Draftanomics has him No. 202; no publishable public-board consensus exists yet.
London Humphreys' production line is boom-or-bust in miniature: 15.3 yards a catch in 2025 and 16.3 in 2024, off just 18 and 15 receptions those two years — a big per-target payoff on a small target sheet. The model's own tiers put him at No. 202 overall with the largest share of any outcome sitting in its elite bucket at 41.7%, but no public board has had a chance to rank him yet.
Headline grade, verdict, and the one-line scout take
Draftanomics has him No. 202; no publishable public-board consensus exists yet.
The written report — drafted from the fact sheet, every number traceable, honest about what we can't see yet
Which signals drove the grade up or down — in plain English
The analyst room, accuracy-weighted, plus where Draftanomics disagrees with it
Measurables, traits, and college play quality
Historical players this prospect resembles
Bust probability, injury history, character flags, pre-mortem
How well this prospect fits each of the 32 team schemes
Probability he's still on the board at each of your picks
Personal notes, voice memos, and sourced report material
A Nashville, TN native, Humphreys arrived at Georgia as a three-star recruit — the No. 487 player in his high-school class on the national composite. He enters the season as a senior, listed at 6'2" and 200 pounds, wearing No. 16.
Too early to project a career arc.
No public board has ranked this prospect and the model has no production, athletic, or NFL data to anchor on — any percentages here would be noise dressed up as precision. The outlook fills in once boards rank him or real numbers land.
No public-board coverage yet.
Highlight reels indexed from YouTube. Loads only when you press play.
Too thin a file for a written report yet.
A report needs at least two of the five kinds of evidence we track; right now the file carries nothing. Still missing: board consensus, college production, athletic testing, age, program context. The profile fills in as testing, season data and board coverage land — we write the report when there's something real to write from.
The displayed grade gets its strongest lift from age and hs recruit rating. Its largest drags are scout consensus and workload share.
The grade is the 0-to-1 score the board sorts by — it only means something next to the rest of this class, which is why the rank above it is the number to quote.
Production dipped from 437 receiving yards in 2023 to 276 in 2025 after transferring from Vanderbilt to Georgia.
| Season | Team | Games | Rec | Yards | TD | Yds/catch |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Vanderbilt | 12 | 21 | 437 | 4 | 20.8 |
| 2024 | Georgia | 13 | 15 | 244 | 2 | 16.3 |
| 2025 | Georgia | 14 | 18 | 276 | 3 | 15.3 |
Counting stats from charted college games. A dash means the stat wasn't recorded that season.
Percentiles are direction-aware — for 40-time / 3-cone / shuttle, lower is faster, so a 95th-percentile mark means faster than 95% of peers. Hover any percentile for the exact peer group and sample size. A missing row means no verified measurement is on file. Recruiting and roster-listed size are labeled as such; neither is a Combine result.
Everything that could go wrong with London Humphreys, gathered in one place — the most serious flags listed first.
Pre-mortem: No material failure modes surface on London Humphreys from current data.
No draft-media headlines link here yet — when an outlet we track writes this player up, it lands in this panel automatically.
Roster-based need returns once the 2026 season is played — grading this year’s teams on last year’s depth chart would be guessing. What’s knowable now: the teams holding picks around No. 202, and which of them already spent premium capital at RB / WR / TE in the 2026 draft.
Gold means no recent premium investment at RB / WR / TE — the cleaner fit on paper. Grey means they already spent one.