| 1 | QB1st Round· Ohio State· model #32· critical need | QB | 1st Round | Ohio State | critical need | #32 | 0.59 | Fills one of the biggest holes on the roster; the board sees a first-rounder. |
| 2 | QBDay 2· Miami· model #37· critical need | QB | Day 2 | Miami | critical need | #37 | 0.59 | Fills one of the biggest holes on the roster; the board sees a top-100 player. |
| 3 | QBDay 3· Oregon· model #109· critical need | QB | Day 3 | Oregon | critical need | #109 | 0.56 | Fills one of the biggest holes on the roster; the board has him at No. 109. |
| 4 | QBDay 3· Baylor· model #111· critical need | QB | Day 3 | Baylor | critical need | #111 | 0.56 | Fills one of the biggest holes on the roster; the board has him at No. 111. |
| 5 | QBDay 3· Indiana· model #126· critical need | QB | Day 3 | Indiana | critical need | #126 | 0.55 | Fills one of the biggest holes on the roster; the board has him at No. 126. |
| 6 | QBDay 3· Utah· model #128· critical need | QB | Day 3 | Utah | critical need | #128 | 0.55 | Fills one of the biggest holes on the roster; the board has him at No. 128. |
| 7 | QBDay 3· Washington· model #130· critical need | QB | Day 3 | Washington | critical need | #130 | 0.54 | Fills one of the biggest holes on the roster; the board has him at No. 130. |
| 8 | QBDay 3· UCF· model #133· critical need | QB | Day 3 | UCF | critical need | #133 | 0.54 | Fills one of the biggest holes on the roster; the board has him at No. 133. |
| 9 | QBDay 3· Texas State· model #137· critical need | QB | Day 3 | Texas State | critical need | #137 | 0.54 | Fills one of the biggest holes on the roster; the board has him at No. 137. |
| 10 | QBDay 3· Texas· model #142· critical need | QB | Day 3 | Texas | critical need | #142 | 0.53 | Fills one of the biggest holes on the roster; the board has him at No. 142. |
| 11 | SBlue Chip· Louisiana· model #1 | S | Blue Chip | Louisiana | low need | #1 | 0.53 | A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board says top-15 talent. |
| 12 | QBDay 3· NC State· model #145· critical need | QB | Day 3 | NC State | critical need | #145 | 0.53 | Fills one of the biggest holes on the roster; the board has him at No. 145. |
| 13 | LBBlue Chip· Auburn· model #3 | LB | Blue Chip | Auburn | low need | #3 | 0.53 | A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board says top-15 talent. |
| 14 | LBBlue Chip· Tennessee· model #5 | LB | Blue Chip | Tennessee | low need | #5 | 0.53 | A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board says top-15 talent. |
| 15 | LBBlue Chip· Louisiana Tech· model #6 | LB | Blue Chip | Louisiana Tech | low need | #6 | 0.52 | A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board says top-15 talent. |
| 16 | LB1st Round· Arizona· model #11 | LB | 1st Round | Arizona | low need | #11 | 0.52 | A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board says top-15 talent. |
| 17 | DL1st Round· Ole Miss· model #14 | DL | 1st Round | Ole Miss | low need | #14 | 0.52 | A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board says top-15 talent. |
| 18 | LB1st Round· Clemson· model #13 | LB | 1st Round | Clemson | low need | #13 | 0.52 | A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board says top-15 talent. |
| 19 | DL1st Round· Ole Miss· model #12 | DL | 1st Round | Ole Miss | low need | #12 | 0.52 | A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board says top-15 talent. |
| 20 | LB1st Round· Nebraska· model #22 | LB | 1st Round | Nebraska | low need | #22 | 0.52 | A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a first-rounder. |
| 21 | LB1st Round· Ole Miss· model #23 | LB | 1st Round | Ole Miss | low need | #23 | 0.52 | A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a first-rounder. |
| 22 | DL1st Round· Minnesota· model #24 | DL | 1st Round | Minnesota | low need | #24 | 0.52 | A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a first-rounder. |
| 23 | LB1st Round· Purdue· model #16 | LB | 1st Round | Purdue | low need | #16 | 0.52 | A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a first-rounder. |
| 24 | DL1st Round· USC· model #19 | DL | 1st Round | USC | low need | #19 | 0.52 | A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a first-rounder. |
| 25 | DL1st Round· Notre Dame· model #15 | DL | 1st Round | Notre Dame | low need | #15 | 0.52 | A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board says top-15 talent. |
| 26 | LB1st Round· Georgia· model #27 | LB | 1st Round | Georgia | low need | #27 | 0.52 | A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a first-rounder. |
| 27 | EDGE1st Round· Texas A&M· model #29 | EDGE | 1st Round | Texas A&M | low need | #29 | 0.52 | A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a first-rounder. |
| 28 | DL1st Round· Arkansas· model #30 | DL | 1st Round | Arkansas | low need | #30 | 0.52 | A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a first-rounder. |
| 29 | LB1st Round· Wisconsin· model #31 | LB | 1st Round | Wisconsin | low need | #31 | 0.51 | A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a first-rounder. |
| 30 | LBDay 2· Miami· model #33 | LB | Day 2 | Miami | low need | #33 | 0.51 | A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player. |
| 31 | LBDay 2· Miami (OH)· model #36 | LB | Day 2 | Miami (OH) | low need | #36 | 0.51 | A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player. |
| 32 | LBDay 2· Duke· model #38 | LB | Day 2 | Duke | low need | #38 | 0.51 | A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player. |
| 33 | EDGEDay 2· Clemson· model #40 | EDGE | Day 2 | Clemson | low need | #40 | 0.51 | A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player. |
| 34 | EDGEDay 2· Oregon· model #43 | EDGE | Day 2 | Oregon | low need | #43 | 0.51 | A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player. |
| 35 | QBDay 3· UCLA· model #163· critical need | QB | Day 3 | UCLA | critical need | #163 | 0.51 | Fills one of the biggest holes on the roster; the board has him at No. 163. |
| 36 | QBDay 3· Kansas· model #164· critical need | QB | Day 3 | Kansas | critical need | #164 | 0.50 | Fills one of the biggest holes on the roster; the board has him at No. 164. |
| 37 | EDGEDay 2· Alabama· model #45 | EDGE | Day 2 | Alabama | low need | #45 | 0.50 | A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player. |
| 38 | EDGEDay 2· Oregon· model #44 | EDGE | Day 2 | Oregon | low need | #44 | 0.50 | A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player. |
| 39 | EDGEDay 2· South Carolina· model #46 | EDGE | Day 2 | South Carolina | low need | #46 | 0.50 | A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player. |
| 40 | LBDay 2· Arizona· model #48 | LB | Day 2 | Arizona | low need | #48 | 0.50 | A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player. |
| 41 | LBDay 2· Florida· model #49 | LB | Day 2 | Florida | low need | #49 | 0.50 | A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player. |
| 42 | LBDay 2· Wake Forest· model #51 | LB | Day 2 | Wake Forest | low need | #51 | 0.50 | A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player. |
| 43 | LBDay 2· Pittsburgh· model #52 | LB | Day 2 | Pittsburgh | low need | #52 | 0.50 | A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player. |
| 44 | DLDay 2· Pittsburgh· model #53 | DL | Day 2 | Pittsburgh | low need | #53 | 0.50 | A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player. |
| 45 | LBDay 2· Florida International· model #54 | LB | Day 2 | Florida International | low need | #54 | 0.50 | A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player. |
| 46 | EDGEDay 2· Oklahoma State· model #56 | EDGE | Day 2 | Oklahoma State | low need | #56 | 0.50 | A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player. |
| 47 | LBDay 2· Georgia· model #57 | LB | Day 2 | Georgia | low need | #57 | 0.50 | A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player. |
| 48 | EDGEDay 2· Georgia Southern· model #61 | EDGE | Day 2 | Georgia Southern | low need | #61 | 0.50 | A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player. |
| 49 | LBDay 2· Vanderbilt· model #64 | LB | Day 2 | Vanderbilt | low need | #64 | 0.50 | A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player. |
| 50 | DLDay 2· TCU· model #68 | DL | Day 2 | TCU | low need | #68 | 0.50 | A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player. |