Draftanomics
  • 2027 board
  • All prospects
  • By college
  • By position
  • Consensus board
  • 2028 way-too-early
  • How the draft works
  • When is the draft
  • Draft news
  • Simulator
  • The house mock
  • Draft order
  • Trade calculator
  • The Scouting Slate
  • Sleepers & reaches
  • Movers & fallers
  • Player comps
  • Team needs
  • Dynasty rookie board
  • Glossary
  • Track record
  • Past drafts, re-graded
  • Analyst leaderboard
My rankingsAccount
Get the weekly →
Draftanomics

Honest NFL Draft analytics. The model's receipts against actual NFL teams live on the track record.

Boards
  • 2027 board
  • Consensus board
  • Sleepers
Tools
  • Mock draft simulator
  • Plays Like
  • Dynasty rookie board
Track Record
  • Year-by-year results
  • Accountability Index
  • Our board, on the record
  • Past drafts, re-graded
  • Methodology
  • Developers · free API
  • About
Account
  • My board
  • Weekly email
Data + sources
RAS by Kent Lee Platte·Consensus Big Board (Arif Hasan)·nflverse·PFR·CFBD·All sources & credits·Methodology
Career-value model, live
Privacy·Terms·Press ⌘K to search·Draftanomics2026
  1. Draftanomics/
  2. 2028 board/
  3. NYJ

NYJ

2028 team hub
Refreshed just now
GM:Darren Mougeynew regime
Scheme:Vertical4-3Man PressPower Setter
Picks
7
1st @ #6
Draft capital
29.6
more capital than 84% of teams
Top model fit
Julian Sayin
QB · best blend of grade and roster need
🎯Mock as this team
NYJ
TeamTeam hub·
ClassMock draft simulator
Target boardDraft capitalHaul gradeSchemeCap outlook
NYJ's biggest positional needs
QBcritical need
top fit: Julian Sayin (QB)

Who NYJ should take — each prospect's model grade, weighted up where the roster is thin, so highly graded players at positions NYJ needs rise to the top.

50/50 prospects
Rank↑PlayerPosTierCollegePos needModel rankFitWhy he fits
1
Julian Sayinrank#32
QB1st Round· Ohio State· model #32· critical need
QB1st RoundOhio Statecritical need#320.59Fills one of the biggest holes on the roster; the board sees a first-rounder.
2
Darian Mensahrank#37
QBDay 2· Miami· model #37· critical need
QBDay 2Miamicritical need#370.59Fills one of the biggest holes on the roster; the board sees a top-100 player.
3
Dylan Raiolarank#109
QBDay 3· Oregon· model #109· critical need
QBDay 3Oregoncritical need#1090.56Fills one of the biggest holes on the roster; the board has him at No. 109.
4
Nate Bennett
QBDay 3· Baylor· model #111· critical need
QBDay 3Baylorcritical need#1110.56Fills one of the biggest holes on the roster; the board has him at No. 111.
5
Tyler Cherry
QBDay 3· Indiana· model #126· critical need
QBDay 3Indianacritical need#1260.55Fills one of the biggest holes on the roster; the board has him at No. 126.
6
Devon Dampierrank#128
QBDay 3· Utah· model #128· critical need
QBDay 3Utahcritical need#1280.55Fills one of the biggest holes on the roster; the board has him at No. 128.
7
Demond Williams Jr.
QBDay 3· Washington· model #130· critical need
QBDay 3Washingtoncritical need#1300.54Fills one of the biggest holes on the roster; the board has him at No. 130.
8
EJ Colson
QBDay 3· UCF· model #133· critical need
QBDay 3UCFcritical need#1330.54Fills one of the biggest holes on the roster; the board has him at No. 133.
9
Brad Jackson
QBDay 3· Texas State· model #137· critical need
QBDay 3Texas Statecritical need#1370.54Fills one of the biggest holes on the roster; the board has him at No. 137.
10
Arch Manningrank#142
QBDay 3· Texas· model #142· critical need
QBDay 3Texascritical need#1420.53Fills one of the biggest holes on the roster; the board has him at No. 142.
11
Brent Gordon
SBlue Chip· Louisiana· model #1
SBlue ChipLouisianalow need#10.53A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board says top-15 talent.
12
CJ Bailey
QBDay 3· NC State· model #145· critical need
QBDay 3NC Statecritical need#1450.53Fills one of the biggest holes on the roster; the board has him at No. 145.
13
Xavier Atkinsrank#3$12.5M
LBBlue Chip· Auburn· model #3
LBBlue ChipAuburnlow need#30.53A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board says top-15 talent.
14
Amare Campbellrank#5$10.4M
LBBlue Chip· Tennessee· model #5
LBBlue ChipTennesseelow need#50.53A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board says top-15 talent.
15
Jadon Mayfield
LBBlue Chip· Louisiana Tech· model #6
LBBlue ChipLouisiana Techlow need#60.52A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board says top-15 talent.
16
Taye Brown
LB1st Round· Arizona· model #11
LB1st RoundArizonalow need#110.52A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board says top-15 talent.
17
William Echolesrank#14$6.5M
DL1st Round· Ole Miss· model #14
DL1st RoundOle Misslow need#140.52A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board says top-15 talent.
18
Sammy Brownrank#13$6.9M
LB1st Round· Clemson· model #13
LB1st RoundClemsonlow need#130.52A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board says top-15 talent.
19
Kam Franklinrank#12$7.3M
DL1st Round· Ole Miss· model #12
DL1st RoundOle Misslow need#120.52A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board says top-15 talent.
20
Owen Chamblissrank#22$4.7M
LB1st Round· Nebraska· model #22
LB1st RoundNebraskalow need#220.52A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a first-rounder.
21
Suntarine Perkinsrank#23$4.7M
LB1st Round· Ole Miss· model #23
LB1st RoundOle Misslow need#230.52A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a first-rounder.
22
TJ Bushrank#24$4.6M
DL1st Round· Minnesota· model #24
DL1st RoundMinnesotalow need#240.52A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a first-rounder.
23
Charles Correa
LB1st Round· Purdue· model #16
LB1st RoundPurduelow need#160.52A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a first-rounder.
24
Kameryn Fountainrank#19$5.1M
DL1st Round· USC· model #19
DL1st RoundUSClow need#190.52A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a first-rounder.
25
Boubacar Traorerank#15$6.2M
DL1st Round· Notre Dame· model #15
DL1st RoundNotre Damelow need#150.52A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board says top-15 talent.
26
Chris Cole
LB1st Round· Georgia· model #27
LB1st RoundGeorgialow need#270.52A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a first-rounder.
27
Daymion Sanfordrank#29$4.3M
EDGE1st Round· Texas A&M· model #29
EDGE1st RoundTexas A&Mlow need#290.52A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a first-rounder.
28
Quincy Rhodes Jr.rank#30$4.2M
DL1st Round· Arkansas· model #30
DL1st RoundArkansaslow need#300.52A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a first-rounder.
29
Mason Posa
LB1st Round· Wisconsin· model #31
LB1st RoundWisconsinlow need#310.51A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a first-rounder.
30
Omar Thornton
LBDay 2· Miami· model #33
LBDay 2Miamilow need#330.51A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player.
31
Malcolm McCain
LBDay 2· Miami (OH)· model #36
LBDay 2Miami (OH)low need#360.51A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player.
32
Luke Mergottrank#38$3.6M
LBDay 2· Duke· model #38
LBDay 2Dukelow need#380.51A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player.
33
Will Heldtrank#40$3.4M
EDGEDay 2· Clemson· model #40
EDGEDay 2Clemsonlow need#400.51A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player.
34
Matayo Uiagaleleirank#43$3.2M
EDGEDay 2· Oregon· model #43
EDGEDay 2Oregonlow need#430.51A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player.
35
Nico Iamaleavarank#163
QBDay 3· UCLA· model #163· critical need
QBDay 3UCLAcritical need#1630.51Fills one of the biggest holes on the roster; the board has him at No. 163.
36
Chase Jenkinsrank#164
QBDay 3· Kansas· model #164· critical need
QBDay 3Kansascritical need#1640.50Fills one of the biggest holes on the roster; the board has him at No. 164.
37
Yhonzae Pierre
EDGEDay 2· Alabama· model #45
EDGEDay 2Alabamalow need#450.50A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player.
38
Teitum Tuioti
EDGEDay 2· Oregon· model #44
EDGEDay 2Oregonlow need#440.50A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player.
39
Dylan Stewartrank#46$2.9M
EDGEDay 2· South Carolina· model #46
EDGEDay 2South Carolinalow need#460.50A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player.
40
Everett Roussaw Jr.
LBDay 2· Arizona· model #48
LBDay 2Arizonalow need#480.50A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player.
41
Myles Grahamrank#49$2.7M
LBDay 2· Florida· model #49
LBDay 2Floridalow need#490.50A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player.
42
Aiden Hall
LBDay 2· Wake Forest· model #51
LBDay 2Wake Forestlow need#510.50A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player.
43
Braylan Lovelace
LBDay 2· Pittsburgh· model #52
LBDay 2Pittsburghlow need#520.50A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player.
44
Isaiah Neal
DLDay 2· Pittsburgh· model #53
DLDay 2Pittsburghlow need#530.50A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player.
45
Josiah Taylor
LBDay 2· Florida International· model #54
LBDay 2Florida Internationallow need#540.50A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player.
46
Keviyan Huddlestonrank#56$2.4M
EDGEDay 2· Oklahoma State· model #56
EDGEDay 2Oklahoma Statelow need#560.50A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player.
47
Raylen Wilson
LBDay 2· Georgia· model #57
LBDay 2Georgialow need#570.50A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player.
48
Anthony Bynum
EDGEDay 2· Georgia Southern· model #61
EDGEDay 2Georgia Southernlow need#610.50A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player.
49
Bryan Longwell
LBDay 2· Vanderbilt· model #64
LBDay 2Vanderbiltlow need#640.50A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player.
50
Markis Dealrank#68$1.9M
DLDay 2· TCU· model #68
DLDay 2TCUlow need#680.50A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player.