On the live board, bust risk sits at 30% and the realistic range is No. 126 to No. 260.
Cam Cook turned 296 rushing attempts into 1,666 yards and 16 touchdowns in 2025, a workhorse season out of a 180-pound frame that doesn't usually carry that kind of number. The 2027 model board files him at No. 209 overall, but no public boards have him ranked yet, and the projection is built on a thin two-season file.
Headline grade, verdict, and the one-line scout take
Our two reads split on him — the consensus-calibrated view runs much hotter than the board slot, and no public boards rank him yet to break the tie. Treat the range as wide.
Too early to project a career arc.
No public board has ranked this prospect and the model has no production, athletic, or NFL data to anchor on — any percentages here would be noise dressed up as precision. The outlook fills in once boards rank him or real numbers land.
No public-board coverage yet.
The written report — drafted from the fact sheet, every number traceable, honest about what we can't see yet
Which signals drove the grade up or down — in plain English
The analyst room, accuracy-weighted, plus where Draftanomics disagrees with it
Measurables, traits, and college play quality
Historical players this prospect resembles
Bust probability, injury history, character flags, pre-mortem
How well this prospect fits each of the 32 team schemes
Probability he's still on the board at each of your picks
Clips, scout notes, voice memos, written reports
Highlight reels indexed from YouTube. Loads only when you press play.
The grade is held down by how many boards rank him top-100, production trajectory, and scout consensus.
The grade is the 0-to-1 score the board sorts by — it only means something next to the rest of this class, which is why the rank above it is the number to quote.
Roster-based need returns once the 2026 season is played — grading this year’s teams on last year’s depth chart would be guessing. What’s knowable now: the teams holding picks around No. 209, and which of them already spent premium capital at RB / WR / TE in the 2026 draft.
Gold means no recent premium investment at RB / WR / TE — the cleaner fit on paper. Grey means they already spent one.
No sourced scouting observations indexed yet — this read is model-only.
Draftanomics files Cook at No. 209 overall on the 2027 model board with a starter-tier read, but no consensus board carries him yet, so there's nothing to check the model against. The bust number comes in at 30%, with a wide 25.7% to 50% interval, and that spread is the tell: two seasons, three programs, and a frame that hasn't been proven to hold up under that kind of workload. Call it a speculative late bet on the workload spike, not a projection you build a draft plan around.
Written by Draftanomics's models from the statistical record — no scouting sources cover this player yet, so no film claims appear. Every number is machine-checked against the live data before publication. How these reports are written →
Broke out in 2025 after transferring from TCU to Jville St — 1,650 rushing yards after never topping 454 in a season before.
| Season | Team | Games | Carries | Rush yards | Rush TD | Rec | Rec yards |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | TCU | 9 | 16 | 58 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2024 | TCU | 12 | 116 | 454 | 9 | 19 | 83 |
| 2025 | Jville St | 13 | 295 | 1,650 | 16 | 30 | 291 |
Counting stats from charted college games. A dash means the stat wasn't recorded that season.
Percentiles are direction-aware — for 40-time / 3-cone / shuttle, lower is faster, so a 95th-percentile mark means faster than 95% of peers. Hover any percentile for the exact peer group and sample size. A missing row means he hasn't posted that measurement.
Everything that could go wrong with Cam Cook, gathered in one place — the most serious flags listed first.
Pre-mortem: No material failure modes surface on Cam Cook from current data.
No draft-media headlines link here yet — when an outlet we track writes this player up, it lands in this panel automatically.