Draftanomics
  • 2027 board
  • Consensus board
  • 2028 way-too-early
  • Draft news
  • Simulator
  • The house mock
  • Draft order
  • Trade calculator
  • The Scouting Slate
  • Sleepers & reaches
  • Movers & fallers
  • Player comps
  • Dynasty rookie board
  • Track record
  • Past drafts, re-graded
  • Analyst leaderboard
My rankingsAccount
Get the weekly →
Draftanomics

Honest NFL Draft analytics. The model's receipts against actual NFL teams live on the track record.

Boards
  • 2027 board
  • Consensus board
  • Sleepers
Tools
  • Mock draft simulator
  • Plays Like
  • Dynasty rookie board
Track Record
  • Year-by-year results
  • Accountability Index
  • Our board, on the record
  • Past drafts, re-graded
  • Methodology
  • Developers · free API
  • About
Account
  • My board
  • Weekly email
Data + sources
RAS by Kent Lee Platte·Consensus Big Board (Arif Hasan)·nflverse·PFR·CFBD·All sources & credits·Methodology
Career-value model, live
Privacy·Terms·Press ⌘K to search·Draftanomics2026
  1. Draftanomics/
  2. Prospects/
  3. 2016 board/
  4. Compare

Side-by-side comparison

Backtest

3 prospects · 2016 draft

Each spoke: percentile within the prospect's own position (C)
MT
Max Tuerk
C · USC
— · 6'5" · 298 lb
JH
Joey Hunt
C · TCU
— · — · —
GG
Graham Glasgow
C · Michigan
— · 6'6" · 307 lb

Headline metrics

The four numbers a GM checks first.

Max Tuerk
Predicted pick
#50
range #43–#57
Bust probability
3%
Consensus rank
#157
on 12 boards
Career arc
arrives after the combineThe forecast needs his measurables first.
2nd-deal AAV
$7Mmodel
Joey Hunt
Predicted pick
#171
range #157–#185
Bust probability
49%
Consensus rank
—
no boards yet
Career arc
arrives after the combineThe forecast needs his measurables first.
2nd-deal AAV
$4Mmodel
Graham Glasgow
Predicted pick
#59
range #49–#69
Bust probability
20%
Consensus rank
#140
on 2 boards
Career arc
arrives after the combineThe forecast needs his measurables first.
2nd-deal AAV
$14Mmodel

Feature radar

Each axis is the prospect's percentile among prospects at his position (0–100). Bigger shape = stronger across the board.

ProductionAthleticismAgeConsensusPer-play impact (PPA)Breakout ageWorkloadRAS × production
Prospects
  • Max Tuerk· Offensive line
  • Joey Hunt· Offensive line
  • Graham Glasgow· Offensive line
Axis leaders
  • ProductionMax Tuerk50
  • AthleticismGraham Glasgow59
  • AgeGraham Glasgow88
  • ConsensusMax Tuerk21
  • Per-play impact (PPA)Max Tuerk50
  • Breakout ageMax Tuerk50
  • WorkloadMax Tuerk50
  • RAS × productionMax Tuerk35

Comp overlap

Top five historical comps per prospect. Shared comps highlighted.

No shared comps in the top five. Each prospect has a distinct historical profile.
Max Tuerk
  • comps arrive after the combineBefore the combine there isn't enough measured data to match him confidently against past players. Comparisons draw on recent NFL careers (2021–2024) and fill in once combine numbers and game-by-game stats land.
Joey Hunt
  • comps arrive after the combineBefore the combine there isn't enough measured data to match him confidently against past players. Comparisons draw on recent NFL careers (2021–2024) and fill in once combine numbers and game-by-game stats land.
Graham Glasgow
  • comps arrive after the combineBefore the combine there isn't enough measured data to match him confidently against past players. Comparisons draw on recent NFL careers (2021–2024) and fill in once combine numbers and game-by-game stats land.

Risk and opportunity flags

Top three concerns and top two upside signals from the model.

Max Tuerk
Risks
  • Consensus skeptic
    13 boards place him at mean rank #95; model has him #50 — a 45-spot gap. When boards fade a player this hard, the model is usually the one missing something.
Opportunities
No standout upside flags.
Joey Hunt
Risks
  • No athletic testing
    No Combine drills or Pro Day numbers on file while most of the class has tested — the athletic part of the grade is unmeasured.
  • Consensus skeptic
    1 board place him at mean rank #700; model has him #171 — a 529-spot gap. When boards fade a player this hard, the model is usually the one missing something.
Opportunities
No standout upside flags.
Graham Glasgow
Risks
  • Consensus skeptic
    3 boards place him at mean rank #98; model has him #59 — a 39-spot gap. When boards fade a player this hard, the model is usually the one missing something.
Opportunities
No standout upside flags.

Career trajectory forecast

Projected share of his team's snaps across the first four NFL seasons. Solid = seasons already played, dashed = the forecast.

0%25%50%75%100%Y1Y2Y3Y4Snap share
Max TuerkJoey HuntGraham Glasgow· solid = actuals, dashed = forecast

Verdict

The model's plain-English read.

Max Tuerk

Draftanomics projects Max Tuerk as a Day 2 pick at #50 (range #43-#57, moderate band). Bust probability sits at 3% — low. The call is a conviction buy: the model has him 45 spots ahead of the room (board #50 vs consensus #95), and at a 3% bust probability the edge is worth paying for.

Joey Hunt

Draftanomics projects Joey Hunt as a mid-round flyer at #171 (range #157-#185, wide band). Bust probability sits at 49% — elevated. No Combine drills or Pro Day numbers on file while most of the class has tested — the athletic part of the grade is unmeasured. The call is a conviction buy: the model has him 529 spots ahead of the room (board #171 vs consensus #700) — but size the bet for the 49% bust probability; this is a price edge, not a safety edge.

Graham Glasgow

Draftanomics projects Graham Glasgow as a Day 2 pick at #59 (range #49-#69, moderate band). Bust probability sits at 20% — manageable. The call is a conviction buy: the model has him 39 spots ahead of the room (board #59 vs consensus #98), and at a 20% bust probability the edge is worth paying for.