Draftanomics
  • 2027 board
  • Consensus board
  • 2028 way-too-early
  • Draft news
  • Simulator
  • The house mock
  • Draft order
  • Trade calculator
  • The Scouting Slate
  • Sleepers & reaches
  • Movers & fallers
  • Player comps
  • Dynasty rookie board
  • Track record
  • Past drafts, re-graded
  • Analyst leaderboard
My rankingsAccount
Get the weekly →
Draftanomics

Honest NFL Draft analytics. The model's receipts against actual NFL teams live on the track record.

Boards
  • 2027 board
  • Consensus board
  • Sleepers
Tools
  • Mock draft simulator
  • Plays Like
  • Dynasty rookie board
Track Record
  • Year-by-year results
  • Accountability Index
  • Our board, on the record
  • Past drafts, re-graded
  • Methodology
  • Developers · free API
  • About
Account
  • My board
  • Weekly email
Data + sources
RAS by Kent Lee Platte·Consensus Big Board (Arif Hasan)·nflverse·PFR·CFBD·All sources & credits·Methodology
Career-value model, live
Privacy·Terms·Press ⌘K to search·Draftanomics2026
  1. Draftanomics/
  2. Prospects/
  3. 2019 board/
  4. Compare

Side-by-side comparison

Backtest

2 prospects · 2019 draft

Each spoke: percentile within the prospect's own position (QB)
CT
Clayton Thorson
QB · Northwestern
23.3 yo · 6'4" · 222 lb
JS
Jarrett Stidham
QB · Auburn
22.7 yo · 6'2" · 218 lb
Tiebreaker
High confidence
Take Jarrett Stidham over Clayton Thorson.

Decisive factor: 44-pick gap on Draftanomics projection. Reinforced by a bust risk 15 points lower.

Headline metrics

The four numbers a GM checks first.

Clayton Thorson
Projected range
Rounds 4-6
half went picks 143-225
Bust probability· rough estimate
44%
0%comp-based · 0/4
Consensus rank
#156
on 1 board
Career arc
Franchise
tier · Day 3
2nd-deal AAV
$3.4M-$5.1Mmodel
Jarrett Stidham
Projected range
Rounds 4-6
half went picks 115-207
Bust probability· rough estimate
29%
Consensus rank
#107
on 2 boards
Career arc
arrives after the combineThe forecast needs his measurables first.
2nd-deal AAV
$4.8M-$7.3Mmodel

Feature radar

Each axis is the prospect's percentile among prospects at his position (0–100). Bigger shape = stronger across the board.

ProductionAthleticismAgeConsensusPer-play impact (PPA)Breakout ageWorkloadRAS × production
Prospects
  • Clayton Thorson· QB
  • Jarrett Stidham· QB
Axis leaders
  • ProductionClayton Thorson89
  • AthleticismClayton Thorson36
  • AgeJarrett Stidham77
  • ConsensusClayton Thorson24
  • Per-play impact (PPA)Clayton Thorson50
  • Breakout ageClayton Thorson50
  • WorkloadClayton Thorson50
  • RAS × productionClayton Thorson0

Comp overlap

Top five historical comps per prospect. Shared comps highlighted.

No shared comps in the top five. Each prospect has a distinct historical profile.
Clayton Thorson
  • Trevor Siemian
    QB · #250
    Franchise
  • Jacoby Brissett
    QB · #91
    Starter
  • Sean Mannion
    QB · #89
    Franchise
  • Davis Webb
    QB · #87
    TBD
  • C.J. Beathard
    QB · #104
    Bust
Jarrett Stidham
  • Cody Kessler
    QB · #93
    Starter
  • Brett Hundley
    QB · #147
    Starter
  • Joshua Dobbs
    QB · #135
    TBD
  • Chad Kelly
    QB · #253
    TBD
  • Jeff Driskel
    QB · #207
    TBD

Risk and opportunity flags

Top three concerns and top two upside signals from the model.

Clayton Thorson
Risks
  • Missed entire rookie season
    Drafted #167 by PHI in 2019 but recorded ZERO regular-season NFL snaps. Year-1 absence is one of the strongest single-signal bust predictors we have.
  • Older prospect
    Age 23.3 at draft. Slightly older than the cohort median (~22.5); upside ceiling is trimmed.
  • No athletic testing
    No Combine drills or Pro Day numbers on file while most of the class has tested — the athletic part of the grade is unmeasured.
Opportunities
  • Consensus says higher
    1 board have him at consensus #156; model has him #218 — a 62-spot fade. Analysts converging this much above the model is a tell that the model is undervaluing him.
  • Strong comp group
    3 of 4 closest comps with NFL outcomes became Starters or Franchise players: Trevor Siemian, Jacoby Brissett, Sean Mannion. The historical neighborhood overwhelmingly produced NFL contributors.
Jarrett Stidham
Risks
No major risks flagged.
Opportunities
  • Consensus says higher
    2 boards have him at consensus #107; model has him #174 — a 67-spot fade. Analysts converging this much above the model is a tell that the model is undervaluing him.
  • Strong comp group
    2 of 2 closest comps with NFL outcomes became Starters or Franchise players: Cody Kessler, Brett Hundley. The historical neighborhood overwhelmingly produced NFL contributors.

Career trajectory forecast

Projected share of his team's snaps across the first four NFL seasons. Solid = seasons already played, dashed = the forecast.

0%25%50%75%100%Y1Y2Y3Y4Y5Y6Y7Snap share
Clayton ThorsonJarrett Stidham· solid = actuals, dashed = forecast

Verdict

The model's plain-English read.

Clayton Thorson

Draftanomics projects Clayton Thorson (age 23.3 at draft) as a Day 3 dart throw at #218 (range #176-#260, very wide band — too little on him yet to project tightly). Bust probability sits at 44% — real but not disqualifying. The comp set is strong: 3 of 4 closest comps with known NFL outcomes became starters or better. Closest comps: Trevor Siemian (Franchise), Jacoby Brissett (Starter), Sean Mannion (Franchise). Ceiling is Sean Mannion (Franchise); floor is Davis Webb. Drafted #167 by PHI in 2019 but recorded ZERO regular-season NFL snaps. Year-1 absence is one of the strongest single-signal bust predictors we have. The call is a genuine fade: the room's consensus prices him around #156 and the model won't take him before #218 — a 62-spot markdown. The discount is earned — missed entire rookie season leads the case against.

Jarrett Stidham

Draftanomics projects Jarrett Stidham (age 22.7 at draft) as a mid-round flyer at #174 (range #137-#211, very wide band — too little on him yet to project tightly). Bust probability sits at 29% — manageable. The comp set is strong: 2 of 2 closest comps with known NFL outcomes became starters or better. Closest comps: Cody Kessler (Starter), Brett Hundley (Starter), Joshua Dobbs. Ceiling is Cody Kessler (Starter); floor is Chad Kelly. The call is a genuine fade: the room's consensus prices him around #107 and the model won't take him before #174 — a 67-spot markdown. The 67-spot markdown rests on thin verified signal rather than a named flaw — the model hasn't seen enough yet to match the room's conviction.