Draftanomics
  • 2027 board
  • All prospects
  • By college
  • By position
  • Consensus board
  • 2028 way-too-early
  • How the draft works
  • When is the draft
  • Draft news
  • Simulator
  • The house mock
  • Draft order
  • Trade calculator
  • The Scouting Slate
  • Sleepers & reaches
  • Movers & fallers
  • Player comps
  • Team needs
  • Dynasty rookie board
  • Glossary
  • Track record
  • Past drafts, re-graded
  • Analyst leaderboard
My rankingsAccount
Get the weekly →
Draftanomics

Honest NFL Draft analytics. The model's receipts against actual NFL teams live on the track record.

Boards
  • 2027 board
  • Consensus board
  • Sleepers
Tools
  • Mock draft simulator
  • Plays Like
  • Dynasty rookie board
Track Record
  • Year-by-year results
  • Accountability Index
  • Our board, on the record
  • Past drafts, re-graded
  • Methodology
  • Developers · free API
  • About
Account
  • My board
  • Weekly email
Data + sources
RAS by Kent Lee Platte·Consensus Big Board (Arif Hasan)·nflverse·PFR·CFBD·All sources & credits·Methodology
Career-value model, live
Privacy·Terms·Press ⌘K to search·Draftanomics2026
  1. Draftanomics/
  2. 2028 board/
  3. TEN

TEN

2028 team hub
Refreshed just now
GM:Mike Borgonzinew regime
Scheme:Vertical4-3Match ZonePower Setter
Picks
7
1st @ #7
Draft capital
27.8
more capital than 81% of teams
Top model fit
Brent Gordon
S · best blend of grade and roster need
🎯Mock as this team
TEN
TeamTeam hub·
ClassMock draft simulator
Target boardDraft capitalHaul gradeSchemeCap outlook

Who TEN should take — each prospect's model grade, weighted up where the roster is thin, so highly graded players at positions TEN needs rise to the top.

50/50 prospects
Rank↑PlayerPosTierCollegePos needModel rankFitWhy he fits
1
Brent Gordon
SBlue Chip· Louisiana· model #1
SBlue ChipLouisianalow need#10.58A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board says top-15 talent.
2
Miles Jones
SBlue Chip· Southern Miss· model #2
SBlue ChipSouthern Misslow need#20.53A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board says top-15 talent.
3
Colton Phares
SBlue Chip· App State· model #4
SBlue ChipApp Statelow need#40.53A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board says top-15 talent.
4
Corey Myrick
CB1st Round· Clemson· model #7
CB1st RoundClemsonlow need#70.52A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board says top-15 talent.
5
Jacob Fields
CB1st Round· TCU· model #8
CB1st RoundTCUlow need#80.52A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board says top-15 talent.
6
Kal-El Pascal
S1st Round· Bowling Green· model #9
S1st RoundBowling Greenlow need#90.52A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board says top-15 talent.
7
KJ Bolden
S1st Round· Georgia· model #10
S1st RoundGeorgialow need#100.52A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board says top-15 talent.
8
Chris Bracy
S1st Round· Michigan· model #17
S1st RoundMichiganlow need#170.52A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a first-rounder.
9
Zashon Rich
CB1st Round· Kansas State· model #25
CB1st RoundKansas Statelow need#250.52A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a first-rounder.
10
Mister Clarkerank#21$4.8M
S1st Round· Florida International· model #21
S1st RoundFlorida Internationallow need#210.52A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a first-rounder.
11
Kelley Jones
S1st Round· Mississippi State· model #20
S1st RoundMississippi Statelow need#200.52A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a first-rounder.
12
Elijah Palmer
CB1st Round· Hawai'i· model #18
CB1st RoundHawai'ilow need#180.52A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a first-rounder.
13
Ja'Marley Riddle
S1st Round· Georgia· model #28
S1st RoundGeorgialow need#280.52A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a first-rounder.
14
Julian Sayinrank#32
QB1st Round· Ohio State· model #32
QB1st RoundOhio Statelow need#320.51A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a first-rounder.
15
Tyler Brown
SDay 2· Iowa· model #35
SDay 2Iowalow need#350.51A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player.
16
Tawfiq Byard
SDay 2· Texas A&M· model #34
SDay 2Texas A&Mlow need#340.51A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player.
17
Darian Mensahrank#37
QBDay 2· Miami· model #37
QBDay 2Miamilow need#370.51A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player.
18
Zyeir Gamble
SDay 2· East Carolina· model #58
SDay 2East Carolinalow need#580.50A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player.
19
Xavier Lucas
SDay 2· Miami· model #70
SDay 2Miamilow need#700.50A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player.
20
Montana Warren
SDay 2· Arizona State· model #69
SDay 2Arizona Statelow need#690.50A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player.
21
Dontay Joyner
SDay 2· Maryland· model #65
SDay 2Marylandlow need#650.50A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player.
22
Ashton Hampton
SDay 2· Clemson· model #62
SDay 2Clemsonlow need#620.50A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player.
23
Bryce Thornton
SDay 2· Florida· model #75
SDay 2Floridalow need#750.49A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player.
24
Aaron Williamsrank#94$1.6M
CBDay 2· UCLA· model #94
CBDay 2UCLAlow need#940.48A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player.
25
Antonio Smith
SDay 2· Missouri State· model #95
SDay 2Missouri Statelow need#950.48A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player.
26
David Moorerank#97$1.5M
CBDay 2· Arkansas State· model #97
CBDay 2Arkansas Statelow need#970.48A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player.
27
Jeremiah Jonesrank#104$1.5M
SDay 2· Wittenberg· model #104
SDay 2Wittenberglow need#1040.48A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player.
28
Michael Richardrank#106$1.5M
SDay 3· Michigan State· model #106
SDay 3Michigan Statelow need#1060.48A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board has him at No. 106.
29
RJ McIntoshrank#108$1.4M
SDay 3· Tulsa· model #108
SDay 3Tulsalow need#1080.48A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board has him at No. 108.
30
Jamel Johnsonrank#101$1.5M
SDay 2· TCU· model #101
SDay 2TCUlow need#1010.48A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player.
31
Dylan Raiolarank#109
QBDay 3· Oregon· model #109
QBDay 3Oregonlow need#1090.48A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board has him at No. 109.
32
Nate Bennett
QBDay 3· Baylor· model #111
QBDay 3Baylorlow need#1110.48A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board has him at No. 111.
33
Zy'Aire Fletcher
ATHDay 3· Kent State· model #127
ATHDay 3Kent Statelow need#1270.47A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board has him at No. 127.
34
Tyler Cherry
QBDay 3· Indiana· model #126
QBDay 3Indianalow need#1260.47A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board has him at No. 126.
35
Khai Preanrank#124$1.4M
ATHDay 3· Tulane· model #124
ATHDay 3Tulanelow need#1240.47A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board has him at No. 124.
36
Elija Waltonrank#123$1.4M
ATHDay 3· Georgia Southern· model #123
ATHDay 3Georgia Southernlow need#1230.47A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board has him at No. 123.
37
Devon Dampierrank#128
QBDay 3· Utah· model #128
QBDay 3Utahlow need#1280.47A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board has him at No. 128.
38
Demond Williams Jr.
QBDay 3· Washington· model #130
QBDay 3Washingtonlow need#1300.47A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board has him at No. 130.
39
EJ Colson
QBDay 3· UCF· model #133
QBDay 3UCFlow need#1330.46A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board has him at No. 133.
40
Sean Martinrank#135$1.3M
SDay 3· Navy· model #135
SDay 3Navylow need#1350.46A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board has him at No. 135.
41
Brad Jackson
QBDay 3· Texas State· model #137
QBDay 3Texas Statelow need#1370.46A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board has him at No. 137.
42
Arch Manningrank#142
QBDay 3· Texas· model #142
QBDay 3Texaslow need#1420.45A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board has him at No. 142.
43
Jeremiah Smithrank#26$4.5M
WR1st Round· Ohio State· model #26
WR1st RoundOhio Statelow need#260.45A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a first-rounder.
44
CJ Bailey
QBDay 3· NC State· model #145
QBDay 3NC Statelow need#1450.45A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board has him at No. 145.
45
Evan Dickens
RBDay 2· Boston College· model #39
RBDay 2Boston Collegelow need#390.45A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player.
46
LJ Martinrank#41$3.3M
RBDay 2· BYU· model #41
RBDay 2BYUlow need#410.44A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player.
47
Sedrick Alexanderrank#42$3.3M
RBDay 2· Vanderbilt· model #42
RBDay 2Vanderbiltlow need#420.44A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player.
48
Justice Haynesrank#47$2.9M
RBDay 2· Georgia Tech· model #47
RBDay 2Georgia Techlow need#470.44A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player.
49
Mark Fletcherrank#50$2.6M
RBDay 2· Miami· model #50
RBDay 2Miamilow need#500.44A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player.
50
Will Henderson
RBDay 2· UTSA· model #55
RBDay 2UTSAlow need#550.43A best-player-available play, not a need pick; the board sees a top-100 player.