| 1 | SBlue Chip· Louisiana· model #1 | S | Blue Chip | Louisiana | low need | #1 | 0.56 | A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board says top-15 talent. |
| 2 | QB1st Round· Ohio State· model #32 | QB | 1st Round | Ohio State | depth need | #32 | 0.54 | Adds depth where the roster is thin; the board sees a first-rounder. |
| 3 | QBDay 2· Miami· model #37 | QB | Day 2 | Miami | depth need | #37 | 0.54 | Adds depth where the roster is thin; the board sees a top-100 player. |
| 4 | QBDay 3· Oregon· model #109 | QB | Day 3 | Oregon | depth need | #109 | 0.51 | Adds depth where the roster is thin; the board has him at No. 109. |
| 5 | QBDay 3· Baylor· model #111 | QB | Day 3 | Baylor | depth need | #111 | 0.51 | Adds depth where the roster is thin; the board has him at No. 111. |
| 6 | SBlue Chip· Southern Miss· model #2 | S | Blue Chip | Southern Miss | low need | #2 | 0.51 | A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board says top-15 talent. |
| 7 | SBlue Chip· App State· model #4 | S | Blue Chip | App State | low need | #4 | 0.50 | A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board says top-15 talent. |
| 8 | WR1st Round· Ohio State· model #26 | WR | 1st Round | Ohio State | low need | #26 | 0.50 | A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a first-rounder. |
| 9 | QBDay 3· Indiana· model #126 | QB | Day 3 | Indiana | depth need | #126 | 0.50 | Adds depth where the roster is thin; the board has him at No. 126. |
| 10 | QBDay 3· Utah· model #128 | QB | Day 3 | Utah | depth need | #128 | 0.50 | Adds depth where the roster is thin; the board has him at No. 128. |
| 11 | CB1st Round· Clemson· model #7 | CB | 1st Round | Clemson | low need | #7 | 0.50 | A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board says top-15 talent. |
| 12 | CB1st Round· TCU· model #8 | CB | 1st Round | TCU | low need | #8 | 0.50 | A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board says top-15 talent. |
| 13 | S1st Round· Bowling Green· model #9 | S | 1st Round | Bowling Green | low need | #9 | 0.50 | A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board says top-15 talent. |
| 14 | S1st Round· Georgia· model #10 | S | 1st Round | Georgia | low need | #10 | 0.50 | A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board says top-15 talent. |
| 15 | QBDay 3· Washington· model #130 | QB | Day 3 | Washington | depth need | #130 | 0.50 | Adds depth where the roster is thin; the board has him at No. 130. |
| 16 | QBDay 3· UCF· model #133 | QB | Day 3 | UCF | depth need | #133 | 0.49 | Adds depth where the roster is thin; the board has him at No. 133. |
| 17 | S1st Round· Mississippi State· model #20 | S | 1st Round | Mississippi State | low need | #20 | 0.49 | A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a first-rounder. |
| 18 | S1st Round· Michigan· model #17 | S | 1st Round | Michigan | low need | #17 | 0.49 | A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a first-rounder. |
| 19 | CB1st Round· Hawai'i· model #18 | CB | 1st Round | Hawai'i | low need | #18 | 0.49 | A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a first-rounder. |
| 20 | CB1st Round· Kansas State· model #25 | CB | 1st Round | Kansas State | low need | #25 | 0.49 | A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a first-rounder. |
| 21 | S1st Round· Florida International· model #21 | S | 1st Round | Florida International | low need | #21 | 0.49 | A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a first-rounder. |
| 22 | S1st Round· Georgia· model #28 | S | 1st Round | Georgia | low need | #28 | 0.49 | A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a first-rounder. |
| 23 | QBDay 3· Texas State· model #137 | QB | Day 3 | Texas State | depth need | #137 | 0.49 | Adds depth where the roster is thin; the board has him at No. 137. |
| 24 | RBDay 2· Boston College· model #39 | RB | Day 2 | Boston College | low need | #39 | 0.49 | A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player. |
| 25 | SDay 2· Texas A&M· model #34 | S | Day 2 | Texas A&M | low need | #34 | 0.49 | A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player. |
| 26 | SDay 2· Iowa· model #35 | S | Day 2 | Iowa | low need | #35 | 0.49 | A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player. |
| 27 | RBDay 2· BYU· model #41 | RB | Day 2 | BYU | low need | #41 | 0.49 | A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player. |
| 28 | RBDay 2· Vanderbilt· model #42 | RB | Day 2 | Vanderbilt | low need | #42 | 0.49 | A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player. |
| 29 | QBDay 3· Texas· model #142 | QB | Day 3 | Texas | depth need | #142 | 0.48 | Adds depth where the roster is thin; the board has him at No. 142. |
| 30 | RBDay 2· Georgia Tech· model #47 | RB | Day 2 | Georgia Tech | low need | #47 | 0.48 | A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player. |
| 31 | RBDay 2· Miami· model #50 | RB | Day 2 | Miami | low need | #50 | 0.48 | A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player. |
| 32 | QBDay 3· NC State· model #145 | QB | Day 3 | NC State | depth need | #145 | 0.48 | Adds depth where the roster is thin; the board has him at No. 145. |
| 33 | RBDay 2· UTSA· model #55 | RB | Day 2 | UTSA | low need | #55 | 0.48 | A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player. |
| 34 | RBDay 2· Tennessee· model #59 | RB | Day 2 | Tennessee | low need | #59 | 0.48 | A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player. |
| 35 | RBDay 2· Louisville· model #60 | RB | Day 2 | Louisville | low need | #60 | 0.48 | A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player. |
| 36 | SDay 2· East Carolina· model #58 | S | Day 2 | East Carolina | low need | #58 | 0.47 | A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player. |
| 37 | SDay 2· Arizona State· model #69 | S | Day 2 | Arizona State | low need | #69 | 0.47 | A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player. |
| 38 | SDay 2· Clemson· model #62 | S | Day 2 | Clemson | low need | #62 | 0.47 | A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player. |
| 39 | SDay 2· Maryland· model #65 | S | Day 2 | Maryland | low need | #65 | 0.47 | A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player. |
| 40 | SDay 2· Miami· model #70 | S | Day 2 | Miami | low need | #70 | 0.47 | A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player. |
| 41 | SDay 2· Florida· model #75 | S | Day 2 | Florida | low need | #75 | 0.47 | A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player. |
| 42 | ATHDay 3· Kent State· model #127 | ATH | Day 3 | Kent State | low need | #127 | 0.47 | A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board has him at No. 127. |
| 43 | ATHDay 3· Georgia Southern· model #123 | ATH | Day 3 | Georgia Southern | low need | #123 | 0.47 | A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board has him at No. 123. |
| 44 | ATHDay 3· Tulane· model #124 | ATH | Day 3 | Tulane | low need | #124 | 0.47 | A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board has him at No. 124. |
| 45 | WRDay 2· Temple· model #87 | WR | Day 2 | Temple | low need | #87 | 0.47 | A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player. |
| 46 | WRDay 2· Kent State· model #89 | WR | Day 2 | Kent State | low need | #89 | 0.47 | A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player. |
| 47 | WRDay 2· Florida International· model #88 | WR | Day 2 | Florida International | low need | #88 | 0.47 | A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player. |
| 48 | RBDay 3· Oregon· model #112 | RB | Day 3 | Oregon | low need | #112 | 0.46 | A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board has him at No. 112. |
| 49 | RBDay 3· Texas Tech· model #113 | RB | Day 3 | Texas Tech | low need | #113 | 0.46 | A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board has him at No. 113. |
| 50 | RBDay 3· Mississippi State· model #114 | RB | Day 3 | Mississippi State | low need | #114 | 0.46 | A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board has him at No. 114. |