Draftanomics
  • 2027 board
  • Consensus board
  • 2028 way-too-early
  • Draft news
  • Simulator
  • The house mock
  • Draft order
  • Trade calculator
  • The Scouting Slate
  • Sleepers & reaches
  • Movers & fallers
  • Player comps
  • Dynasty rookie board
  • Track record
  • Past drafts, re-graded
  • Analyst leaderboard
My rankingsAccountFounders’ rate
Founders’ rate →
Draftanomics

Honest NFL Draft analytics. The model's receipts against actual NFL teams live on the track record.

Boards
  • 2027 board
  • Consensus board
  • Sleepers
Tools
  • Mock draft simulator
  • Plays Like
  • Dynasty rookie board
Track Record
  • Year-by-year results
  • Accountability Index
  • Our board, on the record
  • Past drafts, re-graded
  • Methodology
  • Developers · free API
  • About
Account
  • My board
  • Premium
Data + sources
RAS by Kent Lee Platte·Consensus Big Board (Arif Hasan)·nflverse·PFR·CFBD·All sources & credits·Methodology
Career-value model, live
Privacy·Terms·Press ⌘K to search·Draftanomics2026
  1. Draftanomics/
  2. 2027 board/
  3. ARI

ARI

2027 team hub
Refreshed just now
GM:Monti Ossenforthistory →
Scheme:SpreadHybridMatch ZoneHybrid
Picks
7
1st @ #2
Draft capital
39.6
more capital than 97% of teams
Top model fit
Trevor Goosby
OT · best blend of grade and roster need
🎯Mock as this team
ARI
TeamTeam hub·
ClassMock draft simulator
Target boardDraft capitalHaul gradeSchemeCap outlook
ARI's biggest positional needs
Offensive linecritical need
top fit: Trevor Goosby (OT)
QBcritical need
top fit: Dante Moore (QB)
EDGE / DL / LBdepth need
top fit: Colin Simmons (EDGE)

Who ARIshould take — each prospect's model grade, weighted up where the roster is thin, so highly graded players at positions ARI needs rise to the top.

50/50 prospects
Rank↑PlayerPosTierCollegePos needModel rankFitWhy he fits
1
Trevor Goosbyblend#3$12M
OTBlue Chip· Texas· model #3· critical need
OTBlue ChipTexascritical need#30.87Fills one of the biggest holes on the roster; the board says top-15 talent.
2
Jordan Seatonblend#5$10M
OTBlue Chip· LSU· model #5· critical need
OTBlue ChipLSUcritical need#50.86Fills one of the biggest holes on the roster; the board says top-15 talent.
3
Dante Mooreblend#7
QB1st Round· Oregon· model #7· critical need
QB1st RoundOregoncritical need#70.84Fills one of the biggest holes on the roster; the board says top-15 talent.
4
Colin Simmonsblend#4$11M
EDGEBlue Chip· Texas· model #4
EDGEBlue ChipTexasdepth need#40.81Adds depth where the roster is thin; the board says top-15 talent.
5
Arch Manningblend#11
QB1st Round· Texas· model #11· critical need
QB1st RoundTexascritical need#110.79Fills one of the biggest holes on the roster; the board says top-15 talent.
6
Leonard Mooreblend#2$13M
CBBlue Chip· Notre Dame· model #2
CBBlue ChipNotre Damelow need#20.79A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board says top-15 talent.
7
KJ Boldenblend#8$8M
S1st Round· Georgia· model #8
S1st RoundGeorgialow need#80.76A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board says top-15 talent.
8
Cayden Greenblend#13$7M
OT1st Round· Missouri· model #13· critical need
OT1st RoundMissouricritical need#130.76Fills one of the biggest holes on the roster; the board says top-15 talent.
9
William Echolesblend#9$8M
DL1st Round· Ole Miss· model #9
DL1st RoundOle Missdepth need#90.76Adds depth where the roster is thin; the board says top-15 talent.
10
Trevor Lauck
OT1st Round· Iowa· model #16· critical need
OT1st RoundIowacritical need#160.74Fills one of the biggest holes on the roster; the board sees a first-rounder.
11
Julian Sayinblend#14
QB1st Round· Ohio State· model #14· critical need
QB1st RoundOhio Statecritical need#140.74Fills one of the biggest holes on the roster; the board says top-15 talent.
12
Kyngstonn Viliamu-Asablend#12$7M
LB1st Round· Notre Dame· model #12
LB1st RoundNotre Damedepth need#120.73Adds depth where the roster is thin; the board says top-15 talent.
13
Austin Siereveld
G1st Round· Ohio State· model #20· critical need
G1st RoundOhio Statecritical need#200.73Fills one of the biggest holes on the roster; the board sees a first-rounder.
14
Jeremiah Smithblend#1$14M
WRBlue Chip· Ohio State· model #1
WRBlue ChipOhio Statelow need#10.71A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board says top-15 talent.
15
Cam Colemanblend#6$9M
WRBlue Chip· Texas· model #6
WRBlue ChipTexaslow need#60.68A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board says top-15 talent.
16
LaNorris Sellersblend#29
QB1st Round· South Carolina· model #29· critical need
QB1st RoundSouth Carolinacritical need#290.68Fills one of the biggest holes on the roster; the board sees a first-rounder.
17
Kade Pieper
DL1st Round· Iowa· model #18
DL1st RoundIowadepth need#180.67Adds depth where the roster is thin; the board sees a first-rounder.
18
David Stoneblend#19$5M
DL1st Round· Oklahoma· model #19
DL1st RoundOklahomadepth need#190.67Adds depth where the roster is thin; the board sees a first-rounder.
19
Dylan Stewartblend#24$4M
EDGE1st Round· South Carolina· model #24
EDGE1st RoundSouth Carolinadepth need#240.66Adds depth where the roster is thin; the board sees a first-rounder.
20
Rasheem Bilesblend#15$6M
ATH1st Round· Texas· model #15
ATH1st RoundTexaslow need#150.65A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board says top-15 talent.
21
Sam Leavitt
QBDay 2· LSU· model #37· critical need
QBDay 2LSUcritical need#370.64Fills one of the biggest holes on the roster; the board sees a top-100 player.
22
A'Mauri Washingtonblend#27$4M
DL1st Round· Oregon· model #27
DL1st RoundOregondepth need#270.64Adds depth where the roster is thin; the board sees a first-rounder.
23
Koi Perich
S1st Round· Oregon· model #22
S1st RoundOregonlow need#220.64A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a first-rounder.
24
Jamari Johnsonblend#21$5M
ATH1st Round· Oregon· model #21
ATH1st RoundOregonlow need#210.64A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a first-rounder.
25
Ryan Williamsblend#10$8M
WR1st Round· Alabama· model #10
WR1st RoundAlabamalow need#100.63A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board says top-15 talent.
26
Jadan Baughblend#23$4M
ATH1st Round· Florida· model #23
ATH1st RoundFloridalow need#230.63A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a first-rounder.
27
Adam Trickblend#30$4M
LB1st Round· Texas Tech· model #30
LB1st RoundTexas Techdepth need#300.63Adds depth where the roster is thin; the board sees a first-rounder.
28
OJ Frederique Jr.
CB1st Round· Miami· model #25
CB1st RoundMiamilow need#250.62A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a first-rounder.
29
Xavier Scott
CB1st Round· Illinois· model #26
CB1st RoundIllinoislow need#260.62A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a first-rounder.
30
Quincy Rhodes Jr.blend#31$4M
DL1st Round· Arkansas· model #31
DL1st RoundArkansasdepth need#310.61Adds depth where the roster is thin; the board sees a first-rounder.
31
Sammy Brownblend#34$4M
LBDay 2· Clemson· model #34
LBDay 2Clemsondepth need#340.61Adds depth where the roster is thin; the board sees a top-100 player.
32
Darian Mensahblend#47
QBDay 2· Miami· model #47· critical need
QBDay 2Miamicritical need#470.61Fills one of the biggest holes on the roster; the board sees a top-100 player.
33
Ian Moore
GDay 2· Ohio State· model #56· critical need
GDay 2Ohio Statecritical need#560.60Fills one of the biggest holes on the roster; the board sees a top-100 player.
34
Ellis Robinson IVblend#32$4M
CB1st Round· Georgia· model #32
CB1st RoundGeorgialow need#320.59A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a first-rounder.
35
CJ Carr
QBDay 2· Notre Dame· model #57· critical need
QBDay 2Notre Damecritical need#570.58Fills one of the biggest holes on the roster; the board sees a top-100 player.
36
Iapani Laloulu
GDay 2· Oregon· model #64· critical need
GDay 2Oregoncritical need#640.58Fills one of the biggest holes on the roster; the board sees a top-100 player.
37
Ethan Wesloskiblend#40$3M
LBDay 2· Oklahoma State· model #40
LBDay 2Oklahoma Statedepth need#400.58Adds depth where the roster is thin; the board sees a top-100 player.
38
Samson Okunlola
OTDay 2· Miami· model #67· critical need
OTDay 2Miamicritical need#670.58Fills one of the biggest holes on the roster; the board sees a top-100 player.
39
PJ Williams
OTDay 2· SMU· model #70· critical need
OTDay 2SMUcritical need#700.58Fills one of the biggest holes on the roster; the board sees a top-100 player.
40
Jacarrius Peak
GDay 2· South Carolina· model #72· critical need
GDay 2South Carolinacritical need#720.58Fills one of the biggest holes on the roster; the board sees a top-100 player.
41
Tony Rojas
LBDay 2· Penn State· model #42
LBDay 2Penn Statedepth need#420.57Adds depth where the roster is thin; the board sees a top-100 player.
42
Brandon Baker
OTDay 2· Texas· model #83· critical need
OTDay 2Texascritical need#830.57Fills one of the biggest holes on the roster; the board sees a top-100 player.
43
Wyatt Youngblend#38$3M
ATHDay 2· Oklahoma State· model #38
ATHDay 2Oklahoma Statelow need#380.56A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player.
44
Nico Iamaleavablend#76
QBDay 2· UCLA· model #76· critical need
QBDay 2UCLAcritical need#760.56Fills one of the biggest holes on the roster; the board sees a top-100 player.
45
Kewan Lacyblend#17$5M
RB1st Round· Ole Miss· model #17
RB1st RoundOle Misslow need#170.56A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a first-rounder.
46
Chris Cole
LBDay 2· Georgia· model #48
LBDay 2Georgiadepth need#480.56Adds depth where the roster is thin; the board sees a top-100 player.
47
Bray Hubbard
ATHDay 2· Alabama· model #39
ATHDay 2Alabamalow need#390.55A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player.
48
Boubacar Traoreblend#50$2M
DLDay 2· Notre Dame· model #50
DLDay 2Notre Damedepth need#500.55Adds depth where the roster is thin; the board sees a top-100 player.
49
Jelani McDonald
ATHDay 2· Texas· model #41
ATHDay 2Texaslow need#410.55A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player.
50
Suntarine Perkins
LBDay 2· Ole Miss· model #51
LBDay 2Ole Missdepth need#510.55Adds depth where the roster is thin; the board sees a top-100 player.
The read · Aug 2

Arizona's Needs Say Line. The Model Says Smith.

Cardinals' board reads specialist, offensive line, quarterback — yet both model and house mock still send them Jeremiah Smith at 1. No team need cracks a unanimous WR1. If Arizona actually pivots to the trenches, Trevor Goosby is sitting right there: he's 3rd on the model, 9th in the room, a six-spot gap nobody in the building seems to trust yet. That's the real decision at 1 — take the object of consensus, or bet on a tackle the room hasn't caught up to.

Written by our models from the live board; every name and number checked