Draftanomics
  • 2027 board
  • Consensus board
  • 2028 way-too-early
  • Draft news
  • Simulator
  • The house mock
  • Draft order
  • Trade calculator
  • The Scouting Slate
  • Sleepers & reaches
  • Movers & fallers
  • Player comps
  • Dynasty rookie board
  • Track record
  • Past drafts, re-graded
  • Analyst leaderboard
My rankingsAccount
Get the weekly →
Draftanomics

Honest NFL Draft analytics. The model's receipts against actual NFL teams live on the track record.

Boards
  • 2027 board
  • Consensus board
  • Sleepers
Tools
  • Mock draft simulator
  • Plays Like
  • Dynasty rookie board
Track Record
  • Year-by-year results
  • Accountability Index
  • Our board, on the record
  • Past drafts, re-graded
  • Methodology
  • Developers · free API
  • About
Account
  • My board
  • Weekly email
Data + sources
RAS by Kent Lee Platte·Consensus Big Board (Arif Hasan)·nflverse·PFR·CFBD·All sources & credits·Methodology
Career-value model, live
Privacy·Terms·Press ⌘K to search·Draftanomics2026
  1. Draftanomics/
  2. Prospects/
  3. 2016 board/
  4. Compare

Side-by-side comparison

Backtest

3 prospects · 2016 draft

Each spoke: percentile within the prospect's own position (G)
PE
Parker Ehinger
G · Cincinnati
— · — · —
JD
Joe Dahl
G · Washington St.
— · — · —
RO
Rees Odhiambo
G · Boise St.
— · — · —

Headline metrics

The four numbers a GM checks first.

Parker Ehinger
Predicted pick
#144
range #134–#154
Bust probability
69%
Consensus rank
#46
on 1 board
Career arc
arrives after the combineThe forecast needs his measurables first.
2nd-deal AAV
$5Mmodel
Joe Dahl
Predicted pick
#182
range #172–#192
Bust probability
5%
Consensus rank
#143
on 1 board
Career arc
arrives after the combineThe forecast needs his measurables first.
2nd-deal AAV
$4Mmodel
Rees Odhiambo
Predicted pick
#220
range #206–#234
Bust probability
78%
Consensus rank
—
no boards yet
Career arc
arrives after the combineThe forecast needs his measurables first.
2nd-deal AAV
$5Mmodel

Feature radar

Each axis is the prospect's percentile among prospects at his position (0–100). Bigger shape = stronger across the board.

ProductionAthleticismAgeConsensusPer-play impact (PPA)Breakout ageWorkloadRAS × production
Prospects
  • Parker Ehinger· Offensive line
  • Joe Dahl· Offensive line
  • Rees Odhiambo· Offensive line
Axis leaders
  • ProductionParker Ehinger50
  • AthleticismParker Ehinger43
  • AgeJoe Dahl68
  • ConsensusJoe Dahl21
  • Per-play impact (PPA)Parker Ehinger50
  • Breakout ageParker Ehinger50
  • WorkloadParker Ehinger50
  • RAS × productionParker Ehinger35

Comp overlap

Top five historical comps per prospect. Shared comps highlighted.

No shared comps in the top five. Each prospect has a distinct historical profile.
Parker Ehinger
  • comps arrive after the combineBefore the combine there isn't enough measured data to match him confidently against past players. Comparisons draw on recent NFL careers (2021–2024) and fill in once combine numbers and game-by-game stats land.
Joe Dahl
  • comps arrive after the combineBefore the combine there isn't enough measured data to match him confidently against past players. Comparisons draw on recent NFL careers (2021–2024) and fill in once combine numbers and game-by-game stats land.
Rees Odhiambo
  • comps arrive after the combineBefore the combine there isn't enough measured data to match him confidently against past players. Comparisons draw on recent NFL careers (2021–2024) and fill in once combine numbers and game-by-game stats land.

Risk and opportunity flags

Top three concerns and top two upside signals from the model.

Parker Ehinger
Risks
  • No athletic testing
    No Combine drills or Pro Day numbers on file while most of the class has tested — the athletic part of the grade is unmeasured.
Opportunities
  • Consensus says higher
    2 boards have him at mean rank #112; model has him #144 — a 32-spot fade. Analysts converging this much above the model is a tell that the model is undervaluing him.
Joe Dahl
Risks
  • No athletic testing
    No Combine drills or Pro Day numbers on file while most of the class has tested — the athletic part of the grade is unmeasured.
Opportunities
  • Consensus says higher
    2 boards have him at mean rank #110; model has him #182 — a 72-spot fade. Analysts converging this much above the model is a tell that the model is undervaluing him.
Rees Odhiambo
Risks
  • No athletic testing
    No Combine drills or Pro Day numbers on file while most of the class has tested — the athletic part of the grade is unmeasured.
Opportunities
  • Consensus says higher
    1 board have him at mean rank #148; model has him #220 — a 72-spot fade. Analysts converging this much above the model is a tell that the model is undervaluing him.

Career trajectory forecast

Projected share of his team's snaps across the first four NFL seasons. Solid = seasons already played, dashed = the forecast.

0%25%50%75%100%Y1Y2Y3Y4Snap share
Parker EhingerJoe DahlRees Odhiambo· solid = actuals, dashed = forecast

Verdict

The model's plain-English read.

Parker Ehinger

Draftanomics projects Parker Ehinger as a mid-round flyer at #144 (range #134-#154, moderate band). Bust probability sits at 69% — scary. No Combine drills or Pro Day numbers on file while most of the class has tested — the athletic part of the grade is unmeasured. The call is a genuine fade: the room's consensus prices him around #112 and the model won't take him before #144 — a 32-spot markdown. A 69% bust probability backs the 32-spot markdown.

Joe Dahl

Draftanomics projects Joe Dahl as a Day 3 dart throw at #182 (range #172-#192, moderate band). Bust probability sits at 5% — low. No Combine drills or Pro Day numbers on file while most of the class has tested — the athletic part of the grade is unmeasured. The call is a genuine fade: the room's consensus prices him around #110 and the model won't take him before #182 — a 72-spot markdown. The 72-spot markdown rests on thin verified signal rather than a named flaw — the model hasn't seen enough yet to match the room's conviction.

Rees Odhiambo

Draftanomics projects Rees Odhiambo as a Day 3 dart throw at #220 (range #206-#234, wide band). Bust probability sits at 78% — scary. No Combine drills or Pro Day numbers on file while most of the class has tested — the athletic part of the grade is unmeasured. The call is a genuine fade: the room's consensus prices him around #148 and the model won't take him before #220 — a 72-spot markdown. A 78% bust probability backs the 72-spot markdown.