On the live board, bust risk sits at 12% and the historical draft-day landing band is No. 118 to No. 268.
Daymion Sanford's box score did the talking in 2025 — a jump to 10 TFL and four sacks after a modest three-and-a-half-TFL, one-sack sophomore year, the exact shape of production the model calls 'ascending.' No public board has touched him yet, but the model's career-value system slots him at No. 175 for the 2027 class off that two-year climb alone.
Headline grade, verdict, and the one-line scout take
Both of the model's reads put him in Day-3 / priority-free-agent range. If the public boards are higher, the model is the one doing the fading — check the dossier for what it isn't seeing.
The written report — drafted from the fact sheet, every number traceable, honest about what we can't see yet
Which signals drove the grade up or down — in plain English
The analyst room, accuracy-weighted, plus where Draftanomics disagrees with it
Measurables, traits, and college play quality
Historical players this prospect resembles
Bust probability, injury history, character flags, pre-mortem
How well this prospect fits each of the 32 team schemes
Probability he's still on the board at each of your picks
Clips, scout notes, voice memos, written reports
A Katy, TX native, Sanford arrived at Texas A&M as a four-star recruit — the No. 364 player in his high-school class on the national composite. He enters the season as a senior, listed at 6'2" and 230 pounds, wearing No. 27.
Too early to project a career arc.
No public board has ranked this prospect and the model has no production, athletic, or NFL data to anchor on — any percentages here would be noise dressed up as precision. The outlook fills in once boards rank him or real numbers land.
No public-board coverage yet.
Highlight reels indexed from YouTube. Loads only when you press play.
The displayed grade gets its strongest lift from age and hs recruit rating. Its largest drags are production trajectory and scout consensus.
The grade is the 0-to-1 score the board sorts by — it only means something next to the rest of this class, which is why the rank above it is the number to quote.
Daymion Sanford's box score reads like a breakout in progress: a Texas A&M EDGE at 6-foot-2, 210 pounds, whose sack total went from one to four and whose tackles-for-loss line climbed from 3.5 to 10 between his first two seasons on campus. He sits at No. 175 on the 2027 model board, and no public board has weighed in on him yet.
No sourced scouting observations indexed yet — this read is model-only.
The model's starter projection is real, built off the ascending sack and tackle line, and the bust reading sits at 12 percent (8.8 to 19 percent) — modest risk for the tier. No public board has weighed in yet, so there's no consensus to argue with; this call rides on early production alone, with no testing or school context filled in behind it. Let the price come to you here: the trend is worth tracking, but there isn't enough on file yet to turn it into a buy.
Machine-composed from the statistical record — no scouting sources cover this player yet, so no film claims appear. Every number is machine-checked against the live data before publication. How these reports are written →
Production climbed from 37 total tackles in 2024 to 50 in 2025.
| Season | Team | Games | Tackles | TFL | Sacks | INT | PBU |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Texas A&M | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2024 | Texas A&M | 13 | 37 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| 2025 | Texas A&M | 13 | 50 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 1 |
Counting stats from charted college games. A dash means the stat wasn't recorded that season.
Percentiles are direction-aware — for 40-time / 3-cone / shuttle, lower is faster, so a 95th-percentile mark means faster than 95% of peers. Hover any percentile for the exact peer group and sample size. A missing row means he hasn't posted that measurement.
Everything that could go wrong with Daymion Sanford, gathered in one place — the most serious flags listed first.
Pre-mortem: No material failure modes surface on Daymion Sanford from current data.
No draft-media headlines link here yet — when an outlet we track writes this player up, it lands in this panel automatically.
Roster-based need returns once the 2026 season is played — grading this year’s teams on last year’s depth chart would be guessing. What’s knowable now: the teams holding picks around No. 175, and which of them already spent premium capital at EDGE / DL / LB in the 2026 draft.
Gold means no recent premium investment at EDGE / DL / LB — the cleaner fit on paper. Grey means they already spent one.