Draftanomics
  • 2027 board
  • Consensus board
  • 2028 way-too-early
  • Draft news
  • Simulator
  • The house mock
  • Draft order
  • Trade calculator
  • The Scouting Slate
  • Sleepers & reaches
  • Movers & fallers
  • Player comps
  • Dynasty rookie board
  • Track record
  • Past drafts, re-graded
  • Analyst leaderboard
My rankingsAccount
Get the weekly →
Draftanomics

Honest NFL Draft analytics. The model's receipts against actual NFL teams live on the track record.

Boards
  • 2027 board
  • Consensus board
  • Sleepers
Tools
  • Mock draft simulator
  • Plays Like
  • Dynasty rookie board
Track Record
  • Year-by-year results
  • Accountability Index
  • Our board, on the record
  • Past drafts, re-graded
  • Methodology
  • Developers · free API
  • About
Account
  • My board
  • Weekly email
Data + sources
RAS by Kent Lee Platte·Consensus Big Board (Arif Hasan)·nflverse·PFR·CFBD·All sources & credits·Methodology
Career-value model, live
Privacy·Terms·Press ⌘K to search·Draftanomics2026
  1. Draftanomics/
  2. Prospects/
  3. 2016 board/
  4. Compare

Side-by-side comparison

Backtest

3 prospects · 2016 draft

Each spoke: percentile within the prospect's own position (QB)
JG
Jared Goff
QB · California
21.5 yo · 6'4" · 215 lb
PL
Paxton Lynch
QB · Memphis
22.2 yo · 6'7" · 244 lb
DP
Dak Prescott
QB · Mississippi St.
22.7 yo · — · —

Headline metrics

The four numbers a GM checks first.

Jared Goff
Predicted pick
#27
range #25–#29
Bust probability· rough estimate
0%
Consensus rank
#9
on 20 boards
Career arc
arrives after the combineThe forecast needs his measurables first.
2nd-deal AAV
$44Mmodel
Paxton Lynch
Predicted pick
#35
range #33–#37
Bust probability· rough estimate
0%
Consensus rank
#30
on 20 boards
Career arc
arrives after the combineThe forecast needs his measurables first.
2nd-deal AAV
$9Mmodel
Dak Prescott
Predicted pick
#234
range #232–#236
Bust probability· rough estimate
42%
Consensus rank
#64
on 2 boards
Career arc
arrives after the combineThe forecast needs his measurables first.
2nd-deal AAV
$45Mmodel

Feature radar

Each axis is the prospect's percentile among prospects at his position (0–100). Bigger shape = stronger across the board.

ProductionAthleticismAgeConsensusPer-play impact (PPA)Breakout ageWorkloadRAS × production
Prospects
  • Jared Goff· QB
  • Paxton Lynch· QB
  • Dak Prescott· QB
Axis leaders
  • ProductionDak Prescott50
  • AthleticismPaxton Lynch70
  • AgePaxton Lynch85
  • ConsensusJared Goff100
  • Per-play impact (PPA)Jared Goff50
  • Breakout ageJared Goff50
  • WorkloadJared Goff50
  • RAS × productionPaxton Lynch90

Comp overlap

Top five historical comps per prospect. Shared comps highlighted.

No shared comps in the top five. Each prospect has a distinct historical profile.
Jared Goff
  • comps arrive after the combineBefore the combine there isn't enough measured data to match him confidently against past players. Comparisons draw on recent NFL careers (2021–2024) and fill in once combine numbers and game-by-game stats land.
Paxton Lynch
  • comps arrive after the combineBefore the combine there isn't enough measured data to match him confidently against past players. Comparisons draw on recent NFL careers (2021–2024) and fill in once combine numbers and game-by-game stats land.
Dak Prescott
  • comps arrive after the combineBefore the combine there isn't enough measured data to match him confidently against past players. Comparisons draw on recent NFL careers (2021–2024) and fill in once combine numbers and game-by-game stats land.

Risk and opportunity flags

Top three concerns and top two upside signals from the model.

Jared Goff
Risks
No major risks flagged.
Opportunities
No standout upside flags.
Paxton Lynch
Risks
No major risks flagged.
Opportunities
  • Mid-major standout
    School SP+ 8.0 (AMERICAN ATHLETIC). Strong program among non-Power-5 — the prospect dominated against decent competition.
Dak Prescott
Risks
  • No athletic testing
    No Combine drills or Pro Day numbers on file while most of the class has tested — the athletic part of the grade is unmeasured.
Opportunities
  • Consensus says higher
    3 boards have him at mean rank #117; model has him #234 — a 117-spot fade. Analysts converging this much above the model is a tell that the model is undervaluing him.
  • Breakout production arc
    Career trajectory in passing yards: 194 → 1940 → 3449 → 3793. Production rose every season — the kind of upward arc that often continues into the league.

Career trajectory forecast

Projected share of his team's snaps across the first four NFL seasons. Solid = seasons already played, dashed = the forecast.

0%25%50%75%100%Y1Y2Y3Y4Snap share
Jared GoffPaxton LynchDak Prescott· solid = actuals, dashed = forecast

Verdict

The model's plain-English read.

Jared Goff

Draftanomics projects Jared Goff (age 21.5 at draft) as a first-round pick at #27 (range #25-#29, tight projection). Bust probability sits at 0% — low. The call is a hold at slot: the model's #27 sits within 11 spots of the room's #16 — no market edge to chase, so take him where he sits, and let the 0% bust probability break ties on draft day.

Paxton Lynch

Draftanomics projects Paxton Lynch (age 22.2 at draft) as a Day 2 pick at #35 (range #33-#37, tight projection). Bust probability sits at 0% — low. School SP+ 8.0 (AMERICAN ATHLETIC). Strong program among non-Power-5 — the prospect dominated against decent competition. The call is a hold at slot: the model's #35 and the room's #34 land on the same answer — no market edge to chase, so take him where he sits, and let the 0% bust probability break ties on draft day.

Dak Prescott

Draftanomics projects Dak Prescott (age 22.7 at draft) as a Day 3 dart throw at #234 (range #232-#236, tight projection). Bust probability sits at 42% — real but not disqualifying. Career trajectory in passing yards: 194 → 1940 → 3449 → 3793. Production rose every season — the kind of upward arc that often continues into the league. No Combine drills or Pro Day numbers on file while most of the class has tested — the athletic part of the grade is unmeasured. The call is a genuine fade: the room's consensus prices him around #117 and the model won't take him before #234 — a 117-spot markdown. The 117-spot markdown rests on thin verified signal rather than a named flaw — the model hasn't seen enough yet to match the room's conviction.