Draftanomics
  • 2027 board
  • Consensus board
  • 2028 way-too-early
  • Draft news
  • Simulator
  • The house mock
  • Draft order
  • Trade calculator
  • The Scouting Slate
  • Sleepers & reaches
  • Movers & fallers
  • Player comps
  • Dynasty rookie board
  • Track record
  • Past drafts, re-graded
  • Analyst leaderboard
My rankingsAccount
Get the weekly →
Draftanomics

Honest NFL Draft analytics. The model's receipts against actual NFL teams live on the track record.

Boards
  • 2027 board
  • Consensus board
  • Sleepers
Tools
  • Mock draft simulator
  • Plays Like
  • Dynasty rookie board
Track Record
  • Year-by-year results
  • Accountability Index
  • Our board, on the record
  • Past drafts, re-graded
  • Methodology
  • Developers · free API
  • About
Account
  • My board
  • Weekly email
Data + sources
RAS by Kent Lee Platte·Consensus Big Board (Arif Hasan)·nflverse·PFR·CFBD·All sources & credits·Methodology
Career-value model, live
Privacy·Terms·Press ⌘K to search·Draftanomics2026
  1. Draftanomics/
  2. 2022 board/
  3. MIN

MIN

2022 team hubBacktestHaul · A-
Refreshed just now
GM:Rob Brzezinski (interim)new regimehistory →
Scheme:Vertical4-3Match ZoneSpeed Rusher
Picks
10
1st @ #32
Draft capital
15.4
more capital than 53% of teams
Top model fit
Evan Neal
OL · best blend of grade and roster need
Draft haul
A-
Solid value haul (picks averaged 28.2 sp…
🎯Mock as this team
MIN
TeamTeam hub·
ClassMock draft simulator
Target boardDraft capitalHaul gradeSchemeCap outlook

Who MIN should take — each prospect's model grade, weighted up where the roster is thin, so highly graded players at positions MIN needs rise to the top.

50/50 prospects
Rank↑PlayerPosTierCollegePos needModel rankFitWhy he fits
1
Evan Nealrank#1$12.2M
OLBlue Chip· Alabama· model #1
OLBlue ChipAlabamalow need#10.89A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board says top-15 talent.
2
Ikem Ekwonurank#2$11.7M
OTBlue Chip· North Carolina St.· model #2
OTBlue ChipNorth Carolina St.low need#20.88A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board says top-15 talent.
3
Zion Johnsonrank#3$10.5M
GBlue Chip· Boston Col.· model #3
GBlue ChipBoston Col.low need#30.88A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board says top-15 talent.
4
Aidan Hutchinsonrank#4$9.6M
EDGEBlue Chip· Michigan· model #4
EDGEBlue ChipMichiganlow need#40.87A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board says top-15 talent.
5
Garrett Wilsonrank#5$8.7M
WRBlue Chip· Ohio St.· model #5
WRBlue ChipOhio St.low need#50.87A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board says top-15 talent.
6
Breece Hallrank#6$8.2M
RBBlue Chip· Iowa St.· model #6
RBBlue ChipIowa St.low need#60.86A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board says top-15 talent.
7
Jameson Williamsrank#7$7.7M
WR1st Round· Alabama· model #7
WR1st RoundAlabamalow need#70.85A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board says top-15 talent.
8
Kayvon Thibodeauxrank#8$7.1M
EDGE1st Round· Oregon· model #8
EDGE1st RoundOregonlow need#80.85A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board says top-15 talent.
9
Kyle Hamiltonrank#9$6.9M
S1st Round· Notre Dame· model #9
S1st RoundNotre Damelow need#90.85A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board says top-15 talent.
10
Tyler Smith
OL1st Round· Tulsa· model #10
OL1st RoundTulsalow need#100.85A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board says top-15 talent.
11
Tyler Linderbaumrank#11$6.4M
OL1st Round· Iowa· model #11
OL1st RoundIowalow need#110.83A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board says top-15 talent.
12
Charles Crossrank#12$6.1M
OL1st Round· Mississippi St.· model #12
OL1st RoundMississippi St.low need#120.83A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board says top-15 talent.
13
Devin Lloydrank#13$5.8M
LB1st Round· Utah· model #13
LB1st RoundUtahlow need#130.80A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board says top-15 talent.
14
Treylon Burksrank#14$5.5M
WR1st Round· Arkansas· model #14
WR1st RoundArkansaslow need#140.80A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board says top-15 talent.
15
Trevor Penningrank#15$5.2M
OT1st Round· Northern Iowa· model #15
OT1st RoundNorthern Iowalow need#150.80A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board says top-15 talent.
16
Drake Londonrank#16$4.9M
WR1st Round· USC· model #16
WR1st RoundUSClow need#160.79A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a first-rounder.
17
Daxton Hillrank#17$4.7M
CB1st Round· Michigan· model #17
CB1st RoundMichiganlow need#170.79A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a first-rounder.
18
Travis Jones
DT1st Round· Connecticut· model #18
DT1st RoundConnecticutlow need#180.79A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a first-rounder.
19
Bernhard Raimann
OL1st Round· Central Michigan· model #19
OL1st RoundCentral Michiganlow need#190.78A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a first-rounder.
20
Trent McDuffierank#20$4.1M
CB1st Round· Washington· model #20
CB1st RoundWashingtonlow need#200.78A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a first-rounder.
21
Sauce Gardnerrank#21$4M
CB1st Round· Cincinnati· model #21
CB1st RoundCincinnatilow need#210.77A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a first-rounder.
22
Derek Stingley Jr.rank#22$4M
CB1st Round· LSU· model #22
CB1st RoundLSUlow need#220.76A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a first-rounder.
23
Lewis Cinerank#23$3.9M
CB1st Round· Georgia· model #23
CB1st RoundGeorgialow need#230.75A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a first-rounder.
24
Jordan Davisrank#24$3.9M
DT1st Round· Georgia· model #24
DT1st RoundGeorgialow need#240.75A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a first-rounder.
25
Nakobe Dean
LB1st Round· Georgia· model #25
LB1st RoundGeorgialow need#250.75A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a first-rounder.
26
Jermaine Johnson IIrank#26$3.7M
LB1st Round· Florida St.· model #26
LB1st RoundFlorida St.low need#260.74A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a first-rounder.
27
Kenyon Green
OL1st Round· Texas A&M· model #27
OL1st RoundTexas A&Mlow need#270.74A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a first-rounder.
28
Jalen Pitrerank#28$3.6M
S1st Round· Baylor· model #28
S1st RoundBaylorlow need#280.73A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a first-rounder.
29
Kenneth Walker IIIrank#29$3.6M
RB1st Round· Michigan St.· model #29
RB1st RoundMichigan St.low need#290.73A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a first-rounder.
30
Kenny Pickettrank#30
QB1st Round· Pittsburgh· model #30
QB1st RoundPittsburghlow need#300.73A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a first-rounder.
31
Desmond Ridderrank#31
QB1st Round· Cincinnati· model #31
QB1st RoundCincinnatilow need#310.73A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a first-rounder.
32
Sam Howell
QB1st Round· North Carolina· model #32
QB1st RoundNorth Carolinalow need#320.73A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a first-rounder.
33
Malik Willisrank#33
QBDay 2· Liberty· model #33
QBDay 2Libertylow need#330.72A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player.
34
Devonte Wyattrank#34$3.3M
DTDay 2· Georgia· model #34
DTDay 2Georgialow need#340.72A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player.
35
Jahan Dotsonrank#35$3.2M
WRDay 2· Penn St.· model #35
WRDay 2Penn St.low need#350.71A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player.
36
Sean Rhyan
OLDay 2· UCLA· model #36
OLDay 2UCLAlow need#360.71A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player.
37
Travon Walkerrank#37$3.1M
EDGEDay 2· Georgia· model #37
EDGEDay 2Georgialow need#370.70A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player.
38
Leo Chenalrank#38$3M
LBDay 2· Wisconsin· model #38
LBDay 2Wisconsinlow need#380.69A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player.
39
Chris Olaverank#39$2.9M
WRDay 2· Ohio St.· model #39
WRDay 2Ohio St.low need#390.69A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player.
40
Zach Tom
OLDay 2· Wake Forest· model #40
OLDay 2Wake Forestlow need#400.68A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player.
41
Kaiir Elamrank#41$2.8M
CBDay 2· Florida· model #41
CBDay 2Floridalow need#410.68A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player.
42
Abraham Lucasrank#42$2.7M
OLDay 2· Washington St.· model #42
OLDay 2Washington St.low need#420.68A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player.
43
Skyy Moorerank#43$2.7M
WRDay 2· Western Michigan· model #43
WRDay 2Western Michiganlow need#430.68A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player.
44
Trey McBriderank#44$2.6M
TEDay 2· Colorado St.· model #44
TEDay 2Colorado St.low need#440.68A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player.
45
Andrew Boothrank#45$2.5M
CBDay 2· Clemson· model #45
CBDay 2Clemsonlow need#450.67A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player.
46
Arnold Ebiketierank#46$2.5M
EDGEDay 2· Penn St.· model #46
EDGEDay 2Penn St.low need#460.67A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player.
47
Luke Goedeke
OLDay 2· Central Michigan· model #47
OLDay 2Central Michiganlow need#470.67A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player.
48
Christian Watsonrank#48$2.3M
WRDay 2· North Dakota St.· model #48
WRDay 2North Dakota St.low need#480.67A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player.
49
Kyler Gordonrank#49$2.3M
CBDay 2· Washington· model #49
CBDay 2Washingtonlow need#490.66A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player.
50
Luke Fortner
GDay 2· Kentucky· model #50
GDay 2Kentuckylow need#500.66A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player.