Draftanomics
  • 2027 board
  • Consensus board
  • 2028 way-too-early
  • Draft news
  • Simulator
  • The house mock
  • Draft order
  • Trade calculator
  • The Scouting Slate
  • Sleepers & reaches
  • Movers & fallers
  • Player comps
  • Dynasty rookie board
  • Track record
  • Past drafts, re-graded
  • Analyst leaderboard
My rankingsAccount
Get the weekly →
Draftanomics

Honest NFL Draft analytics. The model's receipts against actual NFL teams live on the track record.

Boards
  • 2027 board
  • Consensus board
  • Sleepers
Tools
  • Mock draft simulator
  • Plays Like
  • Dynasty rookie board
Track Record
  • Year-by-year results
  • Accountability Index
  • Our board, on the record
  • Past drafts, re-graded
  • Methodology
  • Developers · free API
  • About
Account
  • My board
  • Weekly email
Data + sources
RAS by Kent Lee Platte·Consensus Big Board (Arif Hasan)·nflverse·PFR·CFBD·All sources & credits·Methodology
Career-value model, live
Privacy·Terms·Press ⌘K to search·Draftanomics2026
  1. Draftanomics/
  2. 2016 board/
  3. KeiVarae Russell
Refreshed just now
KeiVarae Russell
2016 NFL Draft prospect

KeiVarae Russell

CB·Notre Dame·FBS Independents
age 22.5 · 5'11" · 192 lb

On the live board, bust risk sits at 60% and the realistic range is No. 82 to No. 266.

223rank#223
FBS Independents→ KAN's 2016 class
Print sheet
Backtest: model vs. reality

The model graded KeiVarae Russell at pick #223; he was actually picked #74 by KAN. 2 NFL seasons in, he's barely gotten on the field (grading 1.9 of 20 per season).

KeiVarae RussellCBDraftanomics #223
Print
Dossier
OverviewScouting reportWhy this gradeConsensusProductionRisk2Team fit5Will he be there?Comps0Film & notes

Overview

Headline grade, verdict, and the one-line scout take

Draftanomics Rank
Low conviction
#223CB·Notre Dame

The league moved faster than our board — KAN took him at No. 74, 149 picks ahead of our No. 223 grade. His career is settling that argument now.

Draftanomics's take

Draftanomics had KeiVarae Russell at #223 on draft night — a Day 3 grade — and KAN took him at No. 74, 149 picks earlier than our grade. Bust risk projects at 60% — well above the position median; the model is flagging this as a high-variance pick. The room had him #68 pre-draft; our board sat 155 spots lower.

Written from the live model's numbers — projected to round 7, and it updates whenever the model does. See methodology for what drives the take.

Scouting report

The written report — drafted from the fact sheet, every number traceable, honest about what we can't see yet

Why this grade

Which signals drove the grade up or down — in plain English

Consensus

The analyst room, accuracy-weighted, plus where Draftanomics disagrees with it

Production

Measurables, traits, and college play quality

Risk2

Bust probability, injury history, character flags, pre-mortem

Team fit5

How well this prospect fits each of the 32 team schemes

Will he be there?

Probability he's still on the board at each of your picks

Comps0

Historical players this prospect resembles

Film & notes

Clips, scout notes, voice memos, written reports

Draftanomics Pick?
#223
Day 3range #82–#266 · volatile
Bust Probability?
60%
Beyond the range the model can price precisely — read as 'high risk', not as an exact number.
3.0× CB / S class avg (20%)
well above class avg
Model trust: WEAK
Actual NFL Pick?
#74
KAN · Rd 3
Career Outcome · 2 seasons?
3.7
1.9 / season avg
Career outlook

Career outlook

How this is built →
5-year career arc

Too early to project a career arc.

No public board has ranked this prospect and the model has no production, athletic, or NFL data to anchor on — any percentages here would be noise dressed up as precision. The outlook fills in once boards rank him or real numbers land.

Projected second contract
$3.3M($0M–$10.1M)/yr model
Role player / rotation contract
Bust risk
60%
realistic range 9–73%from a model with a graded track record at this position
Public-board consensus

3 public boards track this prospect. Per-board breakdown loads with the live board.

Pin a team in your account to see how this prospect fits your roster + cap.
Scout note
Private to this device — saved to your browser, never sent to a server.
Empty notes are auto-deleted.
Verdict
MODEL SAVE — we faded, they busted (career avg over 2 seasons)
Gap (actual − predicted)
-149

Film

Highlight reels indexed from YouTube. Loads only when you press play.

The grade is held down by his charted total career snaps, how many boards rank him top-100, and hS recruit rating.

HS recruit rating
-0.03
Scout consensus
-0.01

Model read

Model grade
0.30 of 1
Confidence?
71%
Predicted round
7

The grade is the 0-to-1 score the board sorts by — it only means something next to the rest of this class, which is why the rank above it is the number to quote.

Pulling the boards…
Mock-draft consensus
Pulling the mocks…
4-tier outlook?

Not enough to go on yet — no public board ranks him and there's no production or testing data to anchor a career projection.

Career trajectory + forecast

Solid points = actual NFL snap share per season. Dashed extension = forecast for upcoming years.

0%25%50%75%100%Y1Y2Y3Y4
Actual Forecast (comp-based)
Risk dashboard

Elevated risk — watch the flags

Risk score37· WATCH

Everything that could go wrong with KeiVarae Russell, gathered in one place — the most serious flags listed first.

  • Bust probability60%
    The model gives even odds or worse that this career never gets past role-player level.
  • Predicted-pick range#82–266 · 184-pick spread
    The model's own projections scatter widely for this prospect — the landing spot is genuinely uncertain.
  • Age22.5 yrs
    Within the typical CB draft-age band (~23).
  • Public-board coverage3 sources
    Plenty of public boards have a read — the grade is well corroborated.

Case for / case against

Named, concrete signals — every flag cites numbers, comp players, or schedule context.

Reasons to fade
No risk flags raised.
Reasons to buy
Consensus says higher
high
4 boards have him at mean rank #68; model has him #223 — a 155-spot fade. Analysts converging this much above the model is a tell that the model is undervaluing him.
Mid-major standout
low
School SP+ 22.4 (FBS INDEPENDENTS). Strong program among non-Power-5 — the prospect dominated against decent competition.
Scheme context
Loading…

Teams likely to draft

Based on each team's roster depth at CB / S, age, and recent capital invested.

BLT#1 fit
Need at positionSevereQuality starters0Roster spots short5Recent picks spent hereLittle
ARZ#2 fit
Need at positionSevereQuality starters0Roster spots short5Recent picks spent hereLittle
SL#3 fit
Need at positionSevereQuality starters0Roster spots short5Recent picks spent hereLittle
CLV#4 fit
Need at positionSevereQuality starters0Roster spots short5Recent picks spent hereLittle
HST#5 fit
Need at positionSevereQuality starters0Roster spots short5Recent picks spent hereLittle
Scout reports
Paste in any scouting report you trust; Draftanomics pulls out the concrete claims so you can weigh them against the model on the same page.
Loading…