Draftanomics
  • 2027 board
  • Consensus board
  • 2028 way-too-early
  • Draft news
  • Simulator
  • The house mock
  • Draft order
  • Trade calculator
  • The Scouting Slate
  • Sleepers & reaches
  • Movers & fallers
  • Player comps
  • Dynasty rookie board
  • Track record
  • Past drafts, re-graded
  • Analyst leaderboard
My rankingsAccountFounders’ rate
Founders’ rate →
Draftanomics

Honest NFL Draft analytics. The model's receipts against actual NFL teams live on the track record.

Boards
  • 2027 board
  • Consensus board
  • Sleepers
Tools
  • Mock draft simulator
  • Plays Like
  • Dynasty rookie board
Track Record
  • Year-by-year results
  • Accountability Index
  • Our board, on the record
  • Past drafts, re-graded
  • Methodology
  • Developers · free API
  • About
Account
  • My board
  • Premium
Data + sources
RAS by Kent Lee Platte·Consensus Big Board (Arif Hasan)·nflverse·PFR·CFBD·All sources & credits·Methodology
Career-value model, live
Privacy·Terms·Press ⌘K to search·Draftanomics2026
  1. Draftanomics/
  2. 2022 board/
  3. CIN

CIN

2022 team hubBacktestHaul · B-
Refreshed just now
GM:Duke Tobinhistory →
Scheme:Vertical4-3Cover 3Speed Rusher
Picks
6
1st @ #31
Draft capital
9.3
more capital than 28% of teams
Top model fit
Kyle Hamilton
S · best blend of grade and roster need
Draft haul
B-
Solid value haul (picks averaged 11.7 sp…
🎯Mock as this team
CIN
TeamTeam hub·
ClassMock draft simulator
Target boardDraft capitalHaul gradeSchemeCap outlook

Who CINshould take — each prospect's model grade, weighted up where the roster is thin, so highly graded players at positions CIN needs rise to the top.

50/50 prospects
Rank↑PlayerPosTierCollegePos needModel rankFitWhy he fits
1
Kyle Hamiltonblend#9$7M
S1st Round· Notre Dame· model #9
S1st RoundNotre Damelow need#90.85A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board says top-15 talent.
2
Daxton Hillblend#17$5M
CB1st Round· Michigan· model #17
CB1st RoundMichiganlow need#170.79A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a first-rounder.
3
Evan Nealblend#1$12M
OLBlue Chip· Alabama· model #1
OLBlue ChipAlabamalow need#10.78A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board says top-15 talent.
4
Trent McDuffieblend#20$4M
CB1st Round· Washington· model #20
CB1st RoundWashingtonlow need#200.78A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a first-rounder.
5
Ikem Ekwonublend#2$12M
OTBlue Chip· North Carolina St.· model #2
OTBlue ChipNorth Carolina St.low need#20.77A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board says top-15 talent.
6
Zion Johnsonblend#3$11M
GBlue Chip· Boston Col.· model #3
GBlue ChipBoston Col.low need#30.77A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board says top-15 talent.
7
Sauce Gardnerblend#21$4M
CB1st Round· Cincinnati· model #21
CB1st RoundCincinnatilow need#210.77A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a first-rounder.
8
Derek Stingley Jr.blend#22$4M
CB1st Round· LSU· model #22
CB1st RoundLSUlow need#220.76A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a first-rounder.
9
Lewis Cineblend#23$4M
CB1st Round· Georgia· model #23
CB1st RoundGeorgialow need#230.75A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a first-rounder.
10
Garrett Wilsonblend#5$9M
WRBlue Chip· Ohio St.· model #5
WRBlue ChipOhio St.low need#50.74A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board says top-15 talent.
11
Breece Hallblend#6$8M
RBBlue Chip· Iowa St.· model #6
RBBlue ChipIowa St.low need#60.74A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board says top-15 talent.
12
Tyler Smith
OL1st Round· Tulsa· model #10
OL1st RoundTulsalow need#100.74A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board says top-15 talent.
13
Jalen Pitreblend#28$4M
S1st Round· Baylor· model #28
S1st RoundBaylorlow need#280.73A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a first-rounder.
14
Jameson Williamsblend#7$8M
WR1st Round· Alabama· model #7
WR1st RoundAlabamalow need#70.73A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board says top-15 talent.
15
Tyler Linderbaumblend#11$6M
OL1st Round· Iowa· model #11
OL1st RoundIowalow need#110.72A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board says top-15 talent.
16
Charles Crossblend#12$6M
OL1st Round· Mississippi St.· model #12
OL1st RoundMississippi St.low need#120.72A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board says top-15 talent.
17
Kaiir Elamblend#41$3M
CBDay 2· Florida· model #41
CBDay 2Floridalow need#410.68A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player.
18
Trevor Penningblend#15$5M
OT1st Round· Northern Iowa· model #15
OT1st RoundNorthern Iowalow need#150.68A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board says top-15 talent.
19
Andrew Boothblend#45$3M
CBDay 2· Clemson· model #45
CBDay 2Clemsonlow need#450.68A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player.
20
Treylon Burksblend#14$6M
WR1st Round· Arkansas· model #14
WR1st RoundArkansaslow need#140.68A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board says top-15 talent.
21
Kenny Pickettblend#30
QB1st Round· Pittsburgh· model #30
QB1st RoundPittsburghlow need#300.67A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a first-rounder.
22
Desmond Ridderblend#31
QB1st Round· Cincinnati· model #31
QB1st RoundCincinnatilow need#310.67A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a first-rounder.
23
Sam Howell
QB1st Round· North Carolina· model #32
QB1st RoundNorth Carolinalow need#320.67A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a first-rounder.
24
Drake Londonblend#16$5M
WR1st Round· USC· model #16
WR1st RoundUSClow need#160.67A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a first-rounder.
25
Bernhard Raimann
OL1st Round· Central Michigan· model #19
OL1st RoundCentral Michiganlow need#190.67A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a first-rounder.
26
Malik Willisblend#33
QBDay 2· Liberty· model #33
QBDay 2Libertylow need#330.67A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player.
27
Kyler Gordonblend#49$2M
CBDay 2· Washington· model #49
CBDay 2Washingtonlow need#490.66A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player.
28
Roger McCrearyblend#52$2M
CBDay 2· Auburn· model #52
CBDay 2Auburnlow need#520.66A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player.
29
Aidan Hutchinsonblend#4$10M
EDGEBlue Chip· Michigan· model #4
EDGEBlue ChipMichiganlow need#40.64A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board says top-15 talent.
30
Jaquan Briskerblend#58$2M
SDay 2· Penn St.· model #58
SDay 2Penn St.low need#580.63A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player.
31
Kenyon Green
OL1st Round· Texas A&M· model #27
OL1st RoundTexas A&Mlow need#270.63A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a first-rounder.
32
Kayvon Thibodeauxblend#8$7M
EDGE1st Round· Oregon· model #8
EDGE1st RoundOregonlow need#80.62A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board says top-15 talent.
33
Kenneth Walker IIIblend#29$4M
RB1st Round· Michigan St.· model #29
RB1st RoundMichigan St.low need#290.61A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a first-rounder.
34
Marcus Jones
CBDay 2· Houston· model #68
CBDay 2Houstonlow need#680.60A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player.
35
Sean Rhyan
OLDay 2· UCLA· model #36
OLDay 2UCLAlow need#360.59A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player.
36
Jahan Dotsonblend#35$3M
WRDay 2· Penn St.· model #35
WRDay 2Penn St.low need#350.59A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player.
37
Martin Emersonblend#75$1M
CBDay 2· Mississippi St.· model #75
CBDay 2Mississippi St.low need#750.57A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player.
38
Zach Tom
OLDay 2· Wake Forest· model #40
OLDay 2Wake Forestlow need#400.57A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player.
39
Abraham Lucasblend#42$3M
OLDay 2· Washington St.· model #42
OLDay 2Washington St.low need#420.57A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player.
40
Devin Lloydblend#13$6M
LB1st Round· Utah· model #13
LB1st RoundUtahlow need#130.57A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board says top-15 talent.
41
Zyon McCollumblend#77$1M
CBDay 2· Sam Houston St.· model #77
CBDay 2Sam Houston St.low need#770.57A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player.
42
Chris Olaveblend#39$3M
WRDay 2· Ohio St.· model #39
WRDay 2Ohio St.low need#390.57A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player.
43
Kerby Joseph
CBDay 2· Illinois· model #80
CBDay 2Illinoislow need#800.56A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player.
44
Luke Goedeke
OLDay 2· Central Michigan· model #47
OLDay 2Central Michiganlow need#470.56A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player.
45
Travis Jones
DT1st Round· Connecticut· model #18
DT1st RoundConnecticutlow need#180.56A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a first-rounder.
46
Elijah Hicks
SDay 2· California· model #82
SDay 2Californialow need#820.56A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player.
47
Skyy Mooreblend#43$3M
WRDay 2· Western Michigan· model #43
WRDay 2Western Michiganlow need#430.56A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player.
48
Trey McBrideblend#44$3M
TEDay 2· Colorado St.· model #44
TEDay 2Colorado St.low need#440.55A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player.
49
Matt Corralblend#61
QBDay 2· Mississippi· model #61
QBDay 2Mississippilow need#610.55A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player.
50
Christian Watsonblend#48$2M
WRDay 2· North Dakota St.· model #48
WRDay 2North Dakota St.low need#480.55A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player.