3 prospects · 2016 draft
The four numbers a GM checks first.
Each axis is the prospect's percentile among prospects at his position (0–100). Bigger shape = stronger across the board.
Top five historical comps per prospect. Shared comps highlighted.
Top three concerns and top two upside signals from the model.
Projected share of his team's snaps across the first four NFL seasons. Solid = seasons already played, dashed = the forecast.
The model's plain-English read.
Draftanomics projects Jihad Ward (age 22.0 at draft) as a third-round / early Day 3 pick at #91 (range #77-#105, wide band). Bust probability sits at 0% — low. No Combine drills or Pro Day numbers on file while most of the class has tested — the athletic part of the grade is unmeasured. The call is a lean fade: the model sits 18 spots below the room's consensus #73 — don't pay sticker price. The 18-spot markdown rests on thin verified signal rather than a named flaw — the model hasn't seen enough yet to match the room's conviction.
Draftanomics projects Emmanuel Ogbah (age 22.5 at draft) as a third-round / early Day 3 pick at #80 (range #73-#87, moderate band). Bust probability sits at 0% — low. The call is a genuine fade: the room's consensus prices him around #36 and the model won't take him before #80 — a 44-spot markdown. The 44-spot markdown rests on thin verified signal rather than a named flaw — the model hasn't seen enough yet to match the room's conviction.
Draftanomics projects Kamalei Correa (age 22.0 at draft) as a third-round / early Day 3 pick at #103 (range #93-#113, moderate band). Bust probability sits at 3% — low. The call is a genuine fade: the room's consensus prices him around #63 and the model won't take him before #103 — a 40-spot markdown. The 40-spot markdown rests on thin verified signal rather than a named flaw — the model hasn't seen enough yet to match the room's conviction.