On the live board, bust risk sits at 5% and the realistic range is No. 103 to No. 200.
Tawfiq Byard, a Texas A&M safety, put together a 2025 line that reads downhill: 78 tackles, 7.5 tackles for loss and four pass breakups out of the back end is heavy work for a safety. He's built as a single-high safety at 5-foot-11, 190 pounds, and the model's career-value board puts him at No. 34 for 2028 — a number no public big board has matched yet, since nobody else has him listed at all.
Headline grade, verdict, and the one-line scout take
The board slot runs well ahead of our consensus-calibrated read, and no public boards rank him yet to arbitrate. A real range, not a lock.
The written report — drafted from the fact sheet, every number traceable, honest about what we can't see yet
Which signals drove the grade up or down — in plain English
The analyst room, accuracy-weighted, plus where Draftanomics disagrees with it
Measurables, traits, and college play quality
Historical players this prospect resembles
Bust probability, injury history, character flags, pre-mortem
How well this prospect fits each of the 32 team schemes
Probability he's still on the board at each of your picks
Clips, scout notes, voice memos, written reports
A Hyattsville, MD native, Byard arrived at Texas A&M as a three-star recruit. He enters the season as a junior, listed at 6'1" and 195 pounds, wearing No. 4.
Too early to project a career arc.
No public board has ranked this prospect and the model has no production, athletic, or NFL data to anchor on — any percentages here would be noise dressed up as precision. The outlook fills in once boards rank him or real numbers land.
No public-board coverage yet.
Highlight reels indexed from YouTube. Loads only when you press play.
Working in his favor: age. Working against him: how many boards rank him top-100 and conference strength.
The grade is the 0-to-1 score the board sorts by — it only means something next to the rest of this class, which is why the rank above it is the number to quote.
Named, concrete signals — every flag cites numbers, comp players, or schedule context.
No opportunity flags raised.
Roster-based need returns once the 2027 season is played — grading this year’s teams on last year’s depth chart would be guessing. What’s knowable now: the teams holding picks around No. 34, and which of them already spent premium capital at CB / S in the 2027 draft.
Gold means no recent premium investment at CB / S — the cleaner fit on paper. Grey means they already spent one.
No sourced scouting observations indexed yet — this read is model-only.
The model's own tiers lean toward a starter outcome (56.2%) and even flash some elite upside (5%), but the bust number sits at 5%, with a wide band from 21.3% to 60%, and the low-signal flag here is legitimate: one season, zero public boards, three programs in two years. Call this a model-only watchlist name for now — a hold, not a buy, until more of the file fills in.
Written by Draftanomics's models from the statistical record — no scouting sources cover this player yet, so no film claims appear. Every number is machine-checked against the live data before publication. How these reports are written →
We don't have per-season production for this player — typical for specialists and prospects outside the major charting feeds. Stats land here as soon as a season is on record.
Percentiles are direction-aware — for 40-time / 3-cone / shuttle, lower is faster, so a 95th-percentile mark means faster than 95% of peers. Hover any percentile for the exact peer group and sample size. A missing row means he hasn't posted that measurement.
Everything that could go wrong with Tawfiq Byard, gathered in one place — the most serious flags listed first.
Pre-mortem: No material failure modes surface on Tawfiq Byard from current data.
No draft-media headlines link here yet — when an outlet we track writes this player up, it lands in this panel automatically.