Refreshed just now
rank#212
Backtest: model vs. reality
The model graded Jeremy Sprinkle at pick #212; he was actually picked #154 by WAS. 1 NFL season in, he's hung on the fringe of the rotation (grading 5.7 of 20 per season).
Overview
Headline grade, verdict, and the one-line scout take
Draftanomics Rank
Low conviction#212TE·Arkansas
The league moved faster than our board — WAS took him at No. 154, 58 picks ahead of our No. 212 grade. His career is settling that argument now.
Draftanomics's take
Draftanomics had Jeremy Sprinkle at #212 on draft night — a Day 3 grade — and WAS took him at No. 154, 58 picks earlier than our grade. The model's case leans on broad top-100 board coverage. Bust risk projects at 25%, near the position baseline. The room had him #132 pre-draft; our board sat 80 spots lower.
Written from the live model's numbers — projected to round 6, and it updates whenever the model does. See methodology for what drives the take.
Scouting report
The written report — drafted from the fact sheet, every number traceable, honest about what we can't see yet
Why this grade
Which signals drove the grade up or down — in plain English
Consensus
The analyst room, accuracy-weighted, plus where Draftanomics disagrees with it
Production
Measurables, traits, and college play quality
Risk
Bust probability, injury history, character flags, pre-mortem
Team fit
How well this prospect fits each of the 32 team schemes
Will he be there?
Probability he's still on the board at each of your picks
Comps
Historical players this prospect resembles
Film & notes
Clips, scout notes, voice memos, written reports