The model graded Blair Brown at pick #61; he was actually picked #148 by JAX. 1 NFL season in, he's barely gotten on the field (grading 1.3 of 20 per season). So far, the league's caution is winning the argument. Model expects a second-deal AAV around $6M/yr.
Headline grade, verdict, and the one-line scout take
We had him No. 61 on draft night; JAX didn't call his name until No. 148 — a 87-pick gap between our board and the league's. His career is settling that argument now.
Draftanomics had Blair Brown at #61 on draft night — a Day 2 grade — and JAX took him at No. 148, 87 picks later than our grade. The model's case leans on scout consensus. Bust risk projects at 35%, near the position baseline. The room had him #157 pre-draft; our board was 96 spots higher.
Written from the live model's numbers — and it updates whenever the model does. See for what drives the take.
The written report — drafted from the fact sheet, every number traceable, honest about what we can't see yet
Which signals drove the grade up or down — in plain English
The analyst room, accuracy-weighted, plus where Draftanomics disagrees with it
Measurables, traits, and college play quality
Bust probability, injury history, character flags, pre-mortem
How well this prospect fits each of the 32 team schemes
Probability he's still on the board at each of your picks
Historical players this prospect resembles
Clips, scout notes, voice memos, written reports
Too early to project a career arc.
No public board has ranked this prospect and the model has no production, athletic, or NFL data to anchor on — any percentages here would be noise dressed up as precision. The outlook fills in once boards rank him or real numbers land.
2 public boards track this prospect. Per-board breakdown loads with the live board.
Highlight reels indexed from YouTube. Loads only when you press play.
Working in his favor: his charted run def grade career avg. Working against him: scout consensus and how many boards rank him top-100.
The grade is the 0-to-1 score the board sorts by — it only means something next to the rest of this class, which is why the rank above it is the number to quote.
Not enough to go on yet — no public board ranks him and there's no production or testing data to anchor a career projection.
Everything that could go wrong with Blair Brown, gathered in one place — the most serious flags listed first.
Roster-based need returns once the 2016season is played — grading this year’s teams on last year’s depth chart would be guessing. What’s knowable now: the teams holding picks around No. 61, and which of them already spent premium capital at EDGE / DL / LB in the 2016 draft.
Gold means no recent premium investment at EDGE / DL / LB — the cleaner fit on paper. Grey means they already spent one.