Draftanomics
  • 2027 board
  • Consensus board
  • 2028 way-too-early
  • Draft news
  • Simulator
  • The house mock
  • Draft order
  • Trade calculator
  • The Scouting Slate
  • Sleepers & reaches
  • Movers & fallers
  • Player comps
  • Dynasty rookie board
  • Track record
  • Past drafts, re-graded
  • Analyst leaderboard
My rankingsAccount
Get the weekly →
Draftanomics

Honest NFL Draft analytics. The model's receipts against actual NFL teams live on the track record.

Boards
  • 2027 board
  • Consensus board
  • Sleepers
Tools
  • Mock draft simulator
  • Plays Like
  • Dynasty rookie board
Track Record
  • Year-by-year results
  • Accountability Index
  • Our board, on the record
  • Past drafts, re-graded
  • Methodology
  • Developers · free API
  • About
Account
  • My board
  • Weekly email
Data + sources
RAS by Kent Lee Platte·Consensus Big Board (Arif Hasan)·nflverse·PFR·CFBD·All sources & credits·Methodology
Career-value model, live
Privacy·Terms·Press ⌘K to search·Draftanomics2026
  1. Draftanomics/
  2. Prospects/
  3. 2016 board/
  4. Compare

Side-by-side comparison

Backtest

3 prospects · 2016 draft

Each spoke: percentile within the prospect's own position (ILB)
SI
Scooby Wright III
ILB · Arizona
21.7 yo · 6'0" · 239 lb
RR
Reggie Ragland
ILB · Alabama
22.6 yo · 6'1" · 247 lb
NV
Nick Vigil
ILB · Utah St.
22.7 yo · — · —

Headline metrics

The four numbers a GM checks first.

Scooby Wright III
Predicted pick
#149
range #139–#159
Bust probability
55%
Consensus rank
#83
on 6 boards
Career arc
arrives after the combineThe forecast needs his measurables first.
2nd-deal AAV
$5Mmodel
Reggie Ragland
Predicted pick
#7
range #1–#14
Bust probability
65%
Consensus rank
#12
on 20 boards
Career arc
arrives after the combineThe forecast needs his measurables first.
2nd-deal AAV
$8Mmodel
Nick Vigil
Predicted pick
#41
range #31–#51
Bust probability
0%
Consensus rank
#104
on 2 boards
Career arc
arrives after the combineThe forecast needs his measurables first.
2nd-deal AAV
$5Mmodel

Feature radar

Each axis is the prospect's percentile among prospects at his position (0–100). Bigger shape = stronger across the board.

ProductionAthleticismAgeConsensusPer-play impact (PPA)Breakout ageWorkloadRAS × production
Prospects
  • Scooby Wright III· EDGE / DL / LB
  • Reggie Ragland· EDGE / DL / LB
  • Nick Vigil· EDGE / DL / LB
Axis leaders
  • ProductionScooby Wright III50
  • AthleticismScooby Wright III55
  • AgeScooby Wright III87
  • ConsensusReggie Ragland79
  • Per-play impact (PPA)Scooby Wright III50
  • Breakout ageScooby Wright III50
  • WorkloadScooby Wright III50
  • RAS × productionScooby Wright III100

Comp overlap

Top five historical comps per prospect. Shared comps highlighted.

No shared comps in the top five. Each prospect has a distinct historical profile.
Scooby Wright III
  • comps arrive after the combineBefore the combine there isn't enough measured data to match him confidently against past players. Comparisons draw on recent NFL careers (2021–2024) and fill in once combine numbers and game-by-game stats land.
Reggie Ragland
  • comps arrive after the combineBefore the combine there isn't enough measured data to match him confidently against past players. Comparisons draw on recent NFL careers (2021–2024) and fill in once combine numbers and game-by-game stats land.
Nick Vigil
  • comps arrive after the combineBefore the combine there isn't enough measured data to match him confidently against past players. Comparisons draw on recent NFL careers (2021–2024) and fill in once combine numbers and game-by-game stats land.

Risk and opportunity flags

Top three concerns and top two upside signals from the model.

Scooby Wright III
Risks
No major risks flagged.
Opportunities
  • Consensus says higher
    7 boards have him at mean rank #85; model has him #149 — a 64-spot fade. Analysts converging this much above the model is a tell that the model is undervaluing him.
Reggie Ragland
Risks
  • Missed entire rookie season
    Drafted #41 by BUF in 2016 but recorded ZERO regular-season NFL snaps. Year-1 absence is one of the strongest single-signal bust predictors we have.
Opportunities
No standout upside flags.
Nick Vigil
Risks
  • No athletic testing
    No Combine drills or Pro Day numbers on file while most of the class has tested — the athletic part of the grade is unmeasured.
  • Consensus skeptic
    3 boards place him at mean rank #110; model has him #41 — a 69-spot gap. When boards fade a player this hard, the model is usually the one missing something.
Opportunities
No standout upside flags.

Career trajectory forecast

Projected share of his team's snaps across the first four NFL seasons. Solid = seasons already played, dashed = the forecast.

0%25%50%75%100%Y1Y2Y3Y4Snap share
Scooby Wright IIIReggie RaglandNick Vigil· solid = actuals, dashed = forecast

Verdict

The model's plain-English read.

Scooby Wright III

Draftanomics projects Scooby Wright III (age 21.7 at draft) as a mid-round flyer at #149 (range #139-#159, moderate band). Bust probability sits at 55% — elevated. The call is a genuine fade: the room's consensus prices him around #85 and the model won't take him before #149 — a 64-spot markdown. A 55% bust probability backs the 64-spot markdown.

Reggie Ragland

Draftanomics projects Reggie Ragland (age 22.6 at draft) as a top-10 pick at #7 (range #1-#14, moderate band). Bust probability sits at 65% — scary. Drafted #41 by BUF in 2016 but recorded ZERO regular-season NFL snaps. Year-1 absence is one of the strongest single-signal bust predictors we have. The call is a hold at slot: the model's #7 sits within 12 spots of the room's #19 — no market edge to chase, so take him where he sits, and let the 65% bust probability break ties on draft day.

Nick Vigil

Draftanomics projects Nick Vigil (age 22.7 at draft) as a Day 2 pick at #41 (range #31-#51, moderate band). Bust probability sits at 0% — low. No Combine drills or Pro Day numbers on file while most of the class has tested — the athletic part of the grade is unmeasured. The call is a conviction buy: the model has him 69 spots ahead of the room (board #41 vs consensus #110), and at a 0% bust probability the edge is worth paying for.