s, 1337s, 1337s, 1377s, 1394s, 1377s, 1430s

College record & draft context

College production, measurables, experience, and the prospect's place on the sealed Public Draft Board.

Public Draft Board

Public Draft Board rank
#22
Position rank
QB4
Contributing sources
33
Movement since prior snapshot
Down 1

Sealed snapshot as of August 31, 2026 · equal-weight aggregation of public boards, minimum 3 sources for a rank · The Public Draft Board

College production

Passing
StatisticSeason 2025
Attempts293
Completions195
Completion %67%
Passing yards2741
Yards per attempt9.4
Passing TD24
Interceptions6
Rushing
StatisticSeason 2025
Carries41
Rushing yards33
Yards per carry0.8
Rushing TD3
Long28

Seasons of evidence: 1. Games played, snap counts, and usage shares are not in the retained data. An em dash means the value is not in the dataset, not zero.

Evidence notes

  • The retained data contains one season of passing, rushing production (2025).
  • The newest college season in the retained data is 2025; the 2026 season is not yet included.
  • No verified athletic testing is included in the sealed dataset for this prospect.
  • 33 contributing public boards rank this prospect; the Public Draft Board places him at #22.
  • The aggregate public rank fell 1 spot between the two most recent sealed weekly snapshots.

Each note restates a displayed fact. None is a forecast of NFL performance.

Experience and measurements

Listed height
6'2"
Listed weight
215 lb
Class
Sophomore
Age
Not in dataset
Recorded school
Notre Dame
Former school
Not in dataset
Hometown
Saline, MI
Jersey
#13
Recruiting stars
4-star
Recruiting rank
#68 nationally

"Not in dataset" means the value is absent from the sealed dossier dataset, not that it does not exist.

Athletic testing

Not included in the sealed dataset. No combine, pro-day, or RAS value is retained for the 2027 class; absence here does not mean no testing has taken place.

Listed roster height and weight (CollegeFootballData); no verified athletic testing is retained. Bio captured August 29, 2026.

Historical comparisons

Historical profile comparisons are being rebuilt.

Sources and methodology

  • Retained bio and measurements: Draftanomics prospect ingest (CollegeFootballData rosters and recruiting), retained seed data/seed/prospects_upcoming_full.parquet.
  • Retained college production: CollegeFootballData season statistics via the retained player cross-reference; position-relevant categories only; all-zero category rows dropped.
  • Age: unavailable — no birth date or age is retained for the 2027 class.
  • Transfer history: not retained — the page shows the current school and, where the frozen id names a different school, the former school.
  • Public Draft Board: sealed snapshot as of August 31, 2026; per-source ranks are not published under the aggregate-only source policy.

Board methodologyDossier methodologyResearch status

Board position reflects aggregated public opinion; the scouting report is a separate editorial assessment.