Draftanomics
  • 2027 board
  • Consensus board
  • 2028 way-too-early
  • Draft news
  • Simulator
  • The house mock
  • Draft order
  • Trade calculator
  • The Scouting Slate
  • Sleepers & reaches
  • Movers & fallers
  • Player comps
  • Dynasty rookie board
  • Track record
  • Past drafts, re-graded
  • Analyst leaderboard
My rankingsAccountFounders’ rate
Founders’ rate →
Draftanomics

Honest NFL Draft analytics. The model's receipts against actual NFL teams live on the track record.

Boards
  • 2027 board
  • Consensus board
  • Sleepers
Tools
  • Mock draft simulator
  • Plays Like
  • Dynasty rookie board
Track Record
  • Year-by-year results
  • Accountability Index
  • Our board, on the record
  • Past drafts, re-graded
  • Methodology
  • Developers · free API
  • About
Account
  • My board
  • Premium
Data + sources
RAS by Kent Lee Platte·Consensus Big Board (Arif Hasan)·nflverse·PFR·CFBD·All sources & credits·Methodology
Career-value model, live
Privacy·Terms·Press ⌘K to search·Draftanomics2026
  1. Draftanomics/
  2. 2027 board/
  3. SF

SF

2027 team hub
Refreshed just now
GM:John Lynchhistory →
Scheme:West Coast4-3Match ZoneSpeed Rusher
Picks
7
1st @ #25
Draft capital
11.6
more capital than 25% of teams
Top model fit
Colin Simmons
EDGE · best blend of grade and roster need
🎯Mock as this team
SF
TeamTeam hub·
ClassMock draft simulator
Target boardDraft capitalHaul gradeSchemeCap outlook
SF's biggest positional needs
EDGE / DL / LBcritical need
top fit: Colin Simmons (EDGE)
Offensive linecritical need
top fit: Trevor Goosby (OT)
CB / Scritical need
top fit: Leonard Moore (CB)

Who SFshould take — each prospect's model grade, weighted up where the roster is thin, so highly graded players at positions SF needs rise to the top.

50/50 prospects
Rank↑PlayerPosTierCollegePos needModel rankFitWhy he fits
1
Colin Simmonsblend#4$11M
EDGEBlue Chip· Texas· model #4· critical need
EDGEBlue ChipTexascritical need#40.93Fills one of the biggest holes on the roster; the board says top-15 talent.
2
Trevor Goosbyblend#3$12M
OTBlue Chip· Texas· model #3· critical need
OTBlue ChipTexascritical need#30.89Fills one of the biggest holes on the roster; the board says top-15 talent.
3
Jordan Seatonblend#5$10M
OTBlue Chip· LSU· model #5· critical need
OTBlue ChipLSUcritical need#50.88Fills one of the biggest holes on the roster; the board says top-15 talent.
4
William Echolesblend#9$8M
DL1st Round· Ole Miss· model #9· critical need
DL1st RoundOle Misscritical need#90.88Fills one of the biggest holes on the roster; the board says top-15 talent.
5
Leonard Mooreblend#2$13M
CBBlue Chip· Notre Dame· model #2· critical need
CBBlue ChipNotre Damecritical need#20.86Fills one of the biggest holes on the roster; the board says top-15 talent.
6
Kyngstonn Viliamu-Asablend#12$7M
LB1st Round· Notre Dame· model #12· critical need
LB1st RoundNotre Damecritical need#120.85Fills one of the biggest holes on the roster; the board says top-15 talent.
7
KJ Boldenblend#8$8M
S1st Round· Georgia· model #8· critical need
S1st RoundGeorgiacritical need#80.83Fills one of the biggest holes on the roster; the board says top-15 talent.
8
Jeremiah Smithblend#1$14M
WRBlue Chip· Ohio State· model #1
WRBlue ChipOhio Statelow need#10.80A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board says top-15 talent.
9
Kade Pieper
DL1st Round· Iowa· model #18· critical need
DL1st RoundIowacritical need#180.79Fills one of the biggest holes on the roster; the board sees a first-rounder.
10
David Stoneblend#19$5M
DL1st Round· Oklahoma· model #19· critical need
DL1st RoundOklahomacritical need#190.79Fills one of the biggest holes on the roster; the board sees a first-rounder.
11
Cayden Greenblend#13$7M
OT1st Round· Missouri· model #13· critical need
OT1st RoundMissouricritical need#130.78Fills one of the biggest holes on the roster; the board says top-15 talent.
12
Dylan Stewartblend#24$4M
EDGE1st Round· South Carolina· model #24· critical need
EDGE1st RoundSouth Carolinacritical need#240.78Fills one of the biggest holes on the roster; the board sees a first-rounder.
13
Cam Colemanblend#6$9M
WRBlue Chip· Texas· model #6
WRBlue ChipTexaslow need#60.77A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board says top-15 talent.
14
Dante Mooreblend#7
QB1st Round· Oregon· model #7
QB1st RoundOregonlow need#70.76A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board says top-15 talent.
15
A'Mauri Washingtonblend#27$4M
DL1st Round· Oregon· model #27· critical need
DL1st RoundOregoncritical need#270.76Fills one of the biggest holes on the roster; the board sees a first-rounder.
16
Trevor Lauck
OT1st Round· Iowa· model #16· critical need
OT1st RoundIowacritical need#160.76Fills one of the biggest holes on the roster; the board sees a first-rounder.
17
Adam Trickblend#30$4M
LB1st Round· Texas Tech· model #30· critical need
LB1st RoundTexas Techcritical need#300.75Fills one of the biggest holes on the roster; the board sees a first-rounder.
18
Austin Siereveld
G1st Round· Ohio State· model #20· critical need
G1st RoundOhio Statecritical need#200.75Fills one of the biggest holes on the roster; the board sees a first-rounder.
19
Quincy Rhodes Jr.blend#31$4M
DL1st Round· Arkansas· model #31· critical need
DL1st RoundArkansascritical need#310.74Fills one of the biggest holes on the roster; the board sees a first-rounder.
20
Ryan Williamsblend#10$8M
WR1st Round· Alabama· model #10
WR1st RoundAlabamalow need#100.73A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board says top-15 talent.
21
Sammy Brownblend#34$4M
LBDay 2· Clemson· model #34· critical need
LBDay 2Clemsoncritical need#340.73Fills one of the biggest holes on the roster; the board sees a top-100 player.
22
Arch Manningblend#11
QB1st Round· Texas· model #11
QB1st RoundTexaslow need#110.72A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board says top-15 talent.
23
Koi Perich
S1st Round· Oregon· model #22· critical need
S1st RoundOregoncritical need#220.71Fills one of the biggest holes on the roster; the board sees a first-rounder.
24
Ethan Wesloskiblend#40$3M
LBDay 2· Oklahoma State· model #40· critical need
LBDay 2Oklahoma Statecritical need#400.70Fills one of the biggest holes on the roster; the board sees a top-100 player.
25
Tony Rojas
LBDay 2· Penn State· model #42· critical need
LBDay 2Penn Statecritical need#420.69Fills one of the biggest holes on the roster; the board sees a top-100 player.
26
OJ Frederique Jr.
CB1st Round· Miami· model #25· critical need
CB1st RoundMiamicritical need#250.69Fills one of the biggest holes on the roster; the board sees a first-rounder.
27
Xavier Scott
CB1st Round· Illinois· model #26· critical need
CB1st RoundIllinoiscritical need#260.69Fills one of the biggest holes on the roster; the board sees a first-rounder.
28
Chris Cole
LBDay 2· Georgia· model #48· critical need
LBDay 2Georgiacritical need#480.68Fills one of the biggest holes on the roster; the board sees a top-100 player.
29
Boubacar Traoreblend#50$2M
DLDay 2· Notre Dame· model #50· critical need
DLDay 2Notre Damecritical need#500.67Fills one of the biggest holes on the roster; the board sees a top-100 player.
30
Suntarine Perkins
LBDay 2· Ole Miss· model #51· critical need
LBDay 2Ole Misscritical need#510.67Fills one of the biggest holes on the roster; the board sees a top-100 player.
31
Damon Wilson IIblend#53$2M
EDGEDay 2· Miami· model #53· critical need
EDGEDay 2Miamicritical need#530.67Fills one of the biggest holes on the roster; the board sees a top-100 player.
32
Maverick Baranowskiblend#55$2M
LBDay 2· Minnesota· model #55· critical need
LBDay 2Minnesotacritical need#550.67Fills one of the biggest holes on the roster; the board sees a top-100 player.
33
Julian Sayinblend#14
QB1st Round· Ohio State· model #14
QB1st RoundOhio Statelow need#140.66A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board says top-15 talent.
34
Will Heldtblend#58$2M
EDGEDay 2· Clemson· model #58· critical need
EDGEDay 2Clemsoncritical need#580.66Fills one of the biggest holes on the roster; the board sees a top-100 player.
35
Ellis Robinson IVblend#32$4M
CB1st Round· Georgia· model #32· critical need
CB1st RoundGeorgiacritical need#320.66Fills one of the biggest holes on the roster; the board sees a first-rounder.
36
Ben Roberts
DLDay 2· Michigan State· model #61· critical need
DLDay 2Michigan Statecritical need#610.66Fills one of the biggest holes on the roster; the board sees a top-100 player.
37
Kewan Lacyblend#17$5M
RB1st Round· Ole Miss· model #17
RB1st RoundOle Misslow need#170.65A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a first-rounder.
38
Rasheem Bilesblend#15$6M
ATH1st Round· Texas· model #15
ATH1st RoundTexaslow need#150.65A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board says top-15 talent.
39
Justin Scottblend#63$2M
DLDay 2· Miami· model #63· critical need
DLDay 2Miamicritical need#630.65Fills one of the biggest holes on the roster; the board sees a top-100 player.
40
Jordan Pollard
LBDay 2· San José State· model #65· critical need
LBDay 2San José Statecritical need#650.64Fills one of the biggest holes on the roster; the board sees a top-100 player.
41
Matayo Uiagalelei
EDGEDay 2· Oregon· model #66· critical need
EDGEDay 2Oregoncritical need#660.64Fills one of the biggest holes on the roster; the board sees a top-100 player.
42
Bear Alexander
DLDay 2· Oregon· model #71· critical need
DLDay 2Oregoncritical need#710.64Fills one of the biggest holes on the roster; the board sees a top-100 player.
43
Kam Robinson
LBDay 2· Virginia· model #73· critical need
LBDay 2Virginiacritical need#730.64Fills one of the biggest holes on the roster; the board sees a top-100 player.
44
Devin Smithblend#74$2M
LBDay 2· Kentucky· model #74· critical need
LBDay 2Kentuckycritical need#740.64Fills one of the biggest holes on the roster; the board sees a top-100 player.
45
Jamari Johnsonblend#21$5M
ATH1st Round· Oregon· model #21
ATH1st RoundOregonlow need#210.64A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a first-rounder.
46
Brandon Smithblend#77$2M
DLDay 2· Western Michigan· model #77· critical need
DLDay 2Western Michigancritical need#770.63Fills one of the biggest holes on the roster; the board sees a top-100 player.
47
C.J. Fite
DLDay 2· Arizona State· model #78· critical need
DLDay 2Arizona Statecritical need#780.63Fills one of the biggest holes on the roster; the board sees a top-100 player.
48
Jadan Baughblend#23$4M
ATH1st Round· Florida· model #23
ATH1st RoundFloridalow need#230.63A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a first-rounder.
49
Jordan Kwiatkowskiblend#84$2M
LBDay 2· Central Michigan· model #84· critical need
LBDay 2Central Michigancritical need#840.63Fills one of the biggest holes on the roster; the board sees a top-100 player.
50
Gabe Peterson
LBDay 2· Houston· model #86· critical need
LBDay 2Houstoncritical need#860.63Fills one of the biggest holes on the roster; the board sees a top-100 player.
The read · Aug 2

SF's Board Says Guard, Its Mock Says Tight End

San Francisco lists defensive front, specialists and offensive line as its top needs, yet the house mock has KJ Duff coming off the board at 26 — a tight end. That leaves Austin Siereveld, the model's 20th-ranked player against a room mark of 49, sitting untouched at the position of greatest need. Xavier Scott's gap is even louder: 26th on the model, 150th in the room, a 124-spot split at a position SF didn't rank as a need. Somewhere between the model and the board, San Francisco's actual priorities got lost.

Written by our models from the live board; every name and number checked