Dynasty rookie board
The same career-value model that runs the big board, pointed at the only question a dynasty GM ever has: which rookies return fantasy production, and for how long. Quarterbacks, running backs, receivers and tight ends only — nobody starts a left tackle.
The 2023 class has been drafted — this board is the model’s pre-draft read, useful as a receipt against how the rookies actually landed.
1QB starts one quarterback, so even good QB prospects slide — QBs carry a 0.80 multiplier. Superflex starts two, which makes the position the scarcest asset in the format — QBs carry 1.30 instead. Nothing else changes between the two boards.
| # | Player | Pos | College | Dynasty score | How it's built | Bust | Tier | Consensus |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jaxon Smith-Njigba | WR | Ohio St. | 109.1 | 99.1 × 1.10 | 1% | Elite | 12 |
| 2 | Michael Mayer | TE | Notre Dame | 83.8 | 88.2 × 0.95 | 1% | Starter | 16 |
| 3 | Jordan Addison | WR | USC | 83.5 | 75.9 × 1.10 | 7% | Starter | 21 |
| 4 | Bijan Robinson | RB | Texas | 82.5 | 97.1 × 0.85 × 1.00 | 15% | Elite | 5 |
| 5 | Quentin Johnston | WR | TCU | 81.9 | 74.4 × 1.10 | 0% | Starter | 22 |
| 6 | Zay Flowers | WR | Boston Col. | 76.4 | 69.4 × 1.10 | 4% | Elite | 26 |
| 7 | Josh Downs | WR | North Carolina | 72.8 | 66.2 × 1.10 | 4% | Elite | 41 |
| 8 | Bryce Young | QB | Alabama | 72.8 | 91.0 × 0.80 | 16% | Elite | 1 |
| 9 | Dalton Kincaid | TE | Utah | 72.3 | 76.1 × 0.95 | 10% | Starter | 25 |
| 10 | Anthony Richardson | QB | Florida | 71.5 | 89.3 × 0.80 | 25% | Starter | 9 |
| 11 | Darnell Washington | TE | Georgia | 71.3 | 75.0 × 0.95 | 15% | Role player | 31 |
| 12 | Jalin Hyatt | WR | Tennessee | 71.2 | 64.7 × 1.10 | 1% | Role player | 43 |
| 13 | Luke Musgrave | TE | Oregon St. | 70.0 | 73.7 × 0.95 | 12% | Starter | 52 |
| 14 | Jahmyr Gibbs | RB | Alabama | 69.7 | 82.0 × 0.85 × 1.00 | 6% | Elite | 23 |
| 15 | Tyler Scott | WR | Cincinnati | 68.6 | 62.4 × 1.10 | 7% | Role player | 70 |
| 16 | C.J. Stroud | QB | Ohio St. | 67.2 | 84.1 × 0.80 | 22% | Elite | 3 |
| 17 | Sam LaPorta | TE | Iowa | 65.9 | 69.4 × 0.95 | 7% | Elite | 56 |
| 18 | Rashee Rice | WR | SMU | 60.0 | 54.5 × 1.10 | 0% | Starter | 81 |
| 19 | Xavier Hutchinson | WR | Iowa St. | 58.8 | 53.5 × 1.10 | 32% | Role player | 90 |
| 20 | A.T. Perry | WR | Wake Forest | 58.6 | 53.3 × 1.10 | 1% | Role player | 112 |
| 21 | Will Levis | QB | Kentucky | 57.1 | 71.4 × 0.80 | 20% | Starter | 24 |
| 22 | Marvin Mims | WR | Oklahoma | 56.8 | 51.6 × 1.10 | 0% | Elite | 71 |
| 23 | Zach Charbonnet | RB | UCLA | 56.6 | 67.6 × 0.85 × 0.98 | 22% | Role player | 63 |
| 24 | Hendon Hooker | QB | Tennessee | 55.0 | 68.8 × 0.80 | 15% | Starter | 48 |
| 25 | Tucker Kraft | TE | South Dakota St. | 54.5 | 57.4 × 0.95 | 25% | Starter | 72 |
| 26 | Tyjae Spears | RB | Tulane | 53.4 | 62.8 × 0.85 × 1.00 | 22% | Role player | 75 |
| 27 | Tank Dell | WR | Houston | 52.8 | 48.0 × 1.10 | 3% | Starter | 89 |
| 28 | Roschon Johnson | RB | Texas | 51.8 | 61.7 × 0.85 × 0.99 | 19% | Role player | 108 |
| 29 | Kendre Miller | RB | TCU | 51.5 | 60.6 × 0.85 × 1.00 | 6% | Role player | 93 |
| 30 | Jayden Reed | WR | Michigan St. | 50.7 | 46.1 × 1.10 | 29% | Starter | 103 |
| 31 | Luke Schoonmaker | TE | Michigan | 49.2 | 51.8 × 0.95 | 23% | Role player | 137 |
| 32 | Tank Bigsby | RB | Auburn | 49.2 | 57.9 × 0.85 × 1.00 | 6% | Role player | 122 |
| 33 | Dontayvion Wicks | WR | Virginia | 47.2 | 42.9 × 1.10 | 13% | Role player | 139 |
| 34 | Jonathan Mingo | WR | Mississippi | 46.5 | 42.3 × 1.10 | 1% | Role player | 69 |
| 35 | De'Von Achane | RB | Texas A&M | 45.0 | 52.9 × 0.85 × 1.00 | 7% | Starter | 68 |
| 36 | Cedric Tillman | WR | Tennessee | 44.0 | 40.0 × 1.10 | 8% | Role player | 62 |
| 37 | Andrei Iosivas | WR | Princeton | 42.8 | 38.9 × 1.10 | 30% | Starter | 167 |
| 38 | Kayshon Boutte | WR | LSU | 42.6 | 38.7 × 1.10 | 23% | Role player | 66 |
| 39 | Israel Abanikanda | RB | Pittsburgh | 41.7 | 49.1 × 0.85 × 1.00 | 10% | Role player | 73 |
| 40 | Clayton Tune | QB | Houston | 39.9 | 49.8 × 0.80 | 16% | Role player | 154 |
| 41 | Puka Nacua | WR | BYU | 39.9 | 36.2 × 1.10 | 50% | Elite | 160 |
| 42 | Deuce Vaughn | RB | Kansas St. | 39.2 | 46.1 × 0.85 × 1.00 | 23% | Role player | 151 |
| 43 | Michael Wilson | WR | Stanford | 38.8 | 35.3 × 1.10 | 31% | Starter | 113 |
| 44 | DeMario Douglas | WR | Liberty | 38.1 | 34.7 × 1.10 | 48% | Role player | 183 |
| 45 | DeWayne McBride | RB | Ala-Birmingham | 37.8 | 44.5 × 0.85 × 1.00 | 22% | Role player | 144 |
| 46 | Tre Tucker | WR | Cincinnati | 37.4 | 34.0 × 1.10 | 36% | Starter | 177 |
| 47 | Ronnie Bell | WR | Michigan | 35.4 | 32.2 × 1.10 | 20% | Role player | 187 |
| 48 | Parker Washington | WR | Penn St. | 34.6 | 31.4 × 1.10 | 4% | Starter | 149 |
| 49 | Zach Evans | RB | Mississippi | 34.6 | 40.8 × 0.85 × 1.00 | 14% | Bust | 91 |
| 50 | Zack Kuntz | TE | Old Dominion | 34.4 | 36.2 × 0.95 | 49% | Bust | 156 |
| 51 | Justin Shorter | WR | Florida | 34.4 | 31.3 × 1.10 | 17% | Bust | 173 |
| 52 | Grant Dubose | WR | Charlotte | 34.0 | 30.9 × 1.10 | 21% | Bust | 176 |
| 53 | Eric Gray | RB | Oklahoma | 33.9 | 43.1 × 0.85 × 0.93 | 27% | Role player | 86 |
| 54 | Chase Brown | RB | Illinois | 33.9 | 42.2 × 0.85 × 0.94 | 13% | Role player | 153 |
| 55 | Brenton Strange | TE | Penn St. | 33.6 | 35.3 × 0.95 | 16% | Role player | 130 |
| 56 | Chris Rodriguez | RB | Kentucky | 33.5 | 40.6 × 0.85 × 0.97 | 6% | Role player | 198 |
| 57 | Charlie Jones | WR | Purdue | 31.1 | 28.2 × 1.10 | 26% | Bust | 138 |
| 58 | Davis Allen | TE | Clemson | 30.8 | 32.4 × 0.95 | 24% | Role player | 78 |
| 59 | Jalen Brooks | WR | South Carolina | 30.6 | 27.8 × 1.10 | 37% | Bust | — |
| 60 | Jaren Hall | QB | BYU | 29.8 | 37.2 × 0.80 | 31% | Role player | 111 |
| 61 | Kenny McIntosh | RB | Georgia | 28.6 | 35.8 × 0.85 × 0.94 | 49% | Bust | 95 |
| 62 | Lew Nichols | RB | Central Michigan | 26.2 | 30.9 × 0.85 × 1.00 | 63% | Bust | — |
| 63 | Jake Haener | QB | Fresno St. | 26.0 | 32.5 × 0.80 | 26% | Role player | 125 |
| 64 | Derius Davis | WR | TCU | 25.5 | 23.2 × 1.10 | 19% | Elite | — |
| 65 | Will Mallory | TE | Miami (FL) | 25.4 | 26.7 × 0.95 | 39% | Role player | 127 |
| 66 | Antoine Green | WR | North Carolina | 25.1 | 22.8 × 1.10 | 35% | Bust | 217 |
| 67 | Max Duggan | QB | TCU | 24.5 | 30.6 × 0.80 | 27% | — | — |
| 68 | Dorian Thompson-Robinson | QB | UCLA | 24.2 | 30.2 × 0.80 | 28% | Role player | 124 |
| 69 | Colton Dowell | WR | UT Martin | 23.9 | 21.8 × 1.10 | 9% | Bust | — |
| 70 | Elijah Higgins | WR | Stanford | 23.9 | 21.8 × 1.10 | 30% | Role player | 210 |
| 71 | Brayden Willis | TE | Oklahoma | 23.7 | 25.0 × 0.95 | 23% | Bust | — |
| 72 | Evan Hull | RB | Northwestern | 23.6 | 28.5 × 0.85 × 0.97 | 14% | Bust | 182 |
| 73 | Stetson Bennett | QB | Georgia | 23.0 | 28.7 × 0.80 | 30% | Bust | 101 |
| 74 | Cameron Latu | TE | Alabama | 21.9 | 23.1 × 0.95 | 31% | Starter | 186 |
| 75 | Sean Clifford | QB | Penn St. | 21.7 | 27.1 × 0.80 | 25% | Role player | — |
| 76 | Payne Durham | TE | Purdue | 21.7 | 22.9 × 0.95 | 40% | Role player | 196 |
| 77 | Trey Palmer | WR | Nebraska | 20.4 | 18.5 × 1.10 | 50% | Role player | 76 |
| 78 | Josh Whyle | TE | Cincinnati | 17.5 | 18.4 × 0.95 | 28% | Role player | 190 |
| 79 | Tanner McKee | QB | Stanford | 17.1 | 21.4 × 0.80 | 46% | Bust | 141 |
| 80 | Aidan O'Connell | QB | Purdue | 14.2 | 17.7 × 0.80 | 32% | Starter | 195 |
How this differs from the big board
Built from the same models as the big board — here's exactly how the lens differs. The base is the served career-value model score, untouched. On top of it sit three documented adjustments, all shown per player in the table:
Dynasty score = model score × position multiplier (1QB) × RB age multiplier
- Position: QB ×0.80, RB ×0.85, WR ×1.10, TE ×0.95 — QB scarcity by format, the RB career-length discount, the WR longevity premium, the TE slow-onboarding haircut.
- RB age cliff: RB only: 1.00 at age 22 or younger at draft, minus 0.05 per year older, floor 0.85. When we don't have a player's age on file, no adjustment is applied and the row says so.
- Tier reads: shown only where the tier model itself stands behind them; when it isn't confident, you get a dash, not a guess.
The multipliers are round numbers encoding dynasty-market convention (QB scarcity by format, the RB age cliff, WR longevity, the TE year-3 breakout) — convention, not Draftanomics research. The model signal is entirely in the base. College production volume (target and workload share) is already inside the base score as model features — it isn't double-counted here. See methodology for how the career-value model is fit and validated.