Skip to main content
Prospect dossier

Jadan Baugh

RB · Florida · 2027 NFL Draft class

Public Draft Board rank #20·26 contributing sources·Board as of August 31, 2026
Draftanomics scouting
Revised preseason edition · September 12, 20264 min readReport role: RB · Florida

Master scouting report

Baugh can move the point of contact before he delivers the force. His quick feet give a large back a way to change the defender’s approach, and his balance helps him continue once the tackle arrives. The challenge is knowing when another adjustment helps and when it delays the run.

01A workload with several forms

Florida records 673 rushing yards and seven rushing touchdowns in Baugh’s freshman season, when he appeared in all 13 games and made four starts. He also served as the primary kick returner. In 2025 he started all 12 games, carrying 220 times for 1,170 yards and eight rushing touchdowns. That progression establishes meaningful experience with an expanding workload. His 38 carries for 266 yards and two touchdowns against Florida State provide a distinct example of sustained involvement. The season also included a larger receiving role. Those different responsibilities matter more to the role assessment than treating one impressive rushing game as the entire case.

02Create a better collision

Charlie Campbell credits downhill power, a stiff-arm and contact balance that keeps Baugh moving through attempted tackles. He also describes patience in setting up blocks and a jump cut that precedes acceleration into the opening. The sequence matters: the cut can change where contact happens, allowing the strength to finish a run from a more favorable position. The Devy Dojo likewise emphasizes light feet and the difficulty of getting a clean hold on him. Baugh’s size does not require every carry to become a direct collision. Making the defender hesitate can let him reach the contact with more of his own momentum still available.

03When patience stops helping

The same Dojo evaluation criticizes excessive dancing before committing upfield. That is the tension within the foot quickness: another move can avoid a defender, but it can also consume the time in which a usable lane exists. The improvement is more decisive selection of an opening, without removing the adjustment that makes him difficult to square up. Campbell’s positive account of block setup supplies the other side. Waiting can be productive when it lets the blocking develop; the decision should be judged by whether it creates access to the lane. Patience and hesitation can look similar at the start and produce very different finishes.

04A receiving role worth preserving

Campbell credits fluid routes, soft hands and catches made while moving. That combination supports using Baugh beyond a stationary outlet. It also leaves protection as a separate evaluation: the ability to catch does not settle every passing-down assignment, and general preparation for pro protection responsibilities should not be mistaken for a documented college protection failure.

05An additional way to use the athlete

In Florida’s April 3 account, Baugh was taking wildcat snaps in Buster Faulkner’s offense after earlier quarterback experience in high school. That is a specific practice experiment, rather than proof of an established game package. It shows the new staff considering another way to put the ball in his hands. Eric Singleton Jr. described the combination of power and a decisive cut into acceleration. That teammate assessment fits the deployment question: how often can the offense get Baugh moving toward useful space, with the chance to turn his strength into forward progress? The practice account adds an option to investigate without requiring a forecast about how often it will be called.

The case for the player

Strengths

  • He can continue the run after the first attempted tackle.

  • His sophomore season brought a full starting workload.

The questions that remain

Concerns

  • Too many adjustments can let the running opportunity close.

  • Receiving skill does not establish readiness for every protection assignment.

Building the fit

NFL role and scheme fit

Build around a runner with experience carrying the rushing workload and contributing in other phases. Florida’s two-season record supports meaningful involvement, with each passing-down responsibility evaluated on its own demands.

The Draftanomics view

Bottom line

Jon Sumrall described Baugh as willing and coachable in April. That is an encouraging coaching account for a back whose next gains can come from sharper decisions as well as physical production.

Sources & edition

The Draftanomics assessment, synthesized from attributed reporting. Role and development language expresses scouting opinion.

Preseason synthesis of published evaluations and official college records, reviewed September 12, 2026. This edition does not assess 2026 game film.

Edition reviewed September 12, 2026. Replaces fragmented sections with connected technical analysis, explicit evaluator disagreements and a defined role assessment.

The original August edition remains preserved. This is a revised Draftanomics assessment, with supporting sources attached to each statement.

View the 4 referenced sources
Read statement references

Every passage remains linked to its supporting sources. Open a section to inspect the assessment and its evidence.

Sources for overview
  1. House assessment

    Baugh can move the point of contact before he delivers the force. His quick feet give a large back a way to change the defender’s approach, and his balance helps him continue once the tackle arrives. The challenge is knowing when another adjustment helps and when it delays the run.

Sources for a workload with several forms
  1. House assessment

    Florida records 673 rushing yards and seven rushing touchdowns in Baugh’s freshman season, when he appeared in all 13 games and made four starts. He also served as the primary kick returner. In 2025 he started all 12 games, carrying 220 times for 1,170 yards and eight rushing touchdowns. That progression establishes meaningful experience with an expanding workload.

  2. House assessment

    His 38 carries for 266 yards and two touchdowns against Florida State provide a distinct example of sustained involvement. The season also included a larger receiving role. Those different responsibilities matter more to the role assessment than treating one impressive rushing game as the entire case.

Sources for create a better collision
  1. House assessment

    Charlie Campbell credits downhill power, a stiff-arm and contact balance that keeps Baugh moving through attempted tackles. He also describes patience in setting up blocks and a jump cut that precedes acceleration into the opening. The sequence matters: the cut can change where contact happens, allowing the strength to finish a run from a more favorable position.

  2. House assessment

    The Devy Dojo likewise emphasizes light feet and the difficulty of getting a clean hold on him. Baugh’s size does not require every carry to become a direct collision. Making the defender hesitate can let him reach the contact with more of his own momentum still available.

Sources for when patience stops helping
  1. House assessment

    The same Dojo evaluation criticizes excessive dancing before committing upfield. That is the tension within the foot quickness: another move can avoid a defender, but it can also consume the time in which a usable lane exists. The improvement is more decisive selection of an opening, without removing the adjustment that makes him difficult to square up.

  2. House assessment

    Campbell’s positive account of block setup supplies the other side. Waiting can be productive when it lets the blocking develop; the decision should be judged by whether it creates access to the lane. Patience and hesitation can look similar at the start and produce very different finishes.

Sources for a receiving role worth preserving
  1. House assessment

    Campbell credits fluid routes, soft hands and catches made while moving. That combination supports using Baugh beyond a stationary outlet. It also leaves protection as a separate evaluation: the ability to catch does not settle every passing-down assignment, and general preparation for pro protection responsibilities should not be mistaken for a documented college protection failure.

Sources for an additional way to use the athlete
  1. House assessment

    In Florida’s April 3 account, Baugh was taking wildcat snaps in Buster Faulkner’s offense after earlier quarterback experience in high school. That is a specific practice experiment, rather than proof of an established game package. It shows the new staff considering another way to put the ball in his hands.

  2. House assessment

    Eric Singleton Jr. described the combination of power and a decisive cut into acceleration. That teammate assessment fits the deployment question: how often can the offense get Baugh moving toward useful space, with the chance to turn his strength into forward progress? The practice account adds an option to investigate without requiring a forecast about how often it will be called.

Sources for contact balance
  1. House assessment

    He can continue the run after the first attempted tackle.

Sources for experience carrying responsibility
  1. House assessment

    His sophomore season brought a full starting workload.

Sources for decision tempo
  1. House assessment

    Too many adjustments can let the running opportunity close.

Sources for passing-down completeness
  1. House assessment

    Receiving skill does not establish readiness for every protection assignment.

Sources for role and deployment
  1. House assessment

    Build around a runner with experience carrying the rushing workload and contributing in other phases. Florida’s two-season record supports meaningful involvement, with each passing-down responsibility evaluated on its own demands.

Sources for the decision
  1. House assessment

    Jon Sumrall described Baugh as willing and coachable in April. That is an encouraging coaching account for a back whose next gains can come from sharper decisions as well as physical production.

College record & draft context

College production, measurables, experience, and the prospect's place on the sealed Public Draft Board.

Public Draft Board

Public Draft Board rank
#20
Position rank
RB2
Contributing sources
26
Movement since prior snapshot
Up 18

Sealed snapshot as of August 31, 2026 · equal-weight aggregation of public boards, minimum 3 sources for a rank · The Public Draft Board

College production

Receiving
StatisticSeason 2024Season 2025
Receptions433
Receiving yards33210
Yards per reception8.36.4
Receiving TD12
Long2533
Rushing
StatisticSeason 2024Season 2025
Carries133220
Rushing yards6731170
Yards per carry5.15.3
Rushing TD78
Long5526

Seasons of evidence: 2. Games played, snap counts, and usage shares are not in the retained data. An em dash means the value is not in the dataset, not zero.

Evidence notes

  • The retained data contains 2 seasons of receiving, rushing production (2024–2025).
  • Receiving yards increased in each observed season (33 → 210).
  • The newest college season in the retained data is 2025; the 2026 season is not yet included.
  • No verified athletic testing is included in the sealed dataset for this prospect.
  • 26 contributing public boards rank this prospect; the Public Draft Board places him at #20.
  • The aggregate public rank rose 18 spots between the two most recent sealed weekly snapshots.

Each note restates a displayed fact. None is a forecast of NFL performance.

Experience and measurements

Listed height
6'1"
Listed weight
225 lb
Class
Junior
Age
Not in dataset
Recorded school
Florida
Former school
Not in dataset
Hometown
Atlanta, GA
Jersey
#13
Recruiting stars
4-star
Recruiting rank
#381 nationally

"Not in dataset" means the value is absent from the sealed dossier dataset, not that it does not exist.

Athletic testing

Not included in the sealed dataset. No combine, pro-day, or RAS value is retained for the 2027 class; absence here does not mean no testing has taken place.

Listed roster height and weight (CollegeFootballData); no verified athletic testing is retained. Bio captured August 29, 2026.

Historical comparisons

Historical profile comparisons are being rebuilt.

Sources and methodology

  • Retained bio and measurements: Draftanomics prospect ingest (CollegeFootballData rosters and recruiting), retained seed data/seed/prospects_upcoming_full.parquet.
  • Retained college production: CollegeFootballData season statistics via the retained player cross-reference; position-relevant categories only; all-zero category rows dropped.
  • Age: unavailable — no birth date or age is retained for the 2027 class.
  • Transfer history: not retained — the page shows the current school and, where the frozen id names a different school, the former school.
  • Public Draft Board: sealed snapshot as of August 31, 2026; per-source ranks are not published under the aggregate-only source policy.

Board methodologyDossier methodologyResearch status

Board position reflects aggregated public opinion; the scouting report is a separate editorial assessment.