On the live board, the historical draft-day landing band is No. 88 to No. 240.
Chico Holt is a blocking-first tight end at Stanford, a 255-pound frame the model's archetype read pegged as an in-line Y with high confidence. The model slots him at No. 225 on the 2027 board, and no public consensus board has picked him up yet.
Headline grade, verdict, and the one-line scout take
Both of the model's reads put him in Day-3 / priority-free-agent range. If the public boards are higher, the model is the one doing the fading — check the dossier for what it isn't seeing.
The written report — drafted from the fact sheet, every number traceable, honest about what we can't see yet
Which signals drove the grade up or down — in plain English
The analyst room, accuracy-weighted, plus where Draftanomics disagrees with it
Measurables, traits, and college play quality
Historical players this prospect resembles
Bust probability, injury history, character flags, pre-mortem
How well this prospect fits each of the 32 team schemes
Probability he's still on the board at each of your picks
Clips, scout notes, voice memos, written reports
A Houston, TX native, Holt arrived at Stanford as a three-star recruit. He enters the season as a junior, listed at 6'5" and 255 pounds, wearing No. 84.
Too early to project a career arc.
No public board has ranked this prospect and the model has no production, athletic, or NFL data to anchor on — any percentages here would be noise dressed up as precision. The outlook fills in once boards rank him or real numbers land.
No publishable bust percentage — the position-level held-out evidence does not clear the publication floor.
No public-board coverage yet.
Highlight reels indexed from YouTube. Loads only when you press play.
The displayed grade gets its strongest lift from age and hs recruit rating. Its largest drags are workload share and scout consensus.
The grade is the 0-to-1 score the board sorts by — it only means something next to the rest of this class, which is why the rank above it is the number to quote.
Too thin a file for a written report yet.
A report needs at least two of the five kinds of evidence we track; right now the file carries nothing. Still missing: board consensus, college production, athletic testing, age, program context. The profile fills in as testing, season data and board coverage land — we write the report when there's something real to write from.
One college season on record — 36 receiving yards at Stanford in 2025.
| Season | Team | Games | Rec | Yards | TD | Yds/catch |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Stanford | 2 | 1 | 36 | 0 | 36 |
Counting stats from charted college games. A dash means the stat wasn't recorded that season.
Percentiles are direction-aware — for 40-time / 3-cone / shuttle, lower is faster, so a 95th-percentile mark means faster than 95% of peers. Hover any percentile for the exact peer group and sample size. A missing row means he hasn't posted that measurement.
Everything that could go wrong with Chico Holt, gathered in one place — the most serious flags listed first.
Pre-mortem: No material failure modes surface on Chico Holt from current data.
No draft-media headlines link here yet — when an outlet we track writes this player up, it lands in this panel automatically.
Roster-based need returns once the 2026 season is played — grading this year’s teams on last year’s depth chart would be guessing. What’s knowable now: the teams holding picks around No. 225, and which of them already spent premium capital at RB / WR / TE in the 2026 draft.
Gold means no recent premium investment at RB / WR / TE — the cleaner fit on paper. Grey means they already spent one.