Draftanomics
  • 2027 board
  • Consensus board
  • 2028 way-too-early
  • Draft news
  • Simulator
  • The house mock
  • Draft order
  • Trade calculator
  • The Scouting Slate
  • Sleepers & reaches
  • Movers & fallers
  • Player comps
  • Dynasty rookie board
  • Track record
  • Past drafts, re-graded
  • Analyst leaderboard
My rankingsAccount
Get the weekly →
Draftanomics

Honest NFL Draft analytics. The model's receipts against actual NFL teams live on the track record.

Boards
  • 2027 board
  • Consensus board
  • Sleepers
Tools
  • Mock draft simulator
  • Plays Like
  • Dynasty rookie board
Track Record
  • Year-by-year results
  • Accountability Index
  • Our board, on the record
  • Past drafts, re-graded
  • Methodology
  • Developers · free API
  • About
Account
  • My board
  • Weekly email
Data + sources
RAS by Kent Lee Platte·Consensus Big Board (Arif Hasan)·nflverse·PFR·CFBD·All sources & credits·Methodology
Career-value model, live
Privacy·Terms·Press ⌘K to search·Draftanomics2026
  1. Draftanomics/
  2. Prospects/
  3. 2016 board/
  4. Compare

Side-by-side comparison

Backtest

3 prospects · 2016 draft

Each spoke: percentile within the prospect's own position (OT)
JH
Jerald Hawkins
OT · LSU
— · 6'6" · 305 lb
LC
Le'Raven Clark
OT · Texas Tech
— · 6'5" · 316 lb
CT
Cole Toner
OT · Harvard
— · 6'5" · 306 lb

Headline metrics

The four numbers a GM checks first.

Jerald Hawkins
Predicted pick
#137
range #130–#144
Bust probability· rough estimate
0%
Consensus rank
#66
on 6 boards
Career arc
arrives after the combineThe forecast needs his measurables first.
2nd-deal AAV
$3Mmodel
Le'Raven Clark
Predicted pick
#151
range #144–#158
Bust probability· rough estimate
0%
Consensus rank
#128
on 12 boards
Career arc
arrives after the combineThe forecast needs his measurables first.
2nd-deal AAV
$5Mmodel
Cole Toner
Predicted pick
#81
range #64–#98
Bust probability· rough estimate
12%
Consensus rank
#117
on 1 board
Career arc
arrives after the combineThe forecast needs his measurables first.
2nd-deal AAV
$3Mmodel

Feature radar

Each axis is the prospect's percentile among prospects at his position (0–100). Bigger shape = stronger across the board.

ProductionAthleticismAgeConsensusPer-play impact (PPA)Breakout ageWorkloadRAS × production
Prospects
  • Jerald Hawkins· Offensive line
  • Le'Raven Clark· Offensive line
  • Cole Toner· Offensive line
Axis leaders
  • ProductionJerald Hawkins50
  • AthleticismCole Toner31
  • AgeCole Toner97
  • ConsensusJerald Hawkins21
  • Per-play impact (PPA)Jerald Hawkins50
  • Breakout ageJerald Hawkins50
  • WorkloadJerald Hawkins50
  • RAS × productionJerald Hawkins35

Comp overlap

Top five historical comps per prospect. Shared comps highlighted.

No shared comps in the top five. Each prospect has a distinct historical profile.
Jerald Hawkins
  • comps arrive after the combineBefore the combine there isn't enough measured data to match him confidently against past players. Comparisons draw on recent NFL careers (2021–2024) and fill in once combine numbers and game-by-game stats land.
Le'Raven Clark
  • comps arrive after the combineBefore the combine there isn't enough measured data to match him confidently against past players. Comparisons draw on recent NFL careers (2021–2024) and fill in once combine numbers and game-by-game stats land.
Cole Toner
  • comps arrive after the combineBefore the combine there isn't enough measured data to match him confidently against past players. Comparisons draw on recent NFL careers (2021–2024) and fill in once combine numbers and game-by-game stats land.

Risk and opportunity flags

Top three concerns and top two upside signals from the model.

Jerald Hawkins
Risks
No major risks flagged.
Opportunities
  • Consensus says higher
    7 boards have him at mean rank #70; model has him #137 — a 67-spot fade. Analysts converging this much above the model is a tell that the model is undervaluing him.
Le'Raven Clark
Risks
No major risks flagged.
Opportunities
  • Consensus says higher
    13 boards have him at mean rank #85; model has him #151 — a 66-spot fade. Analysts converging this much above the model is a tell that the model is undervaluing him.
Cole Toner
Risks
  • Consensus skeptic
    2 boards place him at mean rank #186; model has him #81 — a 104-spot gap. When boards fade a player this hard, the model is usually the one missing something.
Opportunities
No standout upside flags.

Career trajectory forecast

Projected share of his team's snaps across the first four NFL seasons. Solid = seasons already played, dashed = the forecast.

0%25%50%75%100%Y1Y2Y3Y4Snap share
Jerald HawkinsLe'Raven ClarkCole Toner· solid = actuals, dashed = forecast

Verdict

The model's plain-English read.

Jerald Hawkins

Draftanomics projects Jerald Hawkins as a mid-round flyer at #137 (range #130-#144, moderate band). Bust probability sits at 0% — low. The call is a genuine fade: the room's consensus prices him around #70 and the model won't take him before #137 — a 67-spot markdown. The 67-spot markdown rests on thin verified signal rather than a named flaw — the model hasn't seen enough yet to match the room's conviction.

Le'Raven Clark

Draftanomics projects Le'Raven Clark as a mid-round flyer at #151 (range #144-#158, moderate band). Bust probability sits at 0% — low. The call is a genuine fade: the room's consensus prices him around #85 and the model won't take him before #151 — a 66-spot markdown. The 66-spot markdown rests on thin verified signal rather than a named flaw — the model hasn't seen enough yet to match the room's conviction.

Cole Toner

Draftanomics projects Cole Toner as a third-round / early Day 3 pick at #81 (range #64-#98, wide band). Bust probability sits at 12% — low. The call is a conviction buy: the model has him 104 spots ahead of the room (board #81 vs consensus #186), and at a 12% bust probability the edge is worth paying for.