Draftanomics
  • 2027 board
  • All prospects
  • By college
  • By position
  • Consensus board
  • 2028 way-too-early
  • How the draft works
  • When is the draft
  • Draft news
  • Simulator
  • The house mock
  • Draft order
  • Trade calculator
  • The Scouting Slate
  • Sleepers & reaches
  • Movers & fallers
  • Player comps
  • Team needs
  • Dynasty rookie board
  • Glossary
  • Track record
  • Past drafts, re-graded
  • Analyst leaderboard
My rankingsAccount
Get the weekly →
Draftanomics

Honest NFL Draft analytics. The model's receipts against actual NFL teams live on the track record.

Boards
  • 2027 board
  • Consensus board
  • Sleepers
Tools
  • Mock draft simulator
  • Plays Like
  • Dynasty rookie board
Track Record
  • Year-by-year results
  • Accountability Index
  • Our board, on the record
  • Past drafts, re-graded
  • Methodology
  • Developers · free API
  • About
Account
  • My board
  • Weekly email
Data + sources
RAS by Kent Lee Platte·Consensus Big Board (Arif Hasan)·nflverse·PFR·CFBD·All sources & credits·Methodology
Career-value model, live
Privacy·Terms·Press ⌘K to search·Draftanomics2026
  1. Draftanomics/
  2. 2028 board/
  3. CHI

CHI

2028 team hub
Refreshed just now
GM:Ryan Poles
Scheme:Vertical4-3Cover 3Speed Rusher
Picks
7
1st @ #24
Draft capital
12.1
more capital than 28% of teams
Top model fit
Julian Sayin
QB · best blend of grade and roster need
🎯Mock as this team
CHI
TeamTeam hub·
ClassMock draft simulator
Target boardDraft capitalHaul gradeSchemeCap outlook

Who CHI should take — each prospect's model grade, weighted up where the roster is thin, so highly graded players at positions CHI needs rise to the top.

50/50 prospects
Rank↑PlayerPosTierCollegePos needModel rankFitWhy he fits
1
Julian Sayinrank#32
QB1st Round· Ohio State· model #32
QB1st RoundOhio Statelow need#320.51A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a first-rounder.
2
Darian Mensahrank#37
QBDay 2· Miami· model #37
QBDay 2Miamilow need#370.51A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player.
3
Xavier Atkinsrank#3$12.5M
LBBlue Chip· Auburn· model #3
LBBlue ChipAuburnlow need#30.50A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board says top-15 talent.
4
Amare Campbellrank#5$10.4M
LBBlue Chip· Tennessee· model #5
LBBlue ChipTennesseelow need#50.50A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board says top-15 talent.
5
Brent Gordon
SBlue Chip· Louisiana· model #1
SBlue ChipLouisianalow need#10.50A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board says top-15 talent.
6
Jadon Mayfield
LBBlue Chip· Louisiana Tech· model #6
LBBlue ChipLouisiana Techlow need#60.49A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board says top-15 talent.
7
Taye Brown
LB1st Round· Arizona· model #11
LB1st RoundArizonalow need#110.49A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board says top-15 talent.
8
Kam Franklinrank#12$7.3M
DL1st Round· Ole Miss· model #12
DL1st RoundOle Misslow need#120.49A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board says top-15 talent.
9
Sammy Brownrank#13$6.9M
LB1st Round· Clemson· model #13
LB1st RoundClemsonlow need#130.49A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board says top-15 talent.
10
William Echolesrank#14$6.5M
DL1st Round· Ole Miss· model #14
DL1st RoundOle Misslow need#140.49A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board says top-15 talent.
11
TJ Bushrank#24$4.6M
DL1st Round· Minnesota· model #24
DL1st RoundMinnesotalow need#240.49A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a first-rounder.
12
Suntarine Perkinsrank#23$4.7M
LB1st Round· Ole Miss· model #23
LB1st RoundOle Misslow need#230.49A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a first-rounder.
13
Owen Chamblissrank#22$4.7M
LB1st Round· Nebraska· model #22
LB1st RoundNebraskalow need#220.49A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a first-rounder.
14
Kameryn Fountainrank#19$5.1M
DL1st Round· USC· model #19
DL1st RoundUSClow need#190.49A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a first-rounder.
15
Charles Correa
LB1st Round· Purdue· model #16
LB1st RoundPurduelow need#160.49A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a first-rounder.
16
Boubacar Traorerank#15$6.2M
DL1st Round· Notre Dame· model #15
DL1st RoundNotre Damelow need#150.49A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board says top-15 talent.
17
Chris Cole
LB1st Round· Georgia· model #27
LB1st RoundGeorgialow need#270.49A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a first-rounder.
18
Daymion Sanfordrank#29$4.3M
EDGE1st Round· Texas A&M· model #29
EDGE1st RoundTexas A&Mlow need#290.49A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a first-rounder.
19
Quincy Rhodes Jr.rank#30$4.2M
DL1st Round· Arkansas· model #30
DL1st RoundArkansaslow need#300.49A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a first-rounder.
20
Mason Posa
LB1st Round· Wisconsin· model #31
LB1st RoundWisconsinlow need#310.48A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a first-rounder.
21
Dylan Raiolarank#109
QBDay 3· Oregon· model #109
QBDay 3Oregonlow need#1090.48A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board has him at No. 109.
22
Omar Thornton
LBDay 2· Miami· model #33
LBDay 2Miamilow need#330.48A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player.
23
Malcolm McCain
LBDay 2· Miami (OH)· model #36
LBDay 2Miami (OH)low need#360.48A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player.
24
Nate Bennett
QBDay 3· Baylor· model #111
QBDay 3Baylorlow need#1110.48A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board has him at No. 111.
25
Luke Mergottrank#38$3.6M
LBDay 2· Duke· model #38
LBDay 2Dukelow need#380.48A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player.
26
Will Heldtrank#40$3.4M
EDGEDay 2· Clemson· model #40
EDGEDay 2Clemsonlow need#400.48A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player.
27
Matayo Uiagaleleirank#43$3.2M
EDGEDay 2· Oregon· model #43
EDGEDay 2Oregonlow need#430.48A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player.
28
Teitum Tuioti
EDGEDay 2· Oregon· model #44
EDGEDay 2Oregonlow need#440.47A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player.
29
Yhonzae Pierre
EDGEDay 2· Alabama· model #45
EDGEDay 2Alabamalow need#450.47A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player.
30
Dylan Stewartrank#46$2.9M
EDGEDay 2· South Carolina· model #46
EDGEDay 2South Carolinalow need#460.47A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player.
31
Everett Roussaw Jr.
LBDay 2· Arizona· model #48
LBDay 2Arizonalow need#480.47A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player.
32
Myles Grahamrank#49$2.7M
LBDay 2· Florida· model #49
LBDay 2Floridalow need#490.47A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player.
33
Josiah Taylor
LBDay 2· Florida International· model #54
LBDay 2Florida Internationallow need#540.47A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player.
34
Aiden Hall
LBDay 2· Wake Forest· model #51
LBDay 2Wake Forestlow need#510.47A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player.
35
Braylan Lovelace
LBDay 2· Pittsburgh· model #52
LBDay 2Pittsburghlow need#520.47A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player.
36
Isaiah Neal
DLDay 2· Pittsburgh· model #53
DLDay 2Pittsburghlow need#530.47A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player.
37
Keviyan Huddlestonrank#56$2.4M
EDGEDay 2· Oklahoma State· model #56
EDGEDay 2Oklahoma Statelow need#560.47A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player.
38
Raylen Wilson
LBDay 2· Georgia· model #57
LBDay 2Georgialow need#570.47A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player.
39
Elija Waltonrank#123$1.4M
ATHDay 3· Georgia Southern· model #123
ATHDay 3Georgia Southernlow need#1230.47A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board has him at No. 123.
40
Khai Preanrank#124$1.4M
ATHDay 3· Tulane· model #124
ATHDay 3Tulanelow need#1240.47A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board has him at No. 124.
41
Tyler Cherry
QBDay 3· Indiana· model #126
QBDay 3Indianalow need#1260.47A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board has him at No. 126.
42
Zy'Aire Fletcher
ATHDay 3· Kent State· model #127
ATHDay 3Kent Statelow need#1270.47A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board has him at No. 127.
43
Devon Dampierrank#128
QBDay 3· Utah· model #128
QBDay 3Utahlow need#1280.47A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board has him at No. 128.
44
Anthony Bynum
EDGEDay 2· Georgia Southern· model #61
EDGEDay 2Georgia Southernlow need#610.47A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player.
45
Demond Williams Jr.
QBDay 3· Washington· model #130
QBDay 3Washingtonlow need#1300.47A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board has him at No. 130.
46
Bruno Dallrank#63$2M
DLDay 2· UCF· model #63
DLDay 2UCFlow need#630.47A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player.
47
Mario Landinorank#67$1.9M
DLDay 2· Indiana· model #67
DLDay 2Indianalow need#670.47A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player.
48
Bryan Longwell
LBDay 2· Vanderbilt· model #64
LBDay 2Vanderbiltlow need#640.47A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player.
49
Drayk Bowenrank#66$1.9M
LBDay 2· Notre Dame· model #66
LBDay 2Notre Damelow need#660.47A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player.
50
Markis Dealrank#68$1.9M
DLDay 2· TCU· model #68
DLDay 2TCUlow need#680.47A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player.