3 prospects · 2016 draft
The four numbers a GM checks first.
Each axis is the prospect's percentile among prospects at his position (0–100). Bigger shape = stronger across the board.
Top five historical comps per prospect. Shared comps highlighted.
Top three concerns and top two upside signals from the model.
Projected share of his team's snaps across the first four NFL seasons. Solid = seasons already played, dashed = the forecast.
The model's plain-English read.
Draftanomics projects Daniel Lasco (age 23.5 at draft) as a Day 3 dart throw at #189 (range #187-#191, tight projection). Bust probability sits at 70% — scary. Age 23.5 at draft. Slightly older than the cohort median (~22.5); upside ceiling is trimmed. The call is a genuine fade: the room's consensus prices him around #138 and the model won't take him before #189 — a 51-spot markdown. The discount is earned — older prospect leads the case against.
Draftanomics projects Paul Perkins (age 21.4 at draft) as a Day 2 pick at #64 (range #62-#66, tight projection). Bust probability sits at 0% — low. PPA avg_all 0.232 — per-snap contribution is below-average for the position. Volume stats overstate the impact. The call is a value lean: #64 against a consensus #82 is a 18-spot edge — enough to move him up the queue, not enough to reach a round early, with negative per-play impact the tax on that edge.
Draftanomics projects C.J. Prosise (age 21.9 at draft) as a Day 2 pick at #48 (range #46-#50, tight projection). Bust probability sits at 0% — low. School SP+ 22.4 (FBS INDEPENDENTS). Strong program among non-Power-5 — the prospect dominated against decent competition. PPA avg_all 0.252 — per-snap contribution is below-average for the position. Volume stats overstate the impact. The call is a conviction buy: the model has him 33 spots ahead of the room (board #48 vs consensus #81), and at a 0% bust probability the edge is worth paying for.