Draftanomics
  • 2027 board
  • Consensus board
  • 2028 way-too-early
  • Draft news
  • Simulator
  • The house mock
  • Draft order
  • Trade calculator
  • The Scouting Slate
  • Sleepers & reaches
  • Movers & fallers
  • Player comps
  • Dynasty rookie board
  • Track record
  • Past drafts, re-graded
  • Analyst leaderboard
My rankingsAccount
Get the weekly →
Draftanomics

Honest NFL Draft analytics. The model's receipts against actual NFL teams live on the track record.

Boards
  • 2027 board
  • Consensus board
  • Sleepers
Tools
  • Mock draft simulator
  • Plays Like
  • Dynasty rookie board
Track Record
  • Year-by-year results
  • Accountability Index
  • Our board, on the record
  • Past drafts, re-graded
  • Methodology
  • Developers · free API
  • About
Account
  • My board
  • Weekly email
Data + sources
RAS by Kent Lee Platte·Consensus Big Board (Arif Hasan)·nflverse·PFR·CFBD·All sources & credits·Methodology
Career-value model, live
Privacy·Terms·Press ⌘K to search·Draftanomics2026
  1. Draftanomics/
  2. Prospects/
  3. 2015 board/
  4. Compare

Side-by-side comparison

Backtest

3 prospects · 2015 draft

Each spoke: percentile within the prospect's own position (OLB, EDGE)
MS
Martrell Spaight
OLB · Arkansas
21.7 yo · — · —
SR
Shaquille Riddick
EDGE · West Virginia
21.9 yo · — · —
NO
Nate Orchard
EDGE · Utah
22.3 yo · 6'3" · 250 lb

Headline metrics

The four numbers a GM checks first.

Martrell Spaight
Predicted pick
#5
range #1–#22
Bust probability
21%
Consensus rank
—
no boards yet
Career arc
arrives after the combineThe forecast needs his measurables first.
2nd-deal AAV
$9Mmodel
Shaquille Riddick
Predicted pick
#10
range #1–#27
Bust probability
44%
Consensus rank
—
no boards yet
Career arc
arrives after the combineThe forecast needs his measurables first.
2nd-deal AAV
$16Mmodel
Nate Orchard
Predicted pick
#17
range #7–#27
Bust probability
26%
Consensus rank
—
no boards yet
Career arc
arrives after the combineThe forecast needs his measurables first.
2nd-deal AAV
$13Mmodel

Feature radar

Each axis is the prospect's percentile among prospects at his position (0–100). Bigger shape = stronger across the board.

ProductionAthleticismAgeConsensusPer-play impact (PPA)Breakout ageWorkloadRAS × production
Prospects
  • Martrell Spaight· EDGE / DL / LB
  • Shaquille Riddick· EDGE / DL / LB
  • Nate Orchard· EDGE / DL / LB
Axis leaders
  • ProductionMartrell Spaight0
  • AthleticismMartrell Spaight42
  • AgeMartrell Spaight99
  • ConsensusMartrell Spaight89
  • Per-play impact (PPA)Martrell Spaight50
  • Breakout ageMartrell Spaight50
  • WorkloadMartrell Spaight50
  • RAS × productionMartrell Spaight100

Comp overlap

Top five historical comps per prospect. Shared comps highlighted.

No shared comps in the top five. Each prospect has a distinct historical profile.
Martrell Spaight
  • comps arrive after the combineBefore the combine there isn't enough measured data to match him confidently against past players. Comparisons draw on recent NFL careers (2021–2024) and fill in once combine numbers and game-by-game stats land.
Shaquille Riddick
  • comps arrive after the combineBefore the combine there isn't enough measured data to match him confidently against past players. Comparisons draw on recent NFL careers (2021–2024) and fill in once combine numbers and game-by-game stats land.
Nate Orchard
  • comps arrive after the combineBefore the combine there isn't enough measured data to match him confidently against past players. Comparisons draw on recent NFL careers (2021–2024) and fill in once combine numbers and game-by-game stats land.

Risk and opportunity flags

Top three concerns and top two upside signals from the model.

Martrell Spaight
Risks
  • No athletic testing
    No Combine drills or Pro Day numbers on file while most of the class has tested — the athletic part of the grade is unmeasured.
  • Not on any consensus board
    Model has him at pick #5 but ZERO public big boards have him on their list. Either we're seeing something nobody else does, or the model is hallucinating.
Opportunities
No standout upside flags.
Shaquille Riddick
Risks
  • Missed entire rookie season
    Drafted #158 by ARI in 2015 but recorded ZERO regular-season NFL snaps. Year-1 absence is one of the strongest single-signal bust predictors we have.
  • No athletic testing
    No Combine drills or Pro Day numbers on file while most of the class has tested — the athletic part of the grade is unmeasured.
  • Not on any consensus board
    Model has him at pick #10 but ZERO public big boards have him on their list. Either we're seeing something nobody else does, or the model is hallucinating.
Opportunities
No standout upside flags.
Nate Orchard
Risks
  • Not on any consensus board
    Model has him at pick #17 but ZERO public big boards have him on their list. Either we're seeing something nobody else does, or the model is hallucinating.
Opportunities
No standout upside flags.

Career trajectory forecast

Projected share of his team's snaps across the first four NFL seasons. Solid = seasons already played, dashed = the forecast.

0%25%50%75%100%Y1Y2Y3Y4Snap share
Martrell SpaightShaquille RiddickNate Orchard· solid = actuals, dashed = forecast

Verdict

The model's plain-English read.

Martrell Spaight

Draftanomics projects Martrell Spaight (age 21.7 at draft) as a top-10 pick at #5 (range #1-#22, moderate band). Bust probability sits at 21% — manageable. No Combine drills or Pro Day numbers on file while most of the class has tested — the athletic part of the grade is unmeasured. The call is a hold: no public board ranks him, so the model's #5 stands alone — and with bust risk at 21%, let the room catch up before paying a premium.

Shaquille Riddick

Draftanomics projects Shaquille Riddick (age 21.9 at draft) as a top-10 pick at #10 (range #1-#27, wide band). Bust probability sits at 44% — real but not disqualifying. Drafted #158 by ARI in 2015 but recorded ZERO regular-season NFL snaps. Year-1 absence is one of the strongest single-signal bust predictors we have. The call is a hold: no public board ranks him, so the model's #10 stands alone — and with bust risk at 44%, let the room catch up before paying a premium.

Nate Orchard

Draftanomics projects Nate Orchard (age 22.3 at draft) as a first-round pick at #17 (range #7-#27, moderate band). Bust probability sits at 26% — manageable. The call is a hold: no public board ranks him, so the model's #17 stands alone — and with bust risk at 26%, let the room catch up before paying a premium.