Draftanomics
  • 2027 board
  • Consensus board
  • 2028 way-too-early
  • Draft news
  • Simulator
  • The house mock
  • Draft order
  • Trade calculator
  • The Scouting Slate
  • Sleepers & reaches
  • Movers & fallers
  • Player comps
  • Dynasty rookie board
  • Track record
  • Past drafts, re-graded
  • Analyst leaderboard
My rankingsAccountFounders’ rate
Founders’ rate →
Draftanomics

Honest NFL Draft analytics. The model's receipts against actual NFL teams live on the track record.

Boards
  • 2027 board
  • Consensus board
  • Sleepers
Tools
  • Mock draft simulator
  • Plays Like
  • Dynasty rookie board
Track Record
  • Year-by-year results
  • Accountability Index
  • Our board, on the record
  • Past drafts, re-graded
  • Methodology
  • Developers · free API
  • About
Account
  • My board
  • Premium
Data + sources
RAS by Kent Lee Platte·Consensus Big Board (Arif Hasan)·nflverse·PFR·CFBD·All sources & credits·Methodology
Career-value model, live
Privacy·Terms·Press ⌘K to search·Draftanomics2026
  1. Draftanomics/
  2. 2017 board/
  3. NYJ

NYJ

2017 team hubBacktestHaul · B
Refreshed just now
GM:Darren Mougeynew regimehistory →
Scheme:Vertical4-3Man PressPower Setter
Picks
9
1st @ #6
Draft capital
29.2
more capital than 84% of teams
Top model fit
Malik Hooker
S · best blend of grade and roster need
Draft haul
B
Solid value haul (picks averaged 46.0 sp…
🎯Mock as this team
NYJ
TeamTeam hub·
ClassMock draft simulator
Target boardDraft capitalHaul gradeSchemeCap outlook

Who NYJshould take — each prospect's model grade, weighted up where the roster is thin, so highly graded players at positions NYJ needs rise to the top.

50/50 prospects
Rank↑PlayerPosTierCollegePos needModel rankFitWhy he fits
1
Malik Hookerblend#4$10M
SBlue Chip· Ohio St.· model #4
SBlue ChipOhio St.low need#40.84A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board says top-15 talent.
2
Forrest Lampblend#2$12M
GBlue Chip· Western Kentucky· model #2
GBlue ChipWestern Kentuckylow need#20.84A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board says top-15 talent.
3
Ryan Ramczykblend#3$11M
OTBlue Chip· Wisconsin· model #3
OTBlue ChipWisconsinlow need#30.83A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board says top-15 talent.
4
Jamal Adamsblend#7$8M
S1st Round· LSU· model #7
S1st RoundLSUlow need#70.83A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board says top-15 talent.
5
Leonard Fournetteblend#5$9M
RBBlue Chip· LSU· model #5
RBBlue ChipLSUlow need#50.81A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board says top-15 talent.
6
O.J. Howardblend#8$7M
TE1st Round· Alabama· model #8
TE1st RoundAlabamalow need#80.80A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board says top-15 talent.
7
Corey Davisblend#11$6M
WR1st Round· Western Michigan· model #11
WR1st RoundWestern Michiganlow need#110.79A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board says top-15 talent.
8
Dan Feeney
G1st Round· Indiana· model #14
G1st RoundIndianalow need#140.78A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board says top-15 talent.
9
John Rossblend#12$6M
WR1st Round· Washington· model #12
WR1st RoundWashingtonlow need#120.78A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board says top-15 talent.
10
Dalvin Cookblend#13$6M
RB1st Round· Florida St.· model #13
RB1st RoundFlorida St.low need#130.77A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board says top-15 talent.
11
Deshaun Watsonblend#16
QB1st Round· Clemson· model #16
QB1st RoundClemsonlow need#160.76A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a first-rounder.
12
Marshon Lattimoreblend#18$5M
CB1st Round· Ohio St.· model #18
CB1st RoundOhio St.low need#180.73A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a first-rounder.
13
Christian McCaffreyblend#17$5M
RB1st Round· Stanford· model #17
RB1st RoundStanfordlow need#170.73A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a first-rounder.
14
Jabrill Peppersblend#19$4M
S1st Round· Michigan· model #19
S1st RoundMichiganlow need#190.72A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a first-rounder.
15
Nico Siragusa
G1st Round· San Diego St.· model #20
G1st RoundSan Diego St.low need#200.71A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a first-rounder.
16
Jonathan Allenblend#1$12M
EDGEBlue Chip· Alabama· model #1
EDGEBlue ChipAlabamalow need#10.70A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board says top-15 talent.
17
Taylor Moton
G1st Round· Western Michigan· model #22
G1st RoundWestern Michiganlow need#220.68A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a first-rounder.
18
Budda Baker
S1st Round· Washington· model #25
S1st RoundWashingtonlow need#250.68A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a first-rounder.
19
Garett Bollesblend#23$4M
OT1st Round· Utah· model #23
OT1st RoundUtahlow need#230.68A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a first-rounder.
20
Marcus Williams
S1st Round· Utah· model #26
S1st RoundUtahlow need#260.68A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a first-rounder.
21
Obi Melifonwublend#28$4M
S1st Round· Connecticut· model #28
S1st RoundConnecticutlow need#280.67A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a first-rounder.
22
Nathan Gerry
S1st Round· Nebraska· model #29
S1st RoundNebraskalow need#290.67A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a first-rounder.
23
Cam Robinsonblend#27$4M
OT1st Round· Alabama· model #27
OT1st RoundAlabamalow need#270.67A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a first-rounder.
24
Mike Williamsblend#24$4M
WR1st Round· Clemson· model #24
WR1st RoundClemsonlow need#240.66A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a first-rounder.
25
Myles Garrettblend#6$8M
EDGEBlue Chip· Texas A&M· model #6
EDGEBlue ChipTexas A&Mlow need#60.66A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board says top-15 talent.
26
Desmond King
S1st Round· Iowa· model #32
S1st RoundIowalow need#320.66A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a first-rounder.
27
Solomon Thomasblend#9$7M
EDGE1st Round· Stanford· model #9
EDGE1st RoundStanfordlow need#90.65A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board says top-15 talent.
28
Reuben Fosterblend#10$7M
LB1st Round· Alabama· model #10
LB1st RoundAlabamalow need#100.65A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board says top-15 talent.
29
Sidney Jones
CBDay 2· Washington· model #35
CBDay 2Washingtonlow need#350.65A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player.
30
David Njokublend#30$4M
TE1st Round· Miami (FL)· model #30
TE1st RoundMiami (FL)low need#300.64A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a first-rounder.
31
Dion Dawkins
GDay 2· Temple· model #36
GDay 2Templelow need#360.64A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player.
32
Marlon Humphreyblend#37$3M
CBDay 2· Alabama· model #37
CBDay 2Alabamalow need#370.63A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player.
33
Mitchell Trubiskyblend#38
QBDay 2· North Carolina· model #38
QBDay 2North Carolinalow need#380.63A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player.
34
Alvin Kamarablend#33$3M
RBDay 2· Tennessee· model #33
RBDay 2Tennesseelow need#330.63A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player.
35
Justin Evans
SDay 2· Texas A&M· model #40
SDay 2Texas A&Mlow need#400.63A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player.
36
Gareon Conleyblend#43$3M
CBDay 2· Ohio St.· model #43
CBDay 2Ohio St.low need#430.62A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player.
37
Patrick Mahomesblend#44
QBDay 2· Texas Tech· model #44
QBDay 2Texas Techlow need#440.62A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player.
38
Derek Barnettblend#15$5M
EDGE1st Round· Tennessee· model #15
EDGE1st RoundTennesseelow need#150.60A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board says top-15 talent.
39
Isaac Asiata
GDay 2· Utah· model #47
GDay 2Utahlow need#470.60A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player.
40
Antonio Garcia
OTDay 2· Troy· model #49
OTDay 2Troylow need#490.60A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player.
41
Dorian Johnson
GDay 2· Pittsburgh· model #50
GDay 2Pittsburghlow need#500.59A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player.
42
Pat Elflein
CDay 2· Ohio St.· model #51
CDay 2Ohio St.low need#510.59A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player.
43
Evan Engramblend#48$2M
TEDay 2· Mississippi· model #48
TEDay 2Mississippilow need#480.58A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player.
44
Ethan Pocicblend#54$2M
CDay 2· LSU· model #54
CDay 2LSUlow need#540.58A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player.
45
Chuck Clark
CBDay 2· Virginia Tech· model #60
CBDay 2Virginia Techlow need#600.57A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player.
46
Adoree' Jackson
CBDay 2· USC· model #62
CBDay 2USClow need#620.57A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player.
47
Chase Roullier
CDay 2· Wyoming· model #56
CDay 2Wyominglow need#560.57A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player.
48
Kareem Huntblend#52$2M
RBDay 2· Toledo· model #52
RBDay 2Toledolow need#520.57A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player.
49
Chris Godwinblend#53$2M
WRDay 2· Penn St.· model #53
WRDay 2Penn St.low need#530.57A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player.
50
Roderick Johnson
OTDay 2· Florida St.· model #58
OTDay 2Florida St.low need#580.57A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player.